Author Topic: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?  (Read 9334 times)

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31826
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« on: January 21, 2013, 08:21:47 AM »
The news keeps on calling today's Black party as historic.  I don't see why since he's already won and was the first "mulatto" president 4 years ago.  What is "historic" about this other than the estimate $300 million cost to throw.


AC Slater

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1176
  • The king of Bayside
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2013, 08:24:53 AM »
.
I dont like twinks.

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23394
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2013, 08:41:59 AM »
It's "historic" because they've run out of ideas a long time ago and there's not much beside bad news that they can show.
.

Batfreak

  • Competitors
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
  • Getbig!
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2013, 08:59:57 AM »
because it is on NND......
the original

rachaelsnav

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 79
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2013, 11:26:44 AM »
Because it is the end

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59595
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2013, 11:28:10 AM »
Because its four more years of historic disasters.

Method101

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8454
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2013, 11:28:48 AM »
he's the first half white president.

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2013, 11:40:32 AM »
Because he has been historically bad and disastrous

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2013, 11:43:20 AM »
Because its four more years of historic disasters.

Repubs should have nominated Jeb and/or Christie.

All the heavyweights - even Palin - sat out in 2012.   They knew an incumbent is nearly unbeatable.  The only incumbent to lose in the last 30 years was Bush1.... and without Perot in the race, he wrecks CLinton.

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2013, 11:45:23 AM »

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2013, 11:47:47 AM »
Repubs should have nominated Jeb and/or Christie.

All the heavyweights - even Palin - sat out in 2012.   They knew an incumbent is nearly unbeatable.  The only incumbent to lose in the last 30 years was Bush1.... and without Perot in the race, he wrecks CLinton.
Heavyweights nothing! I could out-debate Palin. Now. Cold.And so could most Getbiggers, our exceptions noted.

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2013, 12:02:53 PM »


MLK day, not another brotha in sight  ::) ::)

Do these Uncle Toms actually associate themselves with other blacks nowadys???



The_Hammer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
  • President Barack Obama -- 2 Term U.S. President
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2013, 12:20:35 PM »
LOL, I reckon Secret Service doesn't give a shit about Laura Bush anymore?  ;D



Mitch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4050
  • Team Succulent Ham of Peace
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2013, 12:26:11 PM »
It's "historic" because they've run out of ideas a long time ago and there's not much beside bad news that they can show.
and entertainment ! Time to grab some pop-corn before running out of it. 8)

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2013, 12:30:35 PM »
LOL, I reckon Secret Service doesn't give a shit about Laura Bush anymore?  ;D



Pretty sure it's the angle. I'm sure there are 'x's where they are obliged to stand. And, given Laura's stand on literacy, I'd give her a pass with regards to George.  :)

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2013, 12:48:20 PM »
Are the big sheets of glass a customary US thing? So the people can see them better or something?

The_Hammer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
  • President Barack Obama -- 2 Term U.S. President
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2013, 01:10:26 PM »
Are the big sheets of glass a customary US thing? So the people can see them better or something?

Yeah, it makes the speaker look more muscular.

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2013, 01:11:44 PM »
Yeah, it makes the speaker look more muscular.

LOOL fig'd it'd be something like that  :)

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2013, 01:13:22 PM »
Over here in Europe, we all love Obama !!   :D :D

Good thing that Christian dude didn't win.
Thank God Obama is an atheist !

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59595
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2013, 03:32:03 PM »
Yet the people who voted for him have no idea why and, