Author Topic: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either  (Read 8427 times)

Slik

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3593
Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« on: December 24, 2012, 09:56:25 AM »
Just a ruse to scam people out of their hard earned money to contribute to the corrupt American cancer society.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31394
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2012, 09:58:33 AM »
Just a ruse to scam people out of their hard earned money to contribute to the corrupt American cancer society.
i hope not,,,

Slik

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3593
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2012, 10:07:15 AM »
K. U guys r gonna think I'm full of shit but late stage testicular cancer that metastasized to his lungs abdomen and brain n he survived that has always been a hard pill for me to swallow.  It's bugged me for a long time. So I got up  posted this never before having heard anyone say this.  So then I just googled it n saw this.  Is this legit?


http://dailycurrant.com/2012/10/18/investigation-reveals-lance-armstrong-cancer/

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31394
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2012, 10:10:19 AM »
K. U guys r gonna think I'm full of shit but late stage testicular cancer that metastasized to his lungs abdomen and brain n he survived that has always been a hard pill for me to swallow.  It's bugged me for a long time. So I got up  posted this never before having heard anyone say this.  So then I just googled it n saw this.  Is this legit?


http://dailycurrant.com/2012/10/18/investigation-reveals-lance-armstrong-cancer/
yeah i mean thats some hill to climb survival is bleak,,,then u survive and are a top athlete for yrs to come,,,

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2012, 10:15:57 AM »
Yep, the celebrated surgeon that wrote about removing Lance's tumors is in on the scam. He was paid with kigs.
O

Slik

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3593
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2012, 10:22:11 AM »
Yep, the celebrated surgeon that wrote about removing Lance's tumors is in on the scam. He was paid with kigs.
yeah. That's why I was asking for input. I don't know what that site is wether it's legit or not. I never read about th surgeon who removed tumors. I do know that w live in a money driven corrupt society tho.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2012, 10:31:03 AM »
"Lance" is a great porn name.

viking1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5173
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2012, 10:41:33 AM »
"Lance" is a great porn name.

"Lance"    Starring Dick Pound from USADA

 :D

Slik

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3593
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2012, 10:47:22 AM »
Armstrong famously got very ill in 1996, contracting cancer. The signs of this showed up very early in the year, but weren’t recognised. This is important: Armstrong, despite having cancer, put in some of his best ever performances. A debilitating disease (at least, Armstrong’s own foundation lists it as such) was having a chronic effect on his body and yet he was performing better than ever before, despite Armstrong’s own admission that he’d noticed abnormalities related to the cancer three years before his diagnosis.

But there’s a subscript to his cancer that hasn’t really been explored: Armstrong by his own claim is the most tested athlete on the planet, and given he enjoyed considerable success in 1996 and beforehand, would certainly have been subject to numerous doping controls. Some cancers - including the type Lance Armstrong had - cause enormously elevated levels of human chorionic gonadotropin hormone (hCG), a naturally occuring hormone in the body, but at low levels in males. Now, there are rules for the amount of hCG permitted in an athlete, because it offers a competitive advantage - not enough to overcome the deficiencies cancers cause, but a good advantage in a healthy human being, because it produces testosterone. An athlete is often considered to have failed a drug test if the urinary T/E (Testosterone:Epitestosterone) ratio is greater than 6. So the UCI would have been testing for it, and Armstrong’s cancer would have resulted in an enormously elevated T/E ratio.

But Armstrong never produced a positive sample. Compare that with Jake Gibb whose life, it could be argued, was saved by USADA’s testing, when it detected those hugely elevated levels in an anti-doping test, and advised him to see a doctor. That ultimately led to the discovery of testicular cancer, and Gibb recovered. Lance Armstrong wasn’t so lucky - so we can assume one of two things. Either the UCI’s anti-doping measures were woefully below standard, and didn’t detect Armstrong’s elevated levels of hCG, allowing his cancer to worsen while competing, or the UCI’s anti-doping discovered Armstrong’s elevated levels and didn’t report them. Either way, it’s a massive condemnation in the UCI’s ability to validate itself as a serious entity in drug testing. At best it’s woefully ineffective, at worst it’s simply corrupt.

http://cavalierfc.tumblr.com/post/30172302298/its-not-about-the-bike


Or thirdly he never had cancer

Slik

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3593
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2012, 10:49:26 AM »
I know some of u r laughing but ten years from now just like in the Seville case someone's gonna look back at this thread n say those crazy mofos from getbig knew all along.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2012, 10:56:09 AM »
that woudl be the biggest case of fraud/betrayl in recent history.

lance would be the biggest villian in the history of sports, bar none.

i do find it odd that the tests didn't find elevated HCG, that doesn't make sense at all.   THey should have seen that a mile away and known something was up.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2012, 10:57:47 AM »
This sounds like BS. I am all for conspiracy theories but show me a serious article where this is mentioned? I just searched Google News and nothing came up. They way they are out to crucify him this would be all over the place if there was any truth to it.

