John Kerry saw a bigger debate bounce than Romney has

[240 is Back]

So, when the media says this is unprecedented, they're absolutely wrong.

On the day of the first presidential debate in 2004, Bush led Kerry by six points nationally. A week after the debate, Bush's lead had disappeared and he was in a near-statistical tie with Kerry ... leading by only .8%. He lost a total of 5.2 points in a near-week's span.
 
Now while this number could change based on tomorrow's results, currently, Obama is .7% behind Romney. He led by 3.1 on the day of the debate. That's a loss of 3.8 points.
 
The difference, of course, is that Bush had a larger lead than Obama ... so, he was able to stay above water. However, the polls shifted and Bush's lead bumped back up to 4 points. The panic was almost the same from the right ... that Kerry got his game-changer. But when the bounce ended, Bush was back on top.
 
The point? We've seen this before.

[garebear]

Interesting.

Did the Republicans claim it was a conspiracy at the time or is that a new thing?

[tonymctones]

Ra Ra Obama!!!

why didnt you quote the source?

its a blog post, and romneys shift was 12 points...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251129753

Im curious why you cut and pasted all but the last sentence of the post you plagerized?

Ill do it for you here cracker jack "Eight years ago, in fact. Unless Obama is down two or three weeks from now, I see no reason to panic."

LOL are you starting to panic cracker jack?

[Soul Crusher]

They are in sheer panic. 

The reason it is not 2004 is that the economy was fine in 2004 and Bush actually had a decent first term.  Kerry was also far more intelligent than Obama.

Obama is done. 

Ra Ra Obama!!!

why didnt you quote the source?

its a blog post, and romneys shift was 12 points...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251129753

Im curious why you cut and pasted all but the last sentence of the post you plagerized?

Ill do it for you here cracker jack "Eight years ago, in fact. Unless Obama is down two or three weeks from now, I see no reason to panic."

LOL are you starting to panic cracker jack?

[garebear]

They are in sheer panic. 

The reason it is not 2004 is that the economy was fine in 2004 and Bush actually had a decent first term.  Kerry was also far more intelligent than Obama.

Obama is done. 

Haha.

The hits just keep on coming.

[Soul Crusher]

Haha.

The hits just keep on coming.

What was the UE rate and food stamp numbers in 2004 FAG bear? 


Obama is going to get landslided in 1984 like fashion. 

you leftists, libs, kooks, and hippies dopers choomers guilt ridden whites are in for a disaster. 

[garebear]

What was the UE rate and food stamp numbers in 2004 FAG bear? 


Obama is going to get landslided in 1984 like fashion. 

you leftists, libs, kooks, and hippies dopers choomers guilt ridden whites are in for a disaster. 

Can you tell me more about Obama's Jr High handlers? It is my greatest fear that I haven't read enough about it.

Thanks.

[Soul Crusher]

Can you tell me more about Obama's Jr High handlers? It is my greatest fear that I haven't read enough about it.

Thanks.

I just posted about that in the vetting thread.


Read this.  Landslide.   http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/09/suffolk_calls_nc_va_fl_for_romney_will_no_longer_poll_states.html