Author Topic: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan  (Read 176678 times)

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31388
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #350 on: June 19, 2016, 07:59:01 PM »
.
one likes girls one likes boys...hmmmm..

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40625
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #351 on: June 19, 2016, 09:59:52 PM »
Just another example of some dude who is surpassed by the woman standing next to him.

herne

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 137247
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #352 on: June 26, 2016, 12:07:38 PM »
.

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7222
  • Getbig!
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #353 on: June 27, 2016, 03:33:59 AM »
.

A dream coming true right there.

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #354 on: June 27, 2016, 04:25:20 AM »
A dream coming true right there.

Translation: a sucker funds her drug stack, just by toughing her bicep department..

Svengoolie

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1661
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #355 on: June 27, 2016, 04:42:31 AM »
Would it still be schmoeing if sex acts were involved?

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #356 on: June 27, 2016, 06:25:03 AM »
Would it still be schmoeing if sex acts were involved?

Touching or entering the penoris sounds pretty schmoetastic to me..

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21317
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #357 on: June 27, 2016, 06:33:42 AM »
No man would ever desire a shenis sporting she-beast. Schmoes aren't men.

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #358 on: June 27, 2016, 06:35:34 AM »
No man would ever desire a shenis sporting she-beast. Schmoes aren't men.

What would Freud think when he observed this phenomenon

Svengoolie

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1661
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #359 on: June 27, 2016, 07:08:13 AM »
Touching or entering the penoris sounds pretty schmoetastic to me..

But Massino doesn't count, right????  :-\


DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #360 on: June 27, 2016, 07:19:45 AM »
But Massino doesn't count, right????  :-\



Don't confuse me with BMC or Hippo  :-X ;D

Svengoolie

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1661
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #361 on: June 27, 2016, 09:02:47 AM »
Well I guess call me Schmoegoolie then

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21317
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #362 on: June 27, 2016, 11:25:23 AM »
But Massino doesn't count, right????  :-\



The shenis queen?  Fooooooglyl.

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #363 on: June 27, 2016, 11:36:50 AM »
No man would ever desire a shenis sporting she-beast. Schmoes aren't men.

In the 90's a very large female BBer I knew (initials T.L.) would tell me how much schmoes would pay her... just to touch her and have domination holds put on them.  I could not believe the amount of $ they paid her.  Almost all female bodybuilders have taken money from schmoes at some point in their careers.

herne

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 137247
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #364 on: December 10, 2016, 01:16:15 PM »
.

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #365 on: December 10, 2016, 01:24:55 PM »
Shit, her arms are as big or bigger than mine...

J. Richards

  • Competitors
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 429
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #366 on: December 11, 2016, 11:40:10 AM »
nobody's gonna "fix" that...    ;D

Lorenzo Frittata

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 195
  • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv39l6of4eaRZNrMo
Re: Megan : Eye Candy
« Reply #367 on: March 21, 2017, 12:59:57 PM »
Great arms on Megan!













From her Facebook, she must have upped the dosage!


no need, i found it.
Y

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49754
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Megan : Eye Candy
« Reply #368 on: March 21, 2017, 01:03:28 PM »
What's her last name?

Which one?


Jennifer Scarpetta (Now Abshire since they got married) and Megan Abshire
Q

Lorenzo Frittata

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 195
  • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv39l6of4eaRZNrMo
Re: Megan : Eye Candy
« Reply #369 on: March 21, 2017, 01:10:14 PM »
Which one?


Jennifer Scarpetta (Now Abshire since they got married) and Megan Abshire


Did she quit lifting?
Is there something new on her?
She doesn't seem to have instagram.
Y

Lorenzo Frittata

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 195
  • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv39l6of4eaRZNrMo
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #370 on: March 21, 2017, 01:13:00 PM »
Y

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49754
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Megan : Eye Candy
« Reply #371 on: March 21, 2017, 01:14:36 PM »
Did she quit lifting?
Is there something new on her?
She doesn't seem to have instagram.

Last thing i heard is that they went to Lesbos on a Honeymoon.
Q

ESFitness

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10173
  • i win.
Re: Sunday Eye Candy
« Reply #372 on: March 21, 2017, 01:33:03 PM »
Horrible wood paneling, would not shit on her chest.

Carpet looks suspect, & the wall outlet looks to be about 83° when it should be 90°. I'd tear down then building and start over.

Lorenzo Frittata

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 195
  • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv39l6of4eaRZNrMo
Re: Megan : Eye Candy
« Reply #373 on: March 22, 2017, 04:49:29 AM »
Last thing i heard is that they went to Lesbos on a Honeymoon.

LOL
Y

herne

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 137247
Re: Eye Candy - Muscular Megan
« Reply #374 on: July 28, 2017, 03:31:53 PM »