Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
April 23, 2014, 03:43:27 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The importance of a God fearing Caucasian male president  (Read 1441 times)
Bodybuilder Lex Reeves
Getbig III
***
Posts: 817


STEROIDSR4LOSERS


View Profile
« on: November 09, 2012, 06:29:45 PM »

No more women, no more "persons of color", no more cult weirdos. Let's just go with what made this country what it is: a simple caucasian christian man. Otherwise you can kiss goodbye your Bible, your firearms, and your Bill Of Rights.
Report to moderator   Logged
che
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 12876



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2012, 06:31:01 PM »

STFU  bitch
Report to moderator   Logged
dr.chimps
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 25223


Sophisticate


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2012, 06:31:23 PM »

Ok, Tonto.    Roll Eyes
Report to moderator   Logged
Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10075

Team Shizzo


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2012, 06:33:17 PM »

I'm ready to get rid of the bible and all the nonsense it brings.
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Hulkotron
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 15161


Step by step with barbells to be outstanding


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2012, 06:59:01 PM »

No more women, no more "persons of color", no more cult weirdos. Let's just go with what made this country what it is: a simple caucasian christian man. Otherwise you can kiss goodbye your Bible, your firearms, and your Bill Of Rights.

We will likely have a Latino president within the next 4-20 years, your thoughts?
Report to moderator   Logged
slate
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1806


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2012, 07:13:37 PM »

what about a white guy that is not from the Caucasus. That might work
Report to moderator   Logged
Bodybuilder Lex Reeves
Getbig III
***
Posts: 817


STEROIDSR4LOSERS


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2012, 07:58:04 PM »

We will likely have a Latino president within the next 4-20 years, your thoughts?

My thoughts are that this sea of murkey brown gravy that inundates the streets will come crawling back to Whitey four years from now when the well of freebies runs dry. The White Man may be out of style today, but He will be back with a vengeance.
Report to moderator   Logged
quadzilla456
Time Out
Getbig IV
*
Posts: 3507

Getbig!


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2012, 08:09:24 PM »

My thoughts are that this sea of murkey brown gravy that inundates the streets will come crawling back to Whitey four years from now when the well of freebies runs dry. The White Man may be out of style today, but He will be back with a vengeance.
You bet. However the jews will try their best to prevent this from happening.
Report to moderator   Logged
Mr. Magoo
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 9802


THE most mistaken identity on getbig


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2012, 08:09:32 PM »

this thread isn't serious, right?
Report to moderator   Logged
pluck
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1745


Getbig!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2012, 09:29:49 PM »

this thread isn't serious, right?

Huge amount of the most influential/remembered/honored/hated world leaders (no athletics) have been white.
You can't dispute this.

Non whites & women can't run things like a white male can.

This isn't a racist rant... Prove me wrong.
Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 17764


"Big" Roger F. Neegars


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2012, 09:33:08 PM »

As the white men who built the modern world abandon their positions of power, we will all suffer as a result. 

 
Report to moderator   Logged

Danjo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1168


If you're coming on...then come on!


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 09, 2012, 09:33:35 PM »

Huge amount of the most influential/remembered/honored/hated world leaders (no athletics) have been white.
You can't dispute this.

Non whites & women can't run things like a white male can.

This isn't a racist rant... Prove me wrong.
Cause you aren't wrong....you are right on the money!!!!!
Report to moderator   Logged

Honest commentary...
Nails
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 23562


Rest In Peace Nasser PIP


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 09, 2012, 09:45:51 PM »

Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 17764


"Big" Roger F. Neegars


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2012, 01:55:17 AM »




I wish he had hit him right in the eye/nose.
Report to moderator   Logged

Rami
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 6786


laughter was had in comfort of homes


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 10, 2012, 01:59:15 AM »



awesome reflexes
Report to moderator   Logged
Wiggs
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 30673


