I just don't the time or interest right now but I'll quickly address the first two
Typical evasion.
Bush tax cuts expiring are not a tax increase by Obama - if you have a problem with it then blame Bush and the Republicans but there hands were tied too because the rule on congress forced it to sunset due to the fact that it increase d the deficict - something that has been said on this board about 100 time
So blame Bush and the Republicans even though their hands were tied by a Democrat filibuster?
Obama could take the course of "Bush and the Republicans" and extend the tax cuts for a ten-year period in order to avoid the Byrd rule. So why hasn't he done so? Why is he arguing for
payroll tax cut was temporary and the expiration brings the rate right back to where is was when Obama took office - hence no increase in taxes
So would you also argue that the study which claims that Romney is raising taxes on middle-income earners is bogus, because the entire premise behind the Romney tax plan raising taxes on middle-income earners relies on the assumption that Romney will allow these payroll tax cuts to expire?
So by the same token - does that mean that Obama's tax plan will raise taxes on middle-income earners? After all, if it applies to Romney, shouldn't it apply to Obama?
I personally have a HSA as part of my insuranc. Any $'s into the account gives you a TAX benefit. Just because I can't use the $s' to buy OTC medicine at my discretion doesn't mean I've lost my tax benefit
It means you have to pay taxes on money used to buy OTC medicine. That is a tax hike, plain and simple.
Jesus man, this is all easy stuff to understand. I can't believe you actually need this explained to you
That's how I feel about you every single time I reply to your painful kneepadding or economic ignorance.
I'd explain the others but have no time or interest on this Saturday morning
Typical evasion.