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26018
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2012, 11:36:34 AM »
is lance a narcissistic sociopath?

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2012, 11:45:05 AM »
If someone had a gun to my head and I had to pick whether Lance had cancer or not, I'd say he didn't have cancer.



hrspwr1

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 894
  • flirtin with disaster everyday
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2012, 11:49:21 AM »
maybe he is an android like that weird dude on star trek

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #15 on: December 24, 2012, 11:50:34 AM »
levar burton...?   he was excellent on reading rainbow.

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #16 on: December 24, 2012, 11:51:10 AM »
this is an interesting conspiracy theory... Armstrong is a liar, a cheat and an addict... it's believable.

NelsonMuntz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5922
  • Getbigs Most Positive Member March&October 2017
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #17 on: December 24, 2012, 11:55:20 AM »
how come we never look into the validity of the testers, personally i think they are part of the agenda to make sport look clean and pick and choose who will be busted or who wont, regardless of test results
"

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #18 on: December 24, 2012, 02:14:21 PM »
I bet he never fucked Sheryl Crow. I mean why would she, when he has 10 inch arms and no mass at all.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40625
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #19 on: December 24, 2012, 02:21:38 PM »
K. U guys r gonna think I'm full of shit but late stage testicular cancer that metastasized to his lungs abdomen and brain n he survived that has always been a hard pill for me to swallow.  It's bugged me for a long time. So I got up  posted this never before having heard anyone say this.  So then I just googled it n saw this.  Is this legit?


http://dailycurrant.com/2012/10/18/investigation-reveals-lance-armstrong-cancer/

The Daily Currant, the global satirical newspaper of record. Apparently a publication for the most gullible, which it seems some of you are.

MikMaq

  • Guest
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #20 on: December 24, 2012, 02:23:24 PM »
this is an interesting conspiracy theory... Armstrong is a liar, a cheat and an addict... it's believable.
The dude bought his way through tests that are entirely bullshit. You folk are like sheep.

Dude is still impressive.

My guess is he may of exaggerated some of his symptons to support cancer research but thats about it.

NO ABSENCE OF MUSCLE

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 205
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #21 on: December 24, 2012, 03:14:32 PM »
The dude bought his way through tests that are entirely bullshit. You folk are like sheep.

Dude is still impressive.

My guess is he may of exaggerated some of his symptons to support cancer research but thats about it.

Lance has decided NOT to fight the allegations.  Reason being, he will purjure himself and face jail time -similar to Marion Jones....Lance is a snivelling, dog, lying, cheating scumbag.  His reputation and status is forever destroyed.

Yes, this piece of shit played the cheating steroid game and lost everything....no one likes a cheat and a liar...more to come for this fucking disgrace to the sport.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #22 on: December 24, 2012, 03:17:13 PM »
Lance has decided NOT to fight the allegations.  Reason being, he will purjure himself and face jail time -similar to Marion Jones....Lance is a snivelling, dog, lying, cheating scumbag.  His reputation and status is forever destroyed.

Yes, this piece of shit played the cheating steroid game and lost everything....no one likes a cheat and a liar...more to come for this fucking disgrace to the sport.

Good post NAOM .

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Lance Armstrong prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #23 on: December 24, 2012, 03:18:13 PM »
Lance has decided NOT to fight the allegations.  Reason being, he will purjure himself and face jail time -similar to Marion Jones....Lance is a snivelling, dog, lying, cheating scumbag.  His reputation and status is forever destroyed.

Yes, this piece of shit played the cheating steroid game and lost everything....no one likes a cheat and a liar...more to come for this fucking disgrace to the sport.

So they're all a disgrace to the sport?

It's not his fault the public are a bunch of dumbshits.

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15513
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Lance prolly didn't even have cancer either
« Reply #24 on: December 24, 2012, 03:18:56 PM »
The Daily Currant, the global satirical newspaper of record. Apparently a publication for the most gullible, which it seems some of you are.

Was about to say, it resembles The Onion.