Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: 7668
Doesnt lie about lifting.
|
 |
« on: November 04, 2012, 07:20:18 AM » |
|
Posted on November 4, 2012, 8:07:40 AM EST by KeyLargo
500 Admirals, Generals to Endorse Romney
Nearly 500 former military admirals and generals are poised to endorse Mitt Romney, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.
The group will post a full page ad in the Washington Times on Monday. The advertisement will have the headline, “We, the undersigned, proudly support Governor Mitt Romney as our nation’s next President and Commander-in-Chief,” followed by the names of the former military commanders.
A spokesman for the group emphasized its independence from the official campaign. The Romney campaign has not sanctioned this ad buy, a spokesman said, and the members of the group are paying the fee themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vince G, CSN MFT
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2012, 07:22:39 AM » |
|
Posted on November 4, 2012, 8:07:40 AM EST by KeyLargo
500 Admirals, Generals to Endorse Romney
Nearly 500 former military admirals and generals are poised to endorse Mitt Romney, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.
The group will post a full page ad in the Washington Times on Monday. The advertisement will have the headline, “We, the undersigned, proudly support Governor Mitt Romney as our nation’s next President and Commander-in-Chief,” followed by the names of the former military commanders.
A spokesman for the group emphasized its independence from the official campaign. The Romney campaign has not sanctioned this ad buy, a spokesman said, and the members of the group are paying the fee themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
That's really not that many but its too little....too late |
A
|
|
|
|
240 is Back
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2012, 07:38:31 AM » |
|
wow, lifetime military men prefer the candidate who wants to increase military spending.
I guess we'll all be shocked when 500 community organizers support obama, right?
Sheeit, choose a year and I bet those same 500 also backed mccain, bush2, Dole, etc.
|
|
|
|
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: 7668
Doesnt lie about lifting.
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2012, 07:40:58 AM » |
|
wow, lifetime military men prefer the candidate who wants to increase military spending.
I guess we'll all be shocked when 500 community organizers support obama, right?
Sheeit, choose a year and I bet those same 500 also backed mccain, bush2, Dole, etc.
Defense of the nation is more important than communist organizing moron. Not that you give a damn though. |
|
|
|
|
|
240 is Back
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2012, 09:42:24 AM » |
|
Defense of the nation is more important than communist organizing moron. Not that you give a damn though.
 wait, wtf? You want to slash military spending in USA by 50% over the next 5 years. I'm okay with obama limiting spending growth - but no way do I agree with you that 50% of it needs to go. And I'm the one who doesn't give a damn about defense of the nation? WTF? That makes no sense. |
|
|
|
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: 7668
Doesnt lie about lifting.
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2012, 10:10:03 AM » |
|
wait, wtf? You want to slash military spending in USA by 50% over the next 5 years. I'm okay with obama limiting spending growth - but no way do I agree with you that 50% of it needs to go. And I'm the one who doesn't give a damn about defense of the nation? WTF? That makes no sense. I said I would go across the board , never happen though. Books need to be balanced. |
|
|
|
|
|
Archer77
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2012, 10:13:09 AM » |
|
wait, wtf? You want to slash military spending in USA by 50% over the next 5 years. I'm okay with obama limiting spending growth - but no way do I agree with you that 50% of it needs to go. And I'm the one who doesn't give a damn about defense of the nation? WTF? That makes no sense. A 50% cut in military spending is reasonable. For one thing, we don't need military bases in Europe or Japan any longer. Also, streamlining the military would be a good thing. Moving away from spending on traditional military implements in favor of a smaller, less bloated and better trained military would result in more efficieny, saving millions, maybe billions in the process. |
A
|
|
|
|
whork
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2012, 11:37:04 AM » |
|
I said I would go across the board , never happen though. Books need to be balanced.
Romney tax breaks + increased military spending means he will bring us into deeper debt than Obamas policies ever will. So i guess you will be voting for Obama? |
|
|
|
|
|
POB
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2012, 11:54:18 AM » |
|
Romney tax breaks + increased military spending means he will bring us into deeper debt than Obamas policies ever will.
So i guess you will be voting for Obama?
That's how I see it, I guess these guys can't add or read between the lines... |
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Bacon
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2012, 11:55:24 AM » |
|
wow, lifetime military men prefer the candidate who wants to increase military spending.
I guess we'll all be shocked when 500 community organizers support obama, right?
Sheeit, choose a year and I bet those same 500 also backed mccain, bush2, Dole, etc.
hahahahahahahH!!! Good point |
✠
|
|
|
|
whork
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2012, 11:55:50 AM » |
|
That's how I see it, I guess these guys can't add or read between the lines...
They point out the economy is shit And then vote for the guy who will make it worse |
|
|
|
|
|
LurkerNoMore
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2012, 04:03:11 PM » |
|
53% of the nation endorsed Obama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2012, 04:21:04 PM » |
|
Mmmmmmm i remember alot of you on here saying that he can't and won't break 50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Bacon
|
|
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2012, 05:11:22 PM » |
|
|
✠
|
|
|
|
Shockwave
|
|
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2012, 05:33:55 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
avxo
Getbig IV
Gender: 
Posts: 3716
I'm about to froth at the mouth!
|
|
« Reply #16 on: November 12, 2012, 07:51:24 PM » |
|
The percentage is meaningless anyways - what matters is the number of electors. |
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Bacon
|
|
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2012, 01:21:10 AM » |
|
meltdown
lol it was  |
✠
|
|
|
|
Beach Bum
|
|
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2012, 12:28:46 PM » |
|
The percentage is meaningless anyways - what matters is the number of electors.
Depends on the point you're trying to make. |
|
|
|
|
|
240 is Back
|
|
« Reply #19 on: November 13, 2012, 11:12:59 PM » |
|
how many people in this scandal were among those endorsing romney? lol
|
|
|
|
|
Archer77
|
|
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2012, 07:19:37 AM » |
|
how many people in this scandal were among those endorsing romney? lol
I had the impression that Patraeus wasn't a Democrat. |
A
|
|
|
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: 7668
Doesnt lie about lifting.
|
|
« Reply #21 on: November 14, 2012, 07:20:20 AM » |
|
I had the impression that Patraeus wasn't a Democrat.
He is along w his wife both are I think. Holly actually works for obama admn too. |
|
|
|
|
|
