Author Topic: If Obama is the 4th best POTUS ever, why is he still blaming Bush? (Read 3177 times)

MCWAY · « **Reply #1 on:** September 04, 2012, 09:26:07 AM »

Indeed! Why is president Crybaby so wimpy?

The Dems latest round of excuses is the GOP-run House.

I guess they forgot that Reagan had a Dem Congress and Clinton had a GOP Congress.

dario73 · « **Reply #2 on:** September 04, 2012, 09:50:19 AM »

He should try standup comedy.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #3 on:** September 11, 2012, 05:10:00 AM »

chadstallion · « **Reply #4 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:11:05 AM »

because Bush and his GOP deserve the blame.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #5 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:13:05 AM »

Quote from: chadstallion on September 11, 2012, 07:11:05 AM

because Bush and his GOP deserve the blame.

If Obama's policies were that great why wouldnt he be touting his record vs blaming everyone in site?

Kazan · « **Reply #6 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:22:41 AM »

Quote from: chadstallion on September 11, 2012, 07:11:05 AM

because Bush and his GOP deserve the blame.

Yeah, because no Democrats in congress voted for any of that shit

dario73 · « **Reply #7 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:29:14 AM »

Quote from: Kazan on September 11, 2012, 07:22:41 AM

Yeah, because no Democrats in congress voted for any of that shit

Nah. They didn't vote for any of it. And when they did vote for it, like the Iraqi War, it was because they were misled by Bush. The Democrat party is so innocent, so pure.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #8 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:30:38 AM »

Quote from: dario73 on September 11, 2012, 07:29:14 AM

Nah. They didn't vote for any of it. And when they did vote for it, like the Iraqi War, it was because they were misled by Bush. The Democrat party is so innocent, so pure.

Funny too how the leftist hacks like chad, blackass, whork, lickmensasses, option FAIL, straw, et al never mention that the Demos took over the congress in 2006, both houses and failed to stop the so called bush horrible policies that supposedly led tot he collapse.

dario73 · « **Reply #9 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:44:52 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on September 11, 2012, 07:30:38 AM

Funny too how the leftist hacks like chad, blackass, whork, lickmensasses, option FAIL, straw, et al never mention that the Demos took over the congress in 2006, both houses and failed to stop the so called bush horrible policies that supposedly led tot he collapse.

Democrats are terrible at history. It's only 2012 and they are already revising what they did from 2006 until now. Complete control of both houses and the presidency and they couldn't come up with a budget plan or a decent jobs bill. Shovel ready projects, anyone?

The True Adonis · « **Reply #10 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:55:02 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on September 04, 2012, 09:23:08 AM

He`s not saying that he is the 4th best President. How did you derive that from that video?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #11 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:56:32 AM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on September 11, 2012, 07:55:02 AM

He`s not saying that he is the 4th best President. How did you derive that from that video?

That's is right - he is tying himself actually to first.

The True Adonis · « **Reply #12 on:** September 11, 2012, 07:56:45 AM »

James K. Polk was the most effective President in History. We shouldn`t forget that.

dario73 · « **Reply #13 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:09:45 AM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on September 11, 2012, 07:56:45 AM

James K. Polk was the most effective President in History. We shouldn`t forget that.

Stop trolling,

tu_holmes · « **Reply #14 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:10:25 AM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on September 11, 2012, 07:55:02 AM

He`s not saying that he is the 4th best President. How did you derive that from that video?

Oh... You know how.

If the President says that he's got a lot done... Then he's obviously saying he's the best EVER!!!

The quote is "I would put our legislative and foreign policy accomplishment in our first two years against any president with the possible exceptions of Johnson, FDR, and Lincoln... Just in terms of what we got done."

So by saying he would put his record against theirs, then obviously he must mean he's better than all of them.

Oh brother.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #15 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:12:08 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on September 11, 2012, 08:10:25 AM

Oh... You know how.

If the President says that he's got a lot done... Then he's obviously saying he's the best EVER!!!

The quote is "I would put our legislative and foreign policy accomplishment in our first two years against any president with the possible exceptions of Johnson, FDR, and Lincoln... Just in terms of what we got done."

So by saying he would put his record against theirs, then obviously he must mean he's better than all of them.

Oh brother.

"WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION" means what to you?

tu_holmes · « **Reply #16 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:16:08 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on September 11, 2012, 08:12:08 AM

"WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION" means what to you?

He's comparing his achievements... His statement equates to being "ON PAR" with anyone EXCEPT those guys... So he's AT LEAST AS GOOD.

I know you like to stretch the truth, but DAMN!

The True Adonis · « **Reply #17 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:17:05 AM »

Quote from: dario73 on September 11, 2012, 08:09:45 AM

Stop trolling,

I`m not. Look it up. He accomplished EVERY SINGLE THING he set out to do.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #18 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:17:20 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on September 11, 2012, 08:16:08 AM

He's comparing his achievements... His statement equates to being "ON PAR" with anyone EXCEPT those guys... So he's AT LEAST AS GOOD.

I know you like to stretch the truth, but DAMN!

So again - if those "accomplishments" are so epic and historic as to rate in the top 4 of all time - why is he blaming anyone for anything and not running on his record?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #19 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:18:02 AM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on September 11, 2012, 08:17:05 AM

I`m not. Look it up. He accomplished EVERY SINGLE THING he set out to do.

Correct.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #20 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:39:00 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on September 11, 2012, 08:17:20 AM

So again - if those "accomplishments" are so epic and historic as to rate in the top 4 of all time - why is he blaming anyone for anything and not running on his record?

Valid question... To some extent I agree... Am I incorrect in saying that the only thing that he mentions his predecessor for is the economy?

Does he mention him for anything else?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #21 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:41:38 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on September 11, 2012, 08:39:00 AM

Valid question... To some extent I agree... Am I incorrect in saying that the only thing that he mentions his predecessor for is the economy?

Does he mention him for anything else?

uh, im pretty sure obama has blamed Bush for basically everything from foregin policy to economy to education to the toilet paper in the WH

tu_holmes · « **Reply #22 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:44:47 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on September 11, 2012, 08:41:38 AM

uh, im pretty sure obama has blamed Bush for basically everything from foregin policy to economy to education to the toilet paper in the WH

He DID, but he doesn't say anything about Foreign policy now except that he's done more than Bush.. and I never hear him say anything about education... The economy... yes... he does still talk about Bush there and I think it's ridiculous... but on everything else I hear him talk about his administration, not Bush.

Bush is saved for the economy.

Kazan · « **Reply #23 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:46:57 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on September 11, 2012, 08:44:47 AM

He DID, but he doesn't say anything about Foreign policy now except that he's done more than Bush.. and I never hear him say anything about education... The economy... yes... he does still talk about Bush there and I think it's ridiculous... but on everything else I hear him talk about his administration, not Bush.

Bush is saved for the economy.

He can try to blame Bush all he wants, Obama was a Senator, congress holds the purse strings........

tu_holmes · « **Reply #24 on:** September 11, 2012, 08:49:16 AM »

Quote from: Kazan on September 11, 2012, 08:46:57 AM

He can try to blame Bush all he wants, Obama was a Senator, congress holds the purse strings........

They do, and they don't...

If your belief is that congress holds the purse strings, then you SHOULD vote for Obama... With him as POTUS and the republicans holding the house (and most likely getting the Senate) a nice deadlock would be good to stop spending right?