Author Topic: Arnold is back...on the cover ! (Read 4107 times)

Pet shop boys · « **on:** July 31, 2012, 05:15:52 AM »

Arnold is 65, so an special issue from Ironman mag,featuring few "Arnold pictures" that have made the cover before, is on stands.

WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

The_Punisher · « **Reply #1 on:** July 31, 2012, 05:18:36 AM »

Arnold is back on the cover of another muscle magazine for the 101 time.....I guess it helps in selling those Mags....I wonder if Arnie get any small fee at all

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #2 on:** July 31, 2012, 05:19:38 AM »

I knew he would be back !!

TrueGrit · « **Reply #3 on:** July 31, 2012, 05:20:30 AM »

These mags stick Arnold on the cover all the fucking time. Then they act like it's something rare and you must buy it.

TrueGrit · « **Reply #4 on:** July 31, 2012, 05:21:33 AM »

Quote from: The_Punisher on July 31, 2012, 05:18:36 AM

Arnold is back on the cover of another muscle magazine for the 101 time.....I guess it helps in selling those Mags....I wonder if Arnie get any small fee at all

x2.

Tito24 · « **Reply #5 on:** July 31, 2012, 06:01:30 AM »

yes its terrible but people probably rather buy a bbing magazine with something as "accepted" as arnold on the cover than some "steroid unknown criminal" on it.
and you have people buying the arnold magazine who would never buy a normal bbing magazine .

jesus why buy a bbing magazine anyway, its the biggest waste of money, buying supplements is still a little more useful than that.

Pet shop boys · « **Reply #6 on:** July 31, 2012, 06:08:33 AM »

While those pics are 35-40 years old......Arnold still looks better than champs like Branch or Johnny Jackson Specialy in poses like that.....

But what's funny is that you see more rare pictures of Arnold than in those magazines.

WOOOOSSSSHHHHHHHH

the trainer · « **Reply #7 on:** July 31, 2012, 06:21:44 AM »

Quote from: Tito24 on July 31, 2012, 06:01:30 AM

yes its terrible but people probably rather buy a bbing magazine with something as "accepted" as arnold on the cover than some "steroid unknown criminal" on it.
and you have people buying the arnold magazine who would never buy a normal bbing magazine .

jesus why buy a bbing magazine anyway, its the biggest waste of money, buying supplements is still a little more useful than that.

Because its a pain taking the computer into the bathroom to jerk off its a lot easier to take the magazine.

240 is Back · « **Reply #8 on:** July 31, 2012, 06:26:03 AM »

yeah he's yet to be topped.

Radical Plato · « **Reply #9 on:** July 31, 2012, 06:27:26 AM »

Do people really still buy bodybuilding magazines?

Pet shop boys · « **Reply #10 on:** July 31, 2012, 06:58:46 AM »

Quote from: E-Kul on July 31, 2012, 06:27:26 AM

Do people really still buy bodybuilding magazines?

Good question........

They're like $7.00

So I think at that price,they must be selling...specially in this particular case,with Arnold on cover and expandables coming in two weeks.

WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HH

OneMoreRep · « **Reply #11 on:** July 31, 2012, 07:22:42 AM »

Why people still buy bodybuilding magazines is beyond me.

I remember buying a pair of Muscular Development & Flex magazines back in 2000 and found them both to be utter garbage.

Muscular development was composed of 15 pages of muscle cartoons, followed by 10 pages of ghost written articles and then 200 pages of useless advertising, which would then culminating with a 3 page ramble from Valentino. The worst part is that they would always tout on their covers how their present issue was the biggest one up to date; when in reality their useless magazine was 90% advertisements and 10% garbage anyway.

Flex tried to have a little more integrity, but when you have an article supposedly written by Ronnie Coleman where he uses words that could only be attributed to a literature major, it starts to smell like shit.

Both magazines went crazy with their photoshopped covers, not to mention their pricing scheme.

