Christians Boycott Target for Homosexual Sin

[Straw Man]

http://www.usanewsfirst.com/2012/07/19/christians-boycott-target-for-homosexual-sin/

Christians Boycott Target for Homosexual Sin

Boycott Target

Many have joined to Boycott Target. Target has refused to listen to the 31 states that have unanimously voted for God’s marriage of one man and one woman, with North Carolina being the most recent state. The American people have never voted for homosexual sin “marriages”.

The reason is Target now sells homosexual cards. LifeSiteNews.com reports: “The cards, produced by Carlton Cards, include phrases like ‘Mr. & Mr.’ and ‘Two very special women, one very special love.’”

“This is unwise. The Holy Bible says Carlton Cards and Target are an abomination to the LORD (Leviticus 18:22). Target has unwisely decided to go the way of Sodom and Gomorrah,” said a church elder.

Some families explain they no loner feel comfortable at Target.

Financial analysts say sooner or later Target’s finances will decrease.

Pastors warn not to share in the sins of others.

This makes no business sense either because Target has disappointed the Christian majority of Americans say business analysts.

Cameron shows that homosexuals die at 42 years old. CDC says that 20% of homosexuals have HIV. Homosexual sin is a dangerous lifestyle.

Wanting to bring God’s blessings and hope back to the USA, Pastor Steven Andrew has called for Seven Months of National Repentance says:

“Our Founding Fathers would be outraged at the depravity of Target. George Washington forbid homosexual sin, cursing and gambling in the military so God would be with the military. He ordered all the military to go to Christian church and still told Americans, ‘We beseech [God] to pardon our national and other transgressions…’ What would George Washington say today? There is hope for the USA in following God.”

Pastors remind us that “The Blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin…” (1 John 1:7) so there is hope.

The 7 Months of National Repentance can be found here.

http://www.usachristianministries.com/2012/06/27/7-months-of-national-repentance-to-save-the-usa/

[240 is Back]

hypocrisy on both sides when it comes to this.  anyone who says 'but but but one side is worse than the other" deserves herpes of the ass, if such a thing exists.

[Straw Man]

hypocrisy on both sides when it comes to this.  anyone who says 'but but but one side is worse than the other" deserves herpes of the ass, if such a thing exists.

and the Chik Fil A thing only became a story because it became known that The Muppet company stopped doing business with them

this was not something any person or group coerced them in to doing with a protest or a boycott

this was personal choice of the CEO for her own personal reasons

who on this board could possibly have a problem with that ?

[Shockwave]

Oh brother... more bent out of shape retards doing their best to try an impose their beliefs on others...

[Fury]

Claims he isn't angry after making venom-laced post....Googles two week old article to try to make himself feel better.






#fail

[dario73]

LOL!!!  The o.p. is butthurt.

Anyone can boycott and have the right to protest. What no one has the right to do is to void building permits based solely on the point of view of the company's president. That is infringing on freedom of speech. Chick-fil-a and Target can express their views and people can either continue shopping there or boycott them but politicians should not be interfering with their decisions as to where they are going to do business.

[GigantorX]

LOL!!!  The o.p. is butthurt.

Anyone can boycott and have the right to protest. What no one has the right to do is to void building permits based solely on the point of view of the company's president. That is infringing on freedom of speech. Chick-fil-a and Target can express their views and people can either continue shopping there or boycott them but politicians should not be interfering with their decisions as to where they are going to do business.

Yes.

The whole "anti-discrimination" set of laws cuts both ways.

If the President of Chic-Fil-A said that he endorsed gay marriage and the Alderman attempted to block the building of the new store based on that, what would the situation at this point?

[Purge_WTF]

LOL!!!  The o.p. is butthurt.

Anyone can boycott and have the right to protest. What no one has the right to do is to void building permits based solely on the point of view of the company's president. That is infringing on freedom of speech. Chick-fil-a and Target can express their views and people can either continue shopping there or boycott them but politicians should not be interfering with their decisions as to where they are going to do business.

  That.

  I heard on TV last night that Mayor Mumbles Menino said that he somehow wouldn't allow Chick-Fil-A in Boston. Seriously? You're gonna ban a restaurant chain from one of the biggest cities in the world?

[Straw Man]

Claims he isn't angry after making venom-laced post....Googles two week old article to try to make himself feel better.#fail

I'll help you understand it one more time

I have no problem with anyone protesting anything but let's not pretend that the gays are suddenly attacking Chik Fil A.    The entire thing started when Lisa Henson (the CEO of the Jim Henson Compan) made the decision to stop doing business with Chik Fil A due to the owners personal views on gay marriage.   This was not the results of protests or boycotts or anything else.   This was her personal decision on what to do with her company

Does anyone on this board have any problem with that..... I assume the answer is no

Back to my first sentence.   I have no problem if people want to protest or boycott a business and fundies certainly have a long history of protesting almost everything under the sun from stores to movies and TV shows and books....all due to their own personal religous beliefs so let's stop all the phony victimhood