|
Straw Man
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: December 10, 2012, 11:55:32 AM » |
|
If that 300K wage earner runs a small business, he will either hike up the price of his services, cut his employees' hours or lay them off.
For those who make that but don't run a small business, they can (and some often do) look for loopholes.
Besides, who are you to determine for someone else what is "marginally higher" and what isn't?
a 300k WAGE EARNER does not run a small business that's why I said WAGE EARNER if someone runs a business and their taxes go up they can TRY to pass it along to their customer but their customers can choose to purchase somewhere else like I said before, you seem determined to fret about this so carry on I'm not worried about it at all
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: December 10, 2012, 11:56:49 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCWAY
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: December 10, 2012, 11:57:24 AM » |
|
a 300k WAGE EARNER does not run a small business
that's why I said WAGE EARNER
if someone runs a business and their taxes go up they can TRY to pass it along to their customer but their customers can choose to purchase somewhere else
like I said before, you seem determined to fret about this so carry on
I'm not worried about it at all
The passengers on the Titanic weren't worried about the ship sinking, either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCWAY
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: December 10, 2012, 11:59:23 AM » |
|
Again, it appears the two of you are sharing one brain again. Where did I say I'm going to be rich again, unless you're silly enough to think that only rich people want to keep more of what they've rightfully earned?
|
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
    
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: December 10, 2012, 11:59:42 AM » |
|
What is Ball Washer in Chief going to do w the $$$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: December 10, 2012, 11:59:54 AM » |
|
The passengers on the Titanic weren't worried about the ship sinking, either.
really, you think a 3% tax increase over 250k is like being on the Titanic first 250k remain the same so the last 50k is taxed an additional 3% which is a whopping $1500 HOLY SHIT WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE !!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: December 10, 2012, 12:01:10 PM » |
|
What is Ball Washer in Chief going to do w the $$$$
you always seem to be the one to bring that up just can't stop thinking about it can you?
|
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
    
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: December 10, 2012, 12:02:50 PM » |
|
you always seem to be the one to bring that up
just can't stop thinking about it can you?
Stop Baiting me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCWAY
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: December 10, 2012, 12:04:42 PM » |
|
really, you think a 3% tax increase over 250k is like being on the Titanic first 250k remain the same so the last 50k is taxed an additional 3% which is a whopping $1500 SO WHAT!! It's their money!! Once again, we see this daft obsession with your thinking you (or your fellow Obama supporters) are entitled to someone else money. HOLY SHIT WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE !!!!!!
Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases on the planet. But, it doesn't kill people instantly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: December 10, 2012, 12:05:17 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
    
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: December 10, 2012, 12:06:10 PM » |
|
$1,500 less to local resturant, local movie theater, local gas station, local massage therapist, etc etc etc - all into the hands of O-Maddoff
first 250k remain the same so the last 50k is taxed an additional 3% which is a whopping $1500
SO WHAT!! It's their money!! Once again, we see this daft obsession with your thinking you (or your fellow Obama supporters) are entitled to someone else money.
Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases on the planet. But, it doesn't kill people instantly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCWAY
|
 |
« Reply #61 on: December 10, 2012, 12:06:55 PM » |
|
that's what rush told me
I thought you didn't listen to Rush. BTW, let Straw use the half of the brain you keep using. At least, he's better at putting coherent thoughts together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
 |
« Reply #62 on: December 10, 2012, 12:10:00 PM » |
|
first 250k remain the same so the last 50k is taxed an additional 3% which is a whopping $1500
SO WHAT!! It's their money!! Once again, we see this daft obsession with your thinking you (or your fellow Obama supporters) are entitled to someone else money.
Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases on the planet. But, it doesn't kill people instantly.
Exactly..... so what Hardly the Titanic but if you want to piss you pants about it then feel free If the $ amount is not your issue and it's really something you perceive an an injustice of some sort then stick to that argument and stop pretending the sky is falling because someone earning 300k is paying an additional $1500 in federal income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #63 on: December 10, 2012, 12:16:07 PM » |
|
what kind of idiot gets his news from hannity and rush  does anyone know
|
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
    