Child of Y'srael


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 10, 2012, 04:30:48 AM »

awesome reflexes

Yes, reptilian.
Report to moderator   Logged

7
Tito24
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20532

I'm a large man but.. one with a plan


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 10, 2012, 04:31:44 AM »

Yes, reptilian.

so true
Report to moderator   Logged
_bruce_
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 15436


Anus Rising


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 10, 2012, 06:31:11 AM »

awesome reflexes

Bush was an amateur boxer.
He started too late so Cus exchanged him for Tyson.
Report to moderator   Logged

[
uberman
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 9318



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: November 11, 2012, 10:53:47 PM »

http://www.icr.org/article/1842/

Evidence for a Young World
by D. Russell Humphreys, Ph.D.
Download Evidence for a Young World PDF

 
Spiral galaxy NGC 1232 in constellation Eridanus. Photo: European Southern Observatory
Here are fourteen natural phenomena which conflict with the evolutionary idea that the universe is billions of years old. The numbers listed below in bold print (usually in the millions of years) are often maximum possible ages set by each process, not the actual ages. The numbers in italics are the ages required by evolutionary theory for each item. The point is that the maximum possible ages are always much less than the required evolutionary ages, while the biblical age (6,000 years) always fits comfortably within the maximum possible ages. Thus, the following items are evidence against the evolutionary time scale and for the biblical time scale. Much more young-world evidence exists, but I have chosen these items for brevity and simplicity. Some of the items on this list can be reconciled with the old-age view only by making a series of improbable and unproven assumptions; others can fit in only with a recent creation.

1. Galaxies wind themselves up too fast.

The stars of our own galaxy, the Milky Way, rotate about the galactic center with different speeds, the inner ones rotating faster than the outer ones. The observed rotation speeds are so fast that if our galaxy were more than a few hundred million years old, it would be a featureless disc of stars instead of its present spiral shape.1 Yet our galaxy is supposed to be at least 10 billion years old. Evolutionists call this "the winding-up dilemma," which they have known about for fifty years. They have devised many theories to try to explain it, each one failing after a brief period of popularity. The same "winding-up" dilemma also applies to other galaxies. For the last few decades the favored attempt to resolve the puzzle has been a complex theory called "density waves."1 The theory has conceptual problems, has to be arbitrarily and very finely tuned, and has been called into serious question by the Hubble Space Telescope's discovery of very detailed spiral structure in the central hub of the "Whirlpool" galaxy, M51.2

2. Too few supernova remnants.

 
Crab Nebula
Photo: Courtesy of NASA
According to astronomical observations, galaxies like our own experience about one supernova (a violently-exploding star) every 25 years. The gas and dust remnants from such explosions (like the Crab Nebula) expand outward rapidly and should remain visible for over a million years. Yet the nearby parts of our galaxy in which we could observe such gas and dust shells contain only about 200 supernova remnants. That number is consistent with only about 7,000 years worth of supernovas.3

3. Comets disintegrate too quickly.

According to evolutionary theory, comets are supposed to be the same age as the solar system, about five billion years. Yet each time a comet orbits close to the sun, it loses so much of its material that it could not survive much longer than about 100,000 years. Many comets have typical ages of less than 10,000 years.4 Evolutionists explain this discrepancy by assuming that (a) comets come from an unobserved spherical "Oort cloud" well beyond the orbit of Pluto, (b) improbable gravitational interactions with infrequently passing stars often knock comets into the solar system, and (c) other improbable interactions with planets slow down the incoming comets often enough to account for the hundreds of comets observed.5 So far, none of these assumptions has been substantiated either by observations or realistic calculations. Lately, there has been much talk of the "Kuiper Belt," a disc of supposed comet sources lying in the plane of the solar system just outside the orbit of Pluto. Some asteroid-sized bodies of ice exist in that location, but they do not solve the evolutionists' problem, since according to evolutionary theory, the Kuiper Belt would quickly become exhausted if there were no Oort cloud to supply it.

