333386
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
 |
« on: December 24, 2012, 09:28:32 AM » |
|
BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE: NY Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names In Print & Online!
AMI Global Security ^ | 24 DEC 2012 | Tony Mele
Posted on December 24, 2012, 9:52:36 AM EST by Old Sarge
A New York Newspaper Printed the names and addresses of every Licensed Pistol Permit holder in two Counties and another County is being posted shortly! This is a massive privacy breach and the latest in a series of over the top emotional reactions to the latest shooting tragedy in Sandy Hook CT meant to intimidate the lawful and prey on peoples fears to exploit the gun grabbing agenda.
In an article title “The gun owner next door: What you don’t know about the weapons in your neighborhood” the paper linked to an interactive map titled: “Map: Where are the gun permits in your neighborhood?” where you can search neighborhoods to see who received a legal permit to own a hand gun license listed by name and address.
(Excerpt) Read more at amiglobalsecurity.com ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shockwave
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2012, 09:34:03 AM » |
|
BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE: NY Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names In Print & Online!
AMI Global Security ^ | 24 DEC 2012 | Tony Mele
Posted on December 24, 2012, 9:52:36 AM EST by Old Sarge
A New York Newspaper Printed the names and addresses of every Licensed Pistol Permit holder in two Counties and another County is being posted shortly! This is a massive privacy breach and the latest in a series of over the top emotional reactions to the latest shooting tragedy in Sandy Hook CT meant to intimidate the lawful and prey on peoples fears to exploit the gun grabbing agenda.
In an article title “The gun owner next door: What you don’t know about the weapons in your neighborhood” the paper linked to an interactive map titled: “Map: Where are the gun permits in your neighborhood?” where you can search neighborhoods to see who received a legal permit to own a hand gun license listed by name and address.
(Excerpt) Read more at amiglobalsecurity.com ...
Speechless.... |
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2012, 09:37:35 AM » |
|
Now the criminals will know where to steal weapons. Typical liberal communist attitude on display here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2012, 09:52:13 AM » |
|
Unfucking believable...
more intolerance from those that cry about tolerance folks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2012, 09:54:32 AM » |
|
Now the criminals will know where to steal weapons. Typical liberal communist attitude on display here.
Arent gun permits public record? if you don't know you should ask a lawyer. Btw........jesus christ you are stupid. What thief is going to knowingly break into a home of someone who owns a gun. If anything they would use the list to know which houses to avoid |
|
|
|
|
|
Necrosis
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2012, 09:55:36 AM » |
|
could you post a link? I went to the site and didn't see anything.
nutcases on either side are funny. you have hipsters vs good ol boys
I would vote neil de grasse tyson as POTUS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Necrosis
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2012, 09:56:38 AM » |
|
Arent gun permits public record?
if you don't know you should ask a lawyer.
Btw........jesus christ you are stupid.
What thief is going to knowingly break into a home of someone who owns a gun.
If anything they would use the list to know which houses to avoid
seems counterintuitive to select the home of someone who can inflict lethal death. Criminals are stupid though. |
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
|
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2012, 09:58:19 AM » |
|
Arent gun permits public record?
if you don't know you should ask a lawyer.
Btw........jesus christ you are stupid.
What thief is going to knowingly break into a home of someone who owns a gun.
If anything they would use the list to know which houses to avoid
A lot of things are public record - does not mean the paper shoul be tossing gas on the fire. |
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
|
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2012, 09:59:15 AM » |
|
seems counterintuitive to select the home of someone who can inflict lethal death. Criminals are stupid though.
Apparently not the only people that are stupid |
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
|
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2012, 10:00:27 AM » |
|
Apparently not the only people that are stupid
Correct. The liberal scumbags at the paper doing this are very stupid. |
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
|
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2012, 10:00:50 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
|
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2012, 10:01:23 AM » |
|
A lot of things are public record - does not mean the paper shoul be tossing gas on the fire.
You should go find a lawyer who can explain the definition of "public record" to you |
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
|
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2012, 10:02:21 AM » |
|
Correct. The liberal scumbags at the paper doing this are very stupid.
WHOOSH Right over your head |
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
|
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2012, 10:03:54 AM » |
|
You should go find a lawyer who can explain the definition of "public record" to you
So what is the point of the urinal news doing this? |
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
|
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2012, 10:05:05 AM » |
|
Do you agree with the paper printing the names and addresses of these individuals straw?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shockwave
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 24, 2012, 10:05:31 AM » |
|
You have no problem with a newspaper publishing the names and addresses of everyone that has a CWP? Seems like a violation of privacy to me. And yes, I understand they are public record, but it still seems massively wrong for a newspaper to publish names and addresses without the express consent of the person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Necrosis
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 24, 2012, 10:16:27 AM » |
|
You have no problem with a newspaper publishing the names and addresses of everyone that has a CWP? Seems like a violation of privacy to me. And yes, I understand they are public record, but it still seems massively wrong for a newspaper to publish names and addresses without the express consent of the person.
I few this like offshore tax havens, hey it's not illegal right. no harm no foul. |
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 24, 2012, 10:19:38 AM » |
|
So what is the point of the urinal news doing this?
Obviously to help criminals know where the guns are so they can go steal them |
|
|
|
|
|
240 is Back
|
|
« Reply #18 on: December 24, 2012, 10:29:13 AM » |
|
bad guys should know "These are the houses you will lose your head should you try to rob".
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
|
« Reply #19 on: December 24, 2012, 10:30:10 AM » |
|
If the paper published a list of all the gay marriages in a whole spread there would be outrage from the left.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
|
« Reply #20 on: December 24, 2012, 10:34:11 AM » |
|
If the paper published a list of all the gay marriages in a whole spread there would be outrage from the left.
good lord you're getting dumber by the hour aren't marriages (gay and straight) published every week in the paper ? |
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
|
« Reply #21 on: December 24, 2012, 10:36:38 AM » |
|
good lord you're getting dumber by the hour
aren't marriages (gay and straight) published every week in the paper ?
No , only those putting in notices. |
|
|
|
|
|
Shockwave
|
|
« Reply #22 on: December 24, 2012, 10:47:38 AM » |
|
good lord you're getting dumber by the hour
aren't marriages (gay and straight) published every week in the paper ?
Usually only the people that are putting them into the paper, not to mention they usually don't have addresses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Magoo
|
|
« Reply #23 on: December 24, 2012, 10:49:38 AM » |
|
Do you agree with the paper printing the names and addresses of these individuals straw?
Considering the public record aspect, no character defamation, etc, Do you think it would violate the first amendment if the paper was prohibited from printing the names and addresses of those individuals tony? If not, whynot. |
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
|
« Reply #24 on: December 24, 2012, 12:16:12 PM » |
|
Considering the public record aspect, no character defamation, etc, Do you think it would violate the first amendment if the paper was prohibited from printing the names and addresses of those individuals tony?
If not, whynot.
I didn't mention anything in terms of legality. What's the point of this? It's simply pouring more idiocy into an already idiotic situation. There is no point to this and this does lead to these individuals being harmed either physically, economically or other wise I hope this paper is held responsible |
|
|
|
|
|
