Gun Nut Myths

[Benny B]

 

Jan 8, 2013

Cable news is now featuring freaks that are comparing the idea of gun control to what happened under the Third Reich...  which from their point of view, was basically the tragic story of a crazed dictator denying people guns. Hitler’s priority wasn’t to ban the selling of high-capacity ammunition clips. He was too busy suppressing minorities and crushing the unions—the same things that today’s conservatives are obsessed with.

Despite the fantasies, of gun nuts, Adolf Hitler never enacted a ban on guns. Guns weren’t the first thing Adolf Hitler went after. In fact, he never got around to going after guns—and Adolf Hitler found the time to go after a LOT of things. Hitler knew that guns don’t free people from tyranny—people free people from tyranny. So he went after the people who would oppose him—like union members.

   
A new ad from an ammo company called USAAmmo compares President Obama to tyrants like Hitler and Stalin. I’m shocked. Mostly, I’m shocked that an ammo company feels the need to advertise. Isn’t that stuff flying off of the shelves? The video with the ad claims that the President and Attorney General Eric Holder “are secretly conspiring American Citizens of the right to bear arms.” This ad is based on inciting fear and paranoia among people who are completely misinformed. Give the ammo company this much—they know their customers. A spokesman for USAAmmo said Obama is “anti-gun and he’s obviously a socialist cramming healthcare down America’s throats.” Obama is cramming healthcare down America’s throats! Well a lot of good all those guns are doing you guys—you can’t even prevent yourselves from being given affordable h ealthcare!

Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell refuses to say if he would use the debt ceiling as a weapon... which is just another way of using the debt ceiling as a weapon. Republicans will always use any weapon they have. This is the party of 2nd Amendment solutions. They love weapons. The reason is obvious—if you don’t have the numbers, you better have the guns. It’s not easy running the country with a tiny base of elderly white men in the rural south. You have to be armed with things like assault rifles and debt ceilings. 


 

[TrueBB93]

HeS TrYiNg tO TaKe aWaY tHe GuNz! gEt HiM!

[arce1988]

  Stalin saved the World.

[Benny B]

Biden's Task Force is suited and booted!  Here are there proposals for gun safety:

[Irongrip400]

Hmm, so the blueprint for taking over as dictator is to first bust the unions, then take the guns of the people. Next step is obviously to get rid of Jews. Got it, thanks Benny. 

[WOOO]

Americants are nuts.

[Shockwave]

Biden's Task Force is suited and booted!  Here are there proposals for gun safety:

Lol, penalties for carrying firearms in an already "firearm free" zone. Zomg, I'm sure that will do wonders.


What a fucking idiot.

As far as the others go... No real complaints except for the "database". That is horseshit. Background checks and mental health checks sound fine, but I'd be interested to know the specifics.

[The True Adonis]

[doison]

So blacks kill too much...but homicide rates in general have dropped quite substantially over the past 30 years?


But I thought gun murders were a recent phenomenon?

[The True Adonis]

So blacks kill too much...but homicide rates in general have dropped quite substantially over the past 30 years?


But I thought gun murders were a recent phenomenon?

They aren`t and guns are a great defense against any race, especially the ones that like to commit the most homicides.

[doison]

They aren`t and guns are a great defense against any race, especially the ones that like to commit the most homicides.

Why do we need guns if homicide rates are decreasing?  Clearly this is because the number of guns have decreased over the past 30 years. 

Since the number of guns has dropped as the homicide rate has dropped, it stands to reason that banning guns will completely eradicate homicides.

How many million less guns are owned today as compared to 30 years ago when homicide rates were so much higher?  1 million?  10 million?

[The True Adonis]

Why do we need guns if homicide rates are decreasing?  Clearly this is because the number of guns have decreased over the past 30 years. 

Since the number of guns has dropped as the homicide rate has dropped, it stands to reason that banning guns will completely eradicate homicides.

How many million less guns are owned today as compared to 30 years ago when homicide rates were so much higher?  1 million?  10 million?

The number of firearms has only increased coupled with better gun laws, such as Castle Doctrine in many states.

[doison]

The number of firearms has only increased coupled with better gun laws, such as Castle Doctrine in many states.

No..that can't be true because homicide rates have DECREASED.  How can homicide rates go down if gun numbers go up.  Think about it...it's unpossible.

[The True Adonis]

No..that can't be true because homicide rates have DECREASED.  How can homicide rates go down if gun numbers go up.  Think about it...it's unpossible.

[CatInHat]

Jan 8, 2013

Cable news is now featuring freaks that are comparing the idea of gun control to what happened under the Third Reich...  which from their point of view, was basically the tragic story of a crazed dictator denying people guns. Hitler’s priority wasn’t to ban the selling of high-capacity ammunition clips. He was too busy suppressing minorities and crushing the unions—the same things that today’s conservatives are obsessed with.

Despite the fantasies, of gun nuts, Adolf Hitler never enacted a ban on guns. Guns weren’t the first thing Adolf Hitler went after. In fact, he never got around to going after guns—and Adolf Hitler found the time to go after a LOT of things. Hitler knew that guns don’t free people from tyranny—people free people from tyranny. So he went after the people who would oppose him—like union members.