4. Not enough mud on the sea floor.

 
Rivers and dust storms dump mud into the sea much faster than plate tectonic sub-duction can remove it.
Each year, water and winds erode about 20 billion tons of dirt and rock from the continents and deposit it in the ocean.6 This material accumulates as loose sediment on the hard basaltic (lava-formed) rock of the ocean floor. The average depth of all the sediment in the whole ocean is less than 400 meters.7 The main way known to remove the sediment from the ocean floor is by plate tectonic subduction. That is, sea floor slides slowly (a few cm/year) beneath the continents, taking some sediment with it. According to secular scientific literature, that process presently removes only 1 billion tons per year.7 As far as anyone knows, the other 19 billion tons per year simply accumulate. At that rate, erosion would deposit the present mass of sediment in less than 12 million years. Yet according to evolutionary theory, erosion and plate subduction have been going on as long as the oceans have existed, an alleged three billion years. If that were so, the rates above imply that the oceans would be massively choked with sediment dozens of kilometers deep. An alternative (creationist) explanation is that erosion from the waters of the Genesis flood running off the continents deposited the present amount of sediment within a short time about 5,000 years ago.

5. Not enough sodium in the sea.

Every year, rivers8 and other sources9 dump over 450 million tons of sodium into the ocean. Only 27% of this sodium manages to get back out of the sea each year.9,10 As far as anyone knows, the remainder simply accumulates in the ocean. If the sea had no sodium to start with, it would have accumulated its present amount in less than 42 million years at today's input and output rates.10 This is much less than the evolutionary age of the ocean, three billion years. The usual reply to this discrepancy is that past sodium inputs must have been less and outputs greater. However, calculations that are as generous as possible to evolutionary scenarios still give a maximum age of only 62 million years.10 Calculations11 for many other seawater elements give much younger ages for the ocean.

6. The earth's magnetic field is decaying too fast.

 
Electrical resistance in the earth's core wears down the electrical current which produces the earth's magnetic field. That causes the field to lose energy rapidly.
The total energy stored in the earth's magnetic field ("dipole" and "non-dipole") is decreasing with a half-life of 1,465 (± 165) years.12 Evolutionary theories explaining this rapid decrease, as well as how the earth could have maintained its magnetic field for billions of years are very complex and inadequate. A much better creationist theory exists. It is straightforward, based on sound physics, and explains many features of the field: its creation, rapid reversals during the Genesis flood, surface intensity decreases and increases until the time of Christ, and a steady decay since then.13 This theory matches paleomagnetic, historic, and present data, most startlingly with evidence for rapid changes.14 The main result is that the field's total energy (not surface intensity) has always decayed at least as fast as now. At that rate the field could not be more than 20,000 years old.15

7. Many strata are too tightly bent.

In many mountainous areas, strata thousands of feet thick are bent and folded into hairpin shapes. The conventional geologic time scale says these formations were deeply buried and solidified for hundreds of millions of years before they were bent. Yet the folding occurred without cracking, with radii so small that the entire formation had to be still wet and unsolidified when the bending occurred. This implies that the folding occurred less than thousands of years after deposition.16

8. Biological material decays too fast.

Natural radioactivity, mutations, and decay degrade DNA and other biological material rapidly. Measurements of the mutation rate of mitochondrial DNA recently forced researchers to revise the age of "mitochondrial Eve" from a theorized 200,000 years down to possibly as low as 6,000 years.17 DNA experts insist that DNA cannot exist in natural environments longer than 10,000 years, yet intact strands of DNA appear to have been recovered from fossils allegedly much older: Neandertal bones, insects in amber, and even from dinosaur fossils.18 Bacteria allegedly 250 million years old apparently have been revived with no DNA damage.19 Soft tissue and blood cells from a dinosaur have astonished experts.20

