|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: January 17, 2013, 01:53:34 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whork
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: January 17, 2013, 02:03:48 PM » |
|
How is it ok for the presidents kids to have armed guards at their school but armed guards at public schools where children of private citizens should not?
Because armed guards at schools would mean more government employes = increased spending. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: January 17, 2013, 02:06:34 PM » |
|
So his kids are more important than other kids?
Do those other kids not face the threat of being shot just like his?
I armed guards are out in plae to stop his kids from being harmed why are you and others opposed to having armed guards protect private citizens kids?
Obviously it works, when was the last time a presidents kids where murdered?
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: January 17, 2013, 02:09:52 PM » |
|
Because armed guards at schools would mean more government employes = increased spending.  So you're not against the idea just worried about the spending then? Certain things deserve spending whork, we all know you belief that the govt is so efficient that we couldn't cut anything without ppl losing jobs or service suffering but it just isn't true. We could also start by making schools substations for police departments. There certainly wouldn't be enough to cover all schools but it would be a start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
whork
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: January 17, 2013, 02:10:16 PM » |
|
So his kids are more important than other kids?
Do those other kids not face the threat of being shot just like his?
I armed guards are out in plae to stop his kids from being harmed why are you and others opposed to having armed guards protect private citizens kids?
Obviously it works, when was the last time a presidents kids where murdered?
You could make the same argument about the president being protected by armed guards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
whork
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: January 17, 2013, 02:11:28 PM » |
|
So you're not against the idea just worried about the spending then?
Certain things deserve spending whork, we all know you belief that the govt is so efficient that we couldn't cut anything without ppl losing jobs or service suffering but it just isn't true.
We could also start by making schools substations for police departments. There certainly wouldn't be enough to cover all schools but it would be a start.
Make schools substations for police departments?
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: January 17, 2013, 02:13:38 PM » |
|
So his kids are more important than other kids?
Do those other kids not face the threat of being shot just like his?
I armed guards are out in plae to stop his kids from being harmed why are you and others opposed to having armed guards protect private citizens kids?
Obviously it works, when was the last time a presidents kids where murdered? [/quote
yep his kids would be more of a target then my kids just because he's the pres,i can't believe i even have to explain this
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: January 17, 2013, 02:16:32 PM » |
|
You could make the same argument about the president being protected by armed guards.
agreed and I do, if has he ability to protect himself with guns why shouldn't I?
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: January 17, 2013, 02:19:57 PM » |
|
why can't you get a concealed weapons permit,do you have a record
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2013, 02:21:49 PM » |
|
Lol where did I deny that his kids are bigger targets?
Do you deny that our kids are targets to be killed as well?
If not then why is it good and accepted that obamas kids are guarded by guns but not private citizens?
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: January 17, 2013, 02:35:17 PM » |
|
why can't you get a concealed weapons permit,do you have a record
I was making a point, I do have the ability to defend myself with a gun. Obamas kids have the ability to be protected while at school why should private citizens be different, you agree that normal kids are targets?
|
|
|
|
|
|
blacken700
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: January 17, 2013, 02:39:32 PM » |
|
if has he ability to protect himself with guns why shouldn't I? you do,right 
|
|
|
|
|
Pray_4_War
Getbig IV
   
Gender: 
Posts: 1051
High Speed, Low Drag
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: January 17, 2013, 03:27:55 PM » |
|
I'm silly I guess. I believe the lives of regular kids are just as important as the lives of children of the ruling class. Pro-abortion liberals usually disagree. Regular children seem to have less reason to be specifically targeted than the child of the President. However, it happens all the time. Mentally unstable kids go to school with guns looking for a student or group of students to get revenge on. In case you didn't notice, it's regular children that are getting shot to hell all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
whork
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: January 17, 2013, 04:02:55 PM » |
|
agreed and I do, if has he ability to protect himself with guns why shouldn't I?
You have the ability to protect yourself you own several guns. You can even hire bodyguards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: January 17, 2013, 04:33:43 PM » |
|
You have the ability to protect yourself you own several guns.