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
 |
« Reply #64 on: December 10, 2012, 12:17:09 PM » |
|
what kind of idiot gets his news from hannity and rush  does anyone know The same type that gets it from MadCVNT, Fat Ed, Chrissy, etc. Its entertainment not news. Come to Get Big Pol Board for real news. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #65 on: December 10, 2012, 12:18:07 PM » |
|
The same type that gets it from MadCVNT, Fat Ed, Chrissy, etc. Its entertainment not news. Come to Get Big Pol Board for real news.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCWAY
|
 |
« Reply #66 on: December 10, 2012, 12:24:39 PM » |
|
Exactly..... so what
Hardly the Titanic but if you want to piss you pants about it then feel free
If the $ amount is not your issue and it's really something you perceive an an injustice of some sort then stick to that argument and stop pretending the sky is falling because someone earning 300k is paying an additional $1500 in federal income tax
I am sticking to the argument, which is neither YOU nor your Obama-worshipping buddies have the right to other people's money, claiming it's being done to pay down the debt and help the middle class, when everybody (including YOU) knows that it will do neither. I used the Titanic, because people like you never see the danger, until the iceberg shows up and it's too late. And, much like the Titanic, no matter how much you and the other lefties try to re-tell the account, the end is the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
 |
« Reply #67 on: December 10, 2012, 12:26:57 PM » |
|
I am sticking to the argument, which is neither YOU nor your Obama-worshipping buddies have the right to other people's money, claiming it's being done to pay down the debt and help the middle class, when everybody (including YOU) knows that it will do neither.
I used the Titanic, because people like you never see the danger, until the iceberg shows up and it's too late.
And, much like the Titanic, no matter how much you and the other lefties try to re-tell the account, the end is the same.
I've got news for you The federal government absolutely has the right to tax you and me BTW - don't speak for me. I see no proof at all that increasing revenues would not help reduce the deficit. It's an absurd belief with zero proof so if that's your belief then so be it but don't attribute it to me If you truly don't understand that they we have nothing more to talk about and you can go back to worrying that the 7-11 down the street is going to raise the price of SlimJims by a nickel after the tax rates go up
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #68 on: December 10, 2012, 12:27:52 PM » |
|
so romney must have been your titanic
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCWAY
|
 |
« Reply #69 on: December 10, 2012, 01:07:40 PM » |
|
I've got news for you
The federal government absolutely has the right to tax you and me That isn't news. And I've never said they didn't. They do NOT have to the right to excessive taxation. BTW - don't speak for me. I see no proof at all that increasing revenues would not help reduce the deficit. It's an absurd belief with zero proof so if that's your belief then so be it but don't attribute it to me
If you truly don't understand that they we have nothing more to talk about and you can go back to worrying that the 7-11 down the street is going to raise the price of SlimJims by a nickel after the tax rates go up
You apparently can't count. Raising taxes on the rich won't do JACK to decrease the deficit for one simple reason that you can't quite grasp: THE SPENDING greatly exceeds the revenue. These tax hike will run the government for a whopping week and a half, if that.
|
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
    
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
 |
« Reply #70 on: December 10, 2012, 01:10:24 PM » |
|
so romney must have been your titanic
Obama is the Minow
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
 |
« Reply #71 on: December 10, 2012, 01:15:42 PM » |
|
That isn't news. And I've never said they didn't. They do NOT have to the right to excessive taxation.
I've got more news for you (and it seems obvious you don't know this). The government has the right to any level of taxation that they want and there is nothing excessive about going back to tax rates of the 1990's. If you want to piss and moan then take a look at the tax rates in that golden age of the 1950's that all Repubs seem to yearn for You apparently can't count. Raising taxes on the rich won't do JACK to decrease the deficit for one simple reason that you can't quite grasp: THE SPENDING greatly exceeds the revenue. These tax hike will run the government for a whopping week and a half, if that. no deal has been made yet so the only NET spending increase are the ones you are imagining I've said many many times that we need both tax increases AND spending cuts [/quote]
|
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
    
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
 |
« Reply #72 on: December 10, 2012, 01:18:53 PM » |
|
Can we go back to the spending of the 1990's p[er GDP? I've got more news for you (and it seems obvious you don't know this). The government has the right to any level of taxation that they want and there is nothing excessive about going back to tax rates of the 1990's. If you want to piss and moan then take a look at the tax rates in that golden age of the 1950's that all Repubs seem to yearn for
no deal has been made yet so the only NET spending increase are the ones you are imagining
I've said many many times that we need both tax increases AND spending cuts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
 |
« Reply #73 on: December 10, 2012, 01:26:22 PM » |
|
Can we go back to the spending of the 1990's p[er GDP?
sure, as long as we can go back to the population we had in the 1990s and stop all our wars right now of course only a retard would think that was possible (note I'm not calling you a retard so stop the lip quiver and the tears)
|
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
    
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
 |
« Reply #74 on: December 10, 2012, 01:28:33 PM » |
|
sure, as long as we can go back to the population we had in the 1990s and stop all our wars right now
of course only a retard would think that was possible (note I'm not calling you a retard so stop the lip quiver and the tears)
I thought obama was ending the wars?
|
|
|
|
|
|