9. Fossil radioactivity shortens geologic "ages" to a few years.

 
Radio Halo, Photo: Courtesy of Mark Armitage
Radiohalos are rings of color formed around microscopic bits of radioactive minerals in rock crystals. They are fossil evidence of radioactive decay.21 "Squashed" Polonium-210 radiohalos indicate that Jurassic, Triassic, and Eocene formations in the Colorado plateau were deposited within months of one another, not hundreds of millions of years apart as required by the conventional time scale.22 "Orphan" Polonium-218 radiohalos, having no evidence of their mother elements, imply accelerated nuclear decay and very rapid formation of associated minerals.23,24

10. Too much helium in minerals.

Uranium and thorium generate helium atoms as they decay to lead. A study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research showed that such helium produced in zircon crystals in deep, hot Precambrian granitic rock has not had time to escape.25 Though the rocks contain 1.5 billion years worth of nuclear decay products, newly-measured rates of helium loss from zircon show that the helium has been leaking for only 6,000 (± 2000) years.26 This is not only evidence for the youth of the earth, but also for episodes of greatly accelerated decay rates of long half-life nuclei within thousands of years ago, compressing radioisotope timescales enormously.

11. Too much carbon 14 in deep geologic strata.

With their short 5,700-year half-life, no carbon 14 atoms should exist in any carbon older than 250,000 years. Yet it has proven impossible to find any natural source of carbon below Pleistocene (Ice Age) strata that does not contain significant amounts of carbon 14, even though such strata are supposed to be millions or billions of years old. Conventional carbon 14 laboratories have been aware of this anomaly since the early 1980s, have striven to eliminate it, and are unable to account for it. Lately the world's best such laboratory which has learned during two decades of low-C14 measurements how not to contaminate specimens externally, under contract to creationists, confirmed such observations for coal samples and even for a dozen diamonds, which cannot be contaminated in situ with recent carbon.27 These constitute very strong evidence that the earth is only thousands, not billions, of years old.

12. Not enough Stone Age skeletons.

Evolutionary anthropologists now say that Homo sapiens existed for at least 185,000 years before agriculture began,28 during which time the world population of humans was roughly constant, between one and ten million. All that time they were burying their dead, often with artifacts. By that scenario, they would have buried at least eight billion bodies.29 If the evolutionary time scale is correct, buried bones should be able to last for much longer than 200,000 years, so many of the supposed eight billion stone age skeletons should still be around (and certainly the buried artifacts). Yet only a few thousand have been found. This implies that the Stone Age was much shorter than evolutionists think, perhaps only a few hundred years in many areas.

13. Agriculture is too recent.

The usual evolutionary picture has men existing as hunters and gatherers for 185,000 years during the Stone Age before discovering agriculture less than 10,000 years ago.29 Yet the archaeological evidence shows that Stone Age men were as intelligent as we are. It is very improbable that none of the eight billion people mentioned in item 12 should discover that plants grow from seeds. It is more likely that men were without agriculture for a very short time after the Flood, if at all.31



 

14. History is too short.

According to evolutionists, Stone Age Homo sapiens existed for 190,000 years before beginning to make written records about 4,000 to 5,000 years ago. Prehistoric man built megalithic monuments, made beautiful cave paintings, and kept records of lunar phases.30 Why would he wait two thousand centuries before using the same skills to record history? The biblical time scale is much more likely.31