You can even hire bodyguards.
if has he ability to protect himself with guns why shouldn't I? you do,right  agreed and the presidents kids have the ability to have armed guards at their schools to protect them so why should private citizens kids be any different you guys agree that normal kids are also targets but you seem to want to deny them the same priviledges as the presidents kids...
|
|
|
|
|
|
whork
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: January 17, 2013, 05:28:59 PM » |
|
agreed and the presidents kids have the ability to have armed guards at their schools to protect them so why should private citizens kids be any different
you guys agree that normal kids are also targets but you seem to want to deny them the same priviledges as the presidents kids...
Not at all if it can save lifes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option D
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: January 17, 2013, 05:35:38 PM » |
|
hahahahaha that commercial is retarded... how in the fuck did that make it to the TV
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option D
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: January 17, 2013, 05:37:38 PM » |
|
So his kids are more important than other kids?
Do those other kids not face the threat of being shot just like his?
I armed guards are out in plae to stop his kids from being harmed why are you and others opposed to having armed guards protect private citizens kids?
Obviously it works, when was the last time a presidents kids where murdered?
Important... no... But i mean you have to understand the reason his kids have guards...
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: January 17, 2013, 05:53:05 PM » |
|
Important... no... But i mean you have to understand the reason his kids have guards...
I absolutely understand the reason his kids have guards. What I dont understand is why ppl are opposed to private citizens kids having armed guards at their schools? His kids are bigger targets I understand but dont you agree that normal kids are targets as well? president obama and democrats sure do, so why should their kids be allowed to have armed guards at schools but not private citizens? do you not see the hypocrisey there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fury
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: January 17, 2013, 06:03:36 PM » |
|
Important... no... But i mean you have to understand the reason his kids have guards...
Irrelevant. The school had armed guards before Obama's kids were enrolled there. NBC's David Gregory has no problem sending his kid there while railing against the same thing for everyone else's kids. Laughable how you sheeple defend your elitist overlords who would throw you into the killing fields at the earliest moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option D
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: January 17, 2013, 08:42:22 PM » |
|
Irrelevant. The school had armed guards before Obama's kids were enrolled there. NBC's David Gregory has no problem sending his kid there while railing against the same thing for everyone else's kids.
Laughable how you sheeple defend your elitist overlords who would throw you into the killing fields at the earliest moment.
yeah that was needed..
|
|
|
|
|
|
JBGRAY
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: January 17, 2013, 09:57:23 PM » |
|
Photo ops with children to push an agenda must sway a lot of American's minds towards more gun control laws. If all it takes is sound bites and pictures of kids with the president to push restrictive new laws, then all I can say that Americans deserve the government that they get.
I don't get mad at Obama, or any other government official anymore. Obviously, this is what my fellow Americans want:
- they want free shit - handouts - housing, food, utility bills paid by uncle sam - free school - more free shit
Fuck Americans, and according to George Carlin, "fuck the children."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emmortal
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: January 17, 2013, 10:40:03 PM » |
|
So his kids are more important than other kids?
Do those other kids not face the threat of being shot just like his?
I armed guards are out in plae to stop his kids from being harmed why are you and others opposed to having armed guards protect private citizens kids?
Obviously it works, when was the last time a presidents kids where murdered?
If you put it on the scale of importance, yes, the children of the leader of the most powerful nation in the world are more important than yours or mine. Why? Because their lives can be used as leverage against him, cause him to have clouded judgement and all kinds of other shit we don't need our president dealing with. It's a tough thought to swallow, because on a personal level I don't feel that way, just viewing it from the big picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: January 18, 2013, 04:47:59 AM » |
|
If you put it on the scale of importance, yes, the children of the leader of the most powerful nation in the world are more important than yours or mine. Why? Because their lives can be used as leverage against him, cause him to have clouded judgement and all kinds of other shit we don't need our president dealing with.
It's a tough thought to swallow, because on a personal level I don't feel that way, just viewing it from the big picture.
I can agree with that, but the fact is the kids of private citizens are targets as well. Everyone agrees from the president to congress, so if their children have armed guards at schools why shouldnt private citizens?
|
|
|
|
|
|
NeoSeminole
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: January 18, 2013, 06:25:28 AM » |
|
hahahahahahahah because they're the kids of the pres of the u.sa. if you can't see the difference then there is no hope for you Show me how many assassination attempts there have been on past Presidents' kids
|
|
|
|
|
|