Author Topic: ronnie coleman and phil heath, evolution of bodybuilding (Read 18841 times)

Don't fall for this.

Having a good physique doesn't mean you have to have the greatest physique ever.

And anyway, Ronnie Coleman only had a good physique for a few years. In the latter half of his 'reign' he was a bloated sack who seemed to be working on making it worse.

So far, Phil Heath hasn't ruined his physique.

Anglo · « **Reply #12 on:** December 29, 2012, 05:11:12 AM »

Quote from: erics on December 29, 2012, 03:47:01 AM

Don't fall for this.

Having a good physique doesn't mean you have to have the greatest physique ever.

And anyway, Ronnie Coleman only had a good physique for a few years. In the latter half of his 'reign' he was a bloated sack who seemed to be working on making it worse.

So far, Phil Heath hasn't ruined his physique.

Hi Rimjob

Skeletor · « **Reply #13 on:** December 29, 2012, 05:14:04 AM »

Quote from: Tito24 on December 29, 2012, 03:26:17 AM

bob chick and dennis james should be shot military style for these remarks. what a bunch of retards.

What did they say?

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #14 on:** December 29, 2012, 05:15:33 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on December 28, 2012, 08:23:26 PM

9-17-11
Dennis James: Phil Heath Looked Best of All Time; Better Than Flex, Ronnie

Bodybuilders are so fickle
Short list of bbers Phil
Will never look better than IMO
Cormier
Kevin
Flex
Shawn
Yates
Coleman
Nasser
That's off the top of my head

Dennis James especially chats so much shit

Skeletor · « **Reply #15 on:** December 29, 2012, 05:17:19 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on December 29, 2012, 05:15:33 AM

Bodybuilders are so fickle
Short list of bbers Phil
Will never look better than IMO
Cormier
Kevin
Flex
Shawn
Yates
Coleman
Nasser
That's off the top of my head

Dennis James especially chats so much shit

Wow.
Does DJ have any beef with Ronnie is is he just friends with Heath?

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #16 on:** December 29, 2012, 05:27:12 AM »

Throw dexter in there too

OTHstrong · « **Reply #17 on:** December 29, 2012, 05:34:48 AM »

Quote from: erics on December 29, 2012, 03:47:01 AM

Don't fall for this.

Having a good physique doesn't mean you have to have the greatest physique ever.

And anyway, Ronnie Coleman only had a good physique for a few years. In the latter half of his 'reign' he was a bloated sack who seemed to be working on making it worse.

So far, Phil Heath hasn't ruined his physique.

No IFBB judge on the planet would take Phil`s best over any one of the 8 versions Ronnie displayed on the Olympia stage. Phil may have a lot of people saying he looks better but from an opinion and preference point of view, certainly not from an IFBB judging point of view.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #18 on:** December 29, 2012, 06:20:21 AM »

Quote from: Onetimehard on December 29, 2012, 05:34:48 AM

No IFBB judge on the planet would take Phil`s best over any one of the 8 versions Ronnie displayed on the Olympia stage. Phil may have a lot of people saying he looks better but from an opinion and preference point of view, certainly not from an IFBB judging point of view.

No one says Phil is better 99.9% of people with eyesight can see Ronnie is waaay better.... I've seen Phil in person ... Not that impressive as other pros I've seen and he was in a vest... Look past the arms... In person too the lack of width there is no hiding that....
His onstage conditioning great ... Good muscle shape

erics · « **Reply #19 on:** December 29, 2012, 01:02:06 PM »

Ronnie was a beast but he looked like garbage during the latter half.

His first couple of Olympias were incredible. Of course he would beat Heath. Even a fool who believes in Zeus can see that.

And so? Heath hasn't screwed over his physique yet. He looks good. Ronnie did screw his physique over by trying to get bigger. Heath hasn't made that mistake yet. Anyone who doesn't make that mistake is a 'better bodybuilder' than Coleman.

Only alpha males who dream of gorilla positioning don't understand that it doesn't matter if Phil Heath is not 'the greatest ever'.