  
A new ad from an ammo company called USAAmmo compares President Obama to tyrants like Hitler and Stalin. I’m shocked. Mostly, I’m shocked that an ammo company feels the need to advertise. Isn’t that stuff flying off of the shelves? The video with the ad claims that the President and Attorney General Eric Holder “are secretly conspiring American Citizens of the right to bear arms.” This ad is based on inciting fear and paranoia among people who are completely misinformed. Give the ammo company this much—they know their customers. A spokesman for USAAmmo said Obama is “anti-gun and he’s obviously a socialist cramming healthcare down America’s throats.” Obama is cramming healthcare down America’s throats! Well a lot of good all those guns are doing you guys—you can’t even prevent yourselves from being given affordable h ealthcare!

Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell refuses to say if he would use the debt ceiling as a weapon... which is just another way of using the debt ceiling as a weapon. Republicans will always use any weapon they have. This is the party of 2nd Amendment solutions. They love weapons. The reason is obvious—if you don’t have the numbers, you better have the guns. It’s not easy running the country with a tiny base of elderly white men in the rural south. You have to be armed with things like assault rifles and debt ceilings.  


 

shut up nig

[doison]

Well...either way, guns are still the reason for people being died.  Homicide rates may have dropped as gun ownership has increased, but the only logical stance is that less guns would mean even less homicides...regardless of what the data says.

[Soul Crusher]

Get off welfare moron.  Tired of paying for you 

Jan 8, 2013

Cable news is now featuring freaks that are comparing the idea of gun control to what happened under the Third Reich...  which from their point of view, was basically the tragic story of a crazed dictator denying people guns. Hitler’s priority wasn’t to ban the selling of high-capacity ammunition clips. He was too busy suppressing minorities and crushing the unions—the same things that today’s conservatives are obsessed with.

Despite the fantasies, of gun nuts, Adolf Hitler never enacted a ban on guns. Guns weren’t the first thing Adolf Hitler went after. In fact, he never got around to going after guns—and Adolf Hitler found the time to go after a LOT of things. Hitler knew that guns don’t free people from tyranny—people free people from tyranny. So he went after the people who would oppose him—like union members.

   
A new ad from an ammo company called USAAmmo compares President Obama to tyrants like Hitler and Stalin. I’m shocked. Mostly, I’m shocked that an ammo company feels the need to advertise. Isn’t that stuff flying off of the shelves? The video with the ad claims that the President and Attorney General Eric Holder “are secretly conspiring American Citizens of the right to bear arms.” This ad is based on inciting fear and paranoia among people who are completely misinformed. Give the ammo company this much—they know their customers. A spokesman for USAAmmo said Obama is “anti-gun and he’s obviously a socialist cramming healthcare down America’s throats.” Obama is cramming healthcare down America’s throats! Well a lot of good all those guns are doing you guys—you can’t even prevent yourselves from being given affordable h ealthcare!

Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell refuses to say if he would use the debt ceiling as a weapon... which is just another way of using the debt ceiling as a weapon. Republicans will always use any weapon they have. This is the party of 2nd Amendment solutions. They love weapons. The reason is obvious—if you don’t have the numbers, you better have the guns. It’s not easy running the country with a tiny base of elderly white men in the rural south. You have to be armed with things like assault rifles and debt ceilings. 


 

[The True Adonis]

Well...either way, guns are still the reason for people being died.  Homicide rates may have dropped as gun ownership has increased, but the only logical stance is that less guns would mean even less homicides...regardless of what the data says.

ORLY?

[leadhead]

Well...either way, guns are still the reason for people being died.  Homicide rates may have dropped as gun ownership has increased, but the only logical stance is that less guns would mean even less homicides...regardless of what the data says.

Really- Because guns kill people, not other people USING guns huh? 

[Shockwave]

Really- Because guns kill people, not other people USING guns huh?  

Actually, I was laying in bed last night, and I hear a loud gunshot... Sure enough, I run outside, and my sidearm is laying in the street smoking, fucking thing was sleep walking again and shot another vagrant. I'm at a loss, I just don't know what to do, my sidearm just refuses to listen to me and leave it's magazine in the safe.

[The True Adonis]

Actually, I was laying in bed last night, and I hear a loud gunshot... Sure enough, I run outside, and my sidearm is laying in the street smoking, fucking thing went walking again sleeping walking and shot another vagrant. I'm at a loss, I just don't know what to do, my sidearm just refuses to listen to me and leave it's magazine in the safe.

Happened to me last night, except mine shot the last Lemon Muffin when I went to eat it.  How do I train it to not do that? 

[doison]

Really- Because guns kill people, not other people USING guns huh? 

Thank you.
I was beginning to think I was the only sane person here.  

Why make it easy for mean people to kill you?  Mental illness is not a choice!  Why punish those who are already suffering with mental illness by giving them an easy outlet to harm others?  

If homicide rates have decreased as gun numbers have increased, we can all agree that acts if homicide could be entirely eradicated if guns were also eradicated.

[The True Adonis]

Thank you.
I was beginning to think I was the only sane person here.  

Why make it easy for mean people to kill you?  Mental illness is not a choice!  Why punish those who are already suffering with mental illness by giving them an easy outlet to harm others?  

If homicide rates have decreased as gun numbers have increased, we can all agree that acts if homicide could be entirely eradicated if guns were also eradicated.

[doison]

[SF1900]

I think what he is saying if you completely ban guns, there will be no homicides bc no one will have guns to kill other people.

I guess you cant use a knife, bat, or crowbar or your hands to kill someone.