Gun Control-debate, Jesse Ventura VS Piers Morgan

[Kwon_2]

[Roger Bacon]

Thanks for posting this, I saw that.

Morgan is an imbecile, I can't imagine how he got a show.

[WOOO]

Morgan is awesome, but he's getting fat

the american't for pathetic weaponry is childish and unseemly...

[Roger Bacon]

Morgan is awesome, but he's getting fat

the american't for pathetic weaponry is childish and unseemly...

I'm really sorry that my countrymen occupy your mind.  It must be bothersome.   

[WOOO]

I'm really sorry that my countrymen occupy your mind.  It must be bothersome.   

somewhat...

then i open another beer

[mesmorph78]

crazy..

[Roger Bacon]

somewhat...

then i open another beer

Good to hear, keep numbing your mind comrade.  

[Roger Bacon]

First comment: I am British and I would like to publicly apologise for Piers Morgan.

 

[Immortal_Technique]

Jesse no-brain is in fact an idiot, so he's got a point, but Mr Morgan is indeed also an idiot. And his Americanisation does seem to have bloated him somewhat.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Piers show is sinking in the ratings , he needs to get people interested this is a hot topic and get people talking. He doesn't give a shit about guns or the people who were killed , well not as much as ratings.

[Kwon_2]

Ventura should've slapped him.

[haider]

The protection against government argument can only go so far- what do you wanna do, give private militias the same technology our army uses? how about nuclear bombs?

No need for guns in a movie theatre. Guns are inherently unsafe, why would I want that? I'd rather live in a society in which we are not constantly in fear of protecting ourselves, but maybe that's just me. I'm afraid of the psychological effects of carrying a gun with you everywhere you go, and if it predisposes you to use guns in situations that could be handled differently (the problem of 'if I have a hammer, all problems look like nails')

[ChopperRider]

The protection against government argument can only go so far- what do you wanna do, give private militias the same technology our army uses? how about nuclear bombs?

No need for guns in a movie theatre. Guns are inherently unsafe, why would I want that? I'd rather live in a society in which we are not constantly in fear of protecting ourselves, but maybe that's just me. I'm afraid of the psychological effects of carrying a gun with you everywhere you go, and if it predisposes you to use guns in situations that could be handled differently (the problem of 'if I have a hammer, all problems look like nails')

I'd suppose the people most vociferously opposed to guns (thieving politicians, most transparent administration ever etc.) are those most afraid of an armed society.

[jude2]

Jesse is a true bad ass.

[haider]

I'd suppose the people most vociferously opposed to guns (thieving politicians, most transparent administration ever etc.) are those most afraid of an armed society.

I suppose those who are paranoid delusional (right wingers, fox news) are the ones who most vociferously want more guns in society.

I can play this game all day long 

[ChopperRider]

I suppose those who are paranoid delusional (right wingers, fox news) are the ones who most vociferously want more guns in society.

I can play this game all day long 

Except you can't make up your mind.

Guns are inherently unsafe? No, the human behind the trigger is.

Against guns, or against people carrying guns in public? Because one is certainly not the other.

Against a Constitutional right of protection? Or a believer in the idyllic make believe fantasy world the liberal left is spoon feeding you?

I think you've watched Avatar a few too many times, it has softened your brain.

[haider]

Except you can't make up your mind.

Guns are inherently unsafe? No, the human behind the trigger is.

Against guns, or against people carrying guns in public? Because one is certainly not the other.

Against a Constitutional right of protection? Or a believer in the idyllic make believe fantasy world the liberal left is spoon feeding you?

I think you've watched Avatar a few too many times, it has softened your brain.

I think you've watched a few too many clips of Jesse Ventura, it has stripped your ability to have a coherent dialogue.

If we're just playing games, I'll play 

[Palpatine Q]

Except you can't make up your mind.

Guns are inherently unsafe? No, the human behind the trigger is.

Against guns, or against people carrying guns in public? Because one is certainly not the other.

Against a Constitutional right of protection? Or a believer in the idyllic make believe fantasy world the liberal left is spoon feeding you?

I think you've watched Avatar a few too many times, it has softened your brain.

i'd say a device whose sole purpose is to shoot lethal projectiles is inherently unsafe.


guns........our furry friends

[ChopperRider]

I think you've watched a few too many clips of Jesse Ventura, it has stripped your ability to have a coherent dialogue.

If we're just playing games, I'll play 

We're not having a dialogue.

You're only able to post idiotic retorts. No fault of mine, your parents were probably a bit subnormal.

So let's start with where you think the author's of the 2nd Amendment were wrong and why.

I'll wait.

[kh300]

If someone told me that banning all guns would mean not one more person would get killed from them. I'd gladly hand over my guns.

Idiots like this guy think these psychos just snap and go on a shooting spree. These guys plan out these things, and will take as long as they want to do it. If they get denied buying a gun they'll figure out a way to get one,and there are millions of them to get easily.

[haider]

We're not having a dialogue.

You're only able to post idiotic retorts. No fault of mine, your parents were probably a bit subnormal.

So let's start with where you think the author's of the 2nd Amendment were wrong and why.

I'll wait.

Really? where?

I was purposely reflecting your behavior you thick cunt  

To start with, is this the kind of 'retort' you're referring to?:

I'd suppose the people most vociferously opposed to guns (thieving politicians, most transparent administration ever etc.) are those most afraid of an armed society.

You haven't addressed any of my points, so why should I address any of your questions?  

[ChopperRider]

Really? where?

I was purposely reflecting your behavior you thick cunt  

To start with, is this the kind of 'retort' you're referring to?:
You haven't addressed any of my points, so why should I address any of your questions?  

Your points?

Are you carrying on an alternate conversation in your head? Because you've made no point here. Your position is that you personally don't like guns, so you think your personal opinion should overrule the rights of everyone else.

I can't help it your uneasy around guns. Most Momma's boys are I suppose.

[ChopperRider]

i'd say a device whose sole purpose is to shoot lethal projectiles is inherently unsafe.


guns........our furry friends

You should know better, the gun is as safe as the person operating it.

Kinda like a car, but only way less likely of ever harming anyone.

[ChopperRider]

We're not having a dialogue.

You're only able to post idiotic retorts. No fault of mine, your parents were probably a bit subnormal.

So let's start with where you think the author's of the 2nd Amendment were wrong and why.

I'll wait.

Yo "haider" come out and play.

I am eager to see how you would rewrite The Constitution.

[Radical Plato]

Your points?

Are you carrying on an alternate conversation in your head? Because you've made no point here. Your position is that you personally don't like guns, so you think your personal opinion should overrule the rights of everyone else.

I can't help it your uneasy around guns. Most Momma's boys are I suppose.

People don't like being around insecure little men with guns.  From my experience, it is the men who feel insecure and unable to stand up to other men on an equal basis who feel the need to have guns.  Essentially, if you're a scared little man afraid of bigger stronger men, the simplest solution is to buy a gun, you can then behave the way strong secure men do who don't need the gun.  For me, only a Mommas boy would want a gun, the gun could be seen as a substitute for the parental protection the child once enjoyed, the gun is the equivalent of the night-light for the child afraid to sleep in the dark..  A man who is prepared to face life head on, using his wits and his brawn as a weapon, is far more secure than some douchbeag who HIDES behind the gun.