|
|
|
anabolichalo
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2012, 09:43:36 AM » |
|
good every day physique
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jadeveon Clowney
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2012, 09:44:39 AM » |
|
easily maintainable without a lot of drugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stark
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2012, 09:45:48 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Clairmonte
Getbig III
Posts: 899
Team Shawn "Flexatron" Rhoden
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2012, 10:16:50 AM » |
|
good old Haney, perfection.
|
[IMG]http://i49.tiny
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2012, 10:20:52 AM » |
|
good old Haney, perfection.
And remember, this is pre-celltech |
|
|
|
|
|
Sherief Shalaby
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2012, 12:57:21 PM » |
|
actually imo samir's back in 83 beats any version of haney's back even at his very best.. lee's back was wider and thicker but was never as dry and detailed as samir's in 83.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jadeveon Clowney
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2012, 12:59:00 PM » |
|
actually imo samir's back in 83 beats any version of haney's back even at his very best.. lee's back was wider and thicker but was never as dry and detailed as samir's in 83..
oh brother(hood of Arabs). |
|
|
|
|
|
Sherief Shalaby
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2012, 01:02:49 PM » |
|
oh brother(hood of Arabs).
no at all.. overall i prefer lee at his best over samir in 83 but as for the back i think lee's is kinda overrated.. very great indeed but was never conditioned enough.. just my opinion.. |
|
|
|
|
|
_bruce_
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2012, 01:03:31 PM » |
|
Even arms looked great there.
|
[
|
|
|
|
NarcissisticDeity
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2012, 01:07:38 PM » |
|
Great shots , thanks for posting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Diablo Blanco
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2012, 01:08:42 PM » |
|
And remember, this is pre-celltech
Liar, celltech has been around since 1950's with Bill Pearl using it. It was underground, labs in Romania and Pennsylvania. Only pharma quality and it used cadaver creatine. Today's cell tech is nothing like original. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sherief Shalaby
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2012, 01:19:00 PM » |
|
samir's back 83 vs. lee's back 91..
|
|
|
|
|
|
anabolichalo
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2012, 02:06:53 PM » |
|
samir's back 83 vs. lee's back 91..
that arab blows the black out of the water |
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2012, 01:09:54 AM » |
|
Liar, celltech has been around since 1950's with Bill Pearl using it. It was underground, labs in Romania and Pennsylvania. Only pharma quality and it used cadaver creatine. Today's cell tech is nothing like original.
Lee said he only took celltech in 91, because he knew everyone else was on it |
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2012, 01:14:42 AM » |
|
that arab blows the black out of the water
Haney had a fantastic back, but Sherief is right, not as conditioned as Samir For one day in his life, Samir peaked, and was the most complete bber around Great physique, not big, but everything flowed, proportionally perfect. Before haters jump in, I am a Haney fan, Samirs legs were good enough for the time, he was not a midget, and his elbows weren't too pointy. |
|
|
|
|
|
GoneAway
|
|
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2012, 04:40:43 AM » |
|
samir's back 83 vs. lee's back 91..
Tough one... Haney on lats, Samir on traps and arms. Rest is about equal... |
|
|
|
|
|
WOOO
|
|
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2012, 04:58:57 AM » |
|
good old Haney, perfection.
all drugs and gay for pay |
,
|
|
|
|
GoneAway
|
|
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2012, 05:25:07 AM » |
|
For comparisons sake. Haney '85 vs. Arnold '80...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2012, 05:48:53 AM » |
|
For comparisons sake. Haney '85 vs. Arnold '80...
Difficult to compare Haney is holding his arms out with flared lats Arnold is squeezing his scapulae and showing his xmas tree |
|
|
|
|
|
GoneAway
|
|
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2012, 06:12:29 AM » |
|
Difficult to compare
Haney is holding his arms out with flared lats
Arnold is squeezing his scapulae and showing his xmas tree
More accurate... '75 vs '85...  |
|
|
|
|
|