References

Scheffler, H. and Elsasser, H., Physics of the Galaxy and Interstellar Matter, Springer-Verlag (1987) Berlin, pp. 352-353, 401-413.
D. Zaritsky, H-W. Rix, and M. Rieke, Inner spiral structure of the galaxy M51, Nature 364:313-315 (July 22, 1993).
Davies, K., Distribution of supernova remnants in the galaxy, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1994), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 175-184, order from www.creationicc.org/proceedings.php.
Steidl, P. F., Planets, comets, and asteroids, Design and Origins in Astronomy, pp. 73-106, G. Mulfinger, ed., Creation Research Society Books (1983), order from creationresearch.org.
Whipple, F. L., Background of modern comet theory, Nature 263:15-19 (2 September 1976). Levison, H. F. et al. See also: The mass disruption of Oort Cloud comets, Science 296:2212-2215 (21 June 2002).
Milliman, John D. and James P. M. Syvitski, Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers, The Journal of Geology, vol. 100, pp. 525-544 (1992).
Hay, W. W., et al., Mass/age distribution and composition of sediments on the ocean floor and the global rate of sediment subduction, Journal of Geophysical Research, 93(B12):14,933-14,940 (10 December 1988).
Meybeck, M., Concentrations des eaux fluviales en elements majeurs et apports en solution aux oceans, Revue de Géologie Dynamique et de Géographie Physique 21(3):215 (1979).
Sayles, F. L. and P. C. Mangelsdorf, Cation-exchange characteristics of Amazon River suspended sediment and its reaction with seawater, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 43:767-779 (1979).
Austin, S. A. and D. R. Humphreys, The sea's missing salt: a dilemma for evolutionists, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1991), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 17-33, order from www.creationicc.org/proceedings.php.
Nevins, S., [Austin, S. A.], Evolution: the oceans say no!, Impact No. 8 (Nov. 1973) Institute for Creation Research.
Humphreys, D. R., The earth's magnetic field is still losing energy, Creation Research Society Quarterly, 39(1):3-13, June 2002. http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/art
icles/39/39_1/GeoMag.htm.
Humphreys, D. R., Reversals of the earth's magnetic field during the Genesis flood, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1986), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 113-126, out of print but contact www.creationicc.org for help in locating copies.
Coe, R. S., M. Prévot, and P. Camps, New evidence for extraordinarily rapid change of the geomagnetic field during a reversal, Nature 374:687-92 (20 April 1995).
Humphreys, D. R., Physical mechanism for reversals of the earth's magnetic field during the flood, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1991), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 129-142, order from www.creationicc.org/proceedings.php.
Austin, S. A. and J. D. Morris, Tight folds and clastic dikes as evidence for rapid deposition and deformation of two very thick stratigraphic sequences, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1986), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 3-15, out of print, contact www.creationicc.org/proceedings.php for help in locating copies.
Gibbons A., Calibrating the mitochondrial clock, Science 279:28-29 (2 January 1998).
Cherfas, J., Ancient DNA: still busy after death, Science 253:1354-1356 (20 September 1991). Cano, R. J., H. N. Poinar, N. J. Pieniazek, A. Acra, and G. O. Poinar, Jr. Amplification and sequencing of DNA from a 120-135-million-year-old weevil, Nature 363:536-8 (10 June 1993). Krings, M., A. Stone, R. W. Schmitz, H. Krainitzki, M. Stoneking, and S. Pääbo, Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans, Cell 90:19-30 (Jul 11, 1997). Lindahl, T, Unlocking nature's ancient secrets, Nature 413:358-359 (27 September 2001).
Vreeland, R. H.,W. D. Rosenzweig, and D. W. Powers, Isolation of a 250 million-year-old halotolerant bacterium from a primary salt crystal, Nature 407:897-900 (19 October 2000).
Schweitzer, M., J. L. Wittmeyer, J. R. Horner, and J. K. Toporski, Soft-Tissue vessels and cellular preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex, Science 207:1952-1955 (25 March 2005).
Gentry, R. V., Radioactive halos, Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23:347-362 (1973).
Gentry, R. V. , W. H. Christie, D. H. Smith, J. F. Emery, S. A. Reynolds, R. Walker, S. S. Christy, and P. A. Gentry, Radiohalos in coalified wood: new evidence relating to time of uranium introduction and coalification, Science 194:315-318 (15 October 1976).
Gentry, R. V., Radiohalos in a radiochronological and cosmological perspective, Science 184:62-66 (5 April 1974).
Snelling, A. A. and M. H. Armitage, Radiohalos—a tale of three granitic plutons, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (2003), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 243-267, order from www.creationicc.org/proceedings.php. Also archived on the ICR website at www.icr.org/article/radiohalos-granitic-
plutons/.
Gentry, R. V., G. L. Glish, and E. H. McBay, Differential helium retention in zircons: implications for nuclear waste containment, Geophysical Research Letters 9(10):1129-1130 (October 1982).
Humphreys, D. R, et al., Helium diffusion age of 6,000 years supports accelerated nuclear decay, Creation Research Society Quarterly 41(1):1-16 (June 2004). See archived article on following page of the CRS website: www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/4
1/41_1/Helium.htm.
Baumgardner, J. R., et al., Measurable 14C in fossilized organic materials: confirming the young earth creation-flood model, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (2003), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 127-142. Archived at www.icr.org/i/pdf/research/RATE_ICC_Baum
gardner.pdf. See poster presented to American Geophysical Union, Dec. 2003, AGUC-14_Poster_Baumgardner.pdf.
McDougall, I., F. H. Brown, and J. G. Fleagle, Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia, Nature 433(7027):733-736 (17 February 2005).
Deevey, E. S., The human population, Scientific American 203:194-204 (September 1960).
Marshack, A., Exploring the mind of Ice Age man, National Geographic 147:64-89 (January 1975).
Dritt, J. O., Man's earliest beginnings: discrepancies in evolutionary timetables, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (1991), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 73-78, order from www.creationicc.org/proceedings.php.
Additional Resources for items 9-11.

