|
Mattyh7688
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: August 29, 2012, 09:15:49 PM » |
|
Heath would win because his conditioning is MUCH better..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bevo
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 29, 2012, 10:30:52 PM » |
|
flex wins
But Phil wins the olympia |
|
|
|
|
|
Master Blaster
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 29, 2012, 10:40:15 PM » |
|
Upper back and triceps for Flex, but Phill has that meatiness that the judges adore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
johnny1
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 29, 2012, 11:38:11 PM » |
|
From my FB page. Very similar. Structure, density, shape, everything. Who ya got?
Close call, @ his Peak Flex Had that really Deep Separation in the Middle and LOWER Back, Heaths got the Ham/Glute Separation on Flex close call ether way |
|
|
|
|
|
tommywishbone
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 29, 2012, 11:42:27 PM » |
|
Great shot right there. Probably 224-228 tops, but crazy.
|
Power to the people.
|
|
|
|
johnny1
|
|
« Reply #30 on: August 30, 2012, 12:39:38 AM » |
|
Here's another from the 93 Arnold, can not recall his weight something like 216-219lbs @ the show
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #31 on: August 30, 2012, 01:43:42 AM » |
|
Flex would beat Heath.
1. Pics from Heath are 'doctored' to a much higher degree
2. Heath lacks the balance and flow of a pre-oil Wheeler
3. Heath has a strange midsection that 'disturbs' many poses
4. Heath has narrow clavicles (yes, narrower than Flex, and with a wider waist) that 'destroys' many poses
5. Due to point 3 and 4 and many more, Flex would dominate Heath in most of the mandatories (except back lat spread)
I will now post some pics to illustrate my points...
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #32 on: August 30, 2012, 01:53:04 AM » |
|
FDB
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #33 on: August 30, 2012, 01:57:20 AM » |
|
more FDB
|
|
|
|
|
|
johnny1
|
|
« Reply #34 on: August 30, 2012, 02:00:50 AM » |
|
more FDB
^That FDB from the 1992 USA is Unbelievable  |
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2012, 02:02:23 AM » |
|
FLS
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #36 on: August 30, 2012, 02:06:14 AM » |
|
SC
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #37 on: August 30, 2012, 02:07:09 AM » |
|
More SC
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #38 on: August 30, 2012, 02:10:19 AM » |
|
From the back - Christmas three
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanest Natural
|
|
« Reply #39 on: August 30, 2012, 02:11:39 AM » |
|
Fleax easily .. who disagrees, need to study schmoebuilding for a few more years ... I know people love Heath but to compare him with Flex's best showing ever and arguably one of the best showings ever in shape on stage in history, is a little ludicrous.
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #40 on: August 30, 2012, 02:13:14 AM » |
|
More from the BACK
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #41 on: August 30, 2012, 02:14:30 AM » |
|
More BACK
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #42 on: August 30, 2012, 02:15:33 AM » |
|
More BACK
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #43 on: August 30, 2012, 02:16:32 AM » |
|
More BACK
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #44 on: August 30, 2012, 02:21:12 AM » |
|
Only reason why flex appears smoother in hams is because of pic quality tommy posted 93 vs current hi-def pics. As parker said, flex could not have been in better condition, everyone that follows bbing knows AC 93 flex was unbeatable (on the day vs competitors of the time).
On other hand, phil has a very good back. The man is mostly delts & arms, has a comparatevely weak chest and width, but he has a very good RDB, great back, hams, very dry. Its an underrated facet of his physique, because what people first see is these huge arms.
93 AC Flex Wheeler vs Heath? Flex wins IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #45 on: August 30, 2012, 02:22:16 AM » |
|
Different versions of the MM
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #46 on: August 30, 2012, 02:23:46 AM » |
|
More MM
|
|
|
|
|
|
johnny1
|
|
« Reply #47 on: August 30, 2012, 02:25:49 AM » |
|
................93
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #48 on: August 30, 2012, 02:26:50 AM » |
|
More MM
|
|
|
|
|
EspenG
Getbig II
Posts: 139
yawn
|
|
« Reply #49 on: August 30, 2012, 02:30:34 AM » |
|
Abs
|
|
|
|
|
|