Pure garbage..
"1"

Tito24 · « **Reply #12 on:** July 31, 2012, 08:17:35 AM »

i never saw a guy with muscles buy such a magazines, only for the naive youth

Hulkotron · « **Reply #13 on:** July 31, 2012, 08:49:59 AM »

Quote from: Tito24 on July 31, 2012, 06:01:30 AM

jesus why buy a bbing magazine anyway, its the biggest waste of money, buying supplements is still a little more useful than that.

Some people like to "look" at the pictures of the muscle-men.

The_Punisher · « **Reply #14 on:** July 31, 2012, 08:52:21 AM »

Quote from: OneMoreRep on July 31, 2012, 07:22:42 AM

Why people still buy bodybuilding magazines is beyond me.

I remember buying a pair of Muscular Development & Flex magazines back in 2000 and found them both to be utter garbage.

Muscular development was composed of 15 pages of muscle cartoons, followed by 10 pages of ghost written articles and then 200 pages of useless advertising, which would then culminating with a 3 page ramble from Valentino. The worst part is that they would always tout on their covers how their present issue was the biggest one up to date; when in reality their useless magazine was 90% advertisements and 10% garbage anyway.

Flex tried to have a little more integrity, but when you have an article supposedly written by Ronnie Coleman where he uses words that could only be attributed to a literature major, it starts to smell like shit.

Both magazines went crazy with their photoshopped covers, not to mention their pricing scheme.

Pure garbage..
"1"

MD got rid of the muscular cartoons now.....they're focusing on what real bodybuilding is about

Rudee · « **Reply #15 on:** July 31, 2012, 10:40:30 PM »

'Wasp' waist!

PORKY · « **Reply #16 on:** July 31, 2012, 11:13:09 PM »

Seems to me they are trying to regain some mainstream attention and they know Arnold's physique will always be accepted rather than the current mass monsters out there.

Tito24 · « **Reply #17 on:** July 31, 2012, 11:15:57 PM »

Quote from: the trainer on July 31, 2012, 06:21:44 AM

Because its a pain taking the computer into the bathroom to jerk off its a lot easier to take the magazine.

LOL!

hazbin · « **Reply #18 on:** July 31, 2012, 11:24:29 PM »

Quote from: OneMoreRep on July 31, 2012, 07:22:42 AM

Why people still buy bodybuilding magazines is beyond me.

I remember buying a pair of Muscular Development & Flex magazines back in 2000 and found them both to be utter garbage.

Muscular development was composed of 15 pages of muscle cartoons, followed by 10 pages of ghost written articles and then 200 pages of useless advertising, which would then culminating with a 3 page ramble from Valentino. The worst part is that they would always tout on their covers how their present issue was the biggest one up to date; when in reality their useless magazine was 90% advertisements and 10% garbage anyway.

Flex tried to have a little more integrity, but when you have an article supposedly written by Ronnie Coleman where he uses words that could only be attributed to a literature major, it starts to smell like shit.

Both magazines went crazy with their photoshopped covers, not to mention their pricing scheme.

Pure garbage..
"1"

haha, i remember reading articles 'written' by Sergio Oliva where he talked about the theoretical implications of certain training styles.

Tito24 · « **Reply #19 on:** July 31, 2012, 11:25:51 PM »

haha yes when i red these articles of pros i thought they were all so in the know and smart. ha ha!

booty · « **Reply #20 on:** August 01, 2012, 12:41:51 AM »

I haven't seen an Ironmag here for ages. Used to be a great mag but it went down hill.

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #21 on:** August 01, 2012, 03:00:56 AM »

Quote from: hazbin on July 31, 2012, 11:24:29 PM

haha, i remember reading articles 'written' by Sergio Oliva where he talked about the theoretical implications of certain training styles.

As a kid I really thought they wrote those articles themselves, until I realized most of them were (close to) illiterate...

MusselFreek · « **Reply #22 on:** August 01, 2012, 03:18:59 AM »

I buy MD cuz of women in these mags with their DD's mmm. Til they removed them.. I stopped buying.

Tito24 · « **Reply #23 on:** August 01, 2012, 04:50:48 AM »

if i want to see women i buy a porn magazine. oh wait fuck that i dont even buy magazines for porno