DeYoung, D., Thousands ... Not Billions, Master Books (2005) Green Forest, AR.
Vardiman, L, Snelling, A. A., and Chaffin E. F., editors, Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth, Vol. II, Institute for Creation Research and Creation Research Society (2005) El Cajon, CA and Chino Valley, AZ. (Technical).
*At the time of publication, Dr. Humphreys was an Associate Professor of Physics at ICR.

Cite this article: Humphreys, D. R. 2005. Evidence for a Young World. Acts & Facts. 34 (6).

Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 18141


Team Nurse Bangers


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 11, 2012, 11:03:12 PM »


That actually happened? Hilarious.
Report to moderator   Logged
lovemonkey
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7707


Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: November 11, 2012, 11:09:14 PM »



Are you really a young earth creationist? Why do you always speak of evolution to prove some stupid point of yours then? Are you mentally ill?
Report to moderator   Logged

from incomplete data
Nomad
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3372



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: November 12, 2012, 08:40:29 AM »

Lets make this very simple and easy to understand.

Nasa, early 1970s, ground control crew.



<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGNryrsT7OI" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGNryrsT7OI</a>



late 2010, somewhere in Africa.



<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NR97o_FuX-c" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NR97o_FuX-c</a>
Report to moderator   Logged

all drugs - TPPIIP
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 18141


Team Nurse Bangers


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: November 12, 2012, 08:46:14 AM »

Are you really a young earth creationist? Why do you always speak of evolution to prove some stupid point of yours then? Are you mentally ill?
He's saying that religion was part of what kept the fabric of society together, and that the death of religion is to blame for our increasingly hedonistic and egocentric lifestyles, destroying family values, increasing depression, etc.

Basically, that religion gave most people a reason to live a happy life, to have kids, to have a family... That is our primary purpose in life, to reproduce, and were increasingly moving away from that, and it's causing mass depression and feelings of emptiness. (White people)

I think anyway, thats what I've gathered over most of his posts.
Report to moderator   Logged
tbombz
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 19052


Psalms 150


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: November 12, 2012, 08:52:10 AM »

The platform will undoubtedly include tacos for eveyone
Report to moderator   Logged
tbombz
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 19052


Psalms 150


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: November 12, 2012, 08:54:03 AM »

Its a shame that people correlate religion with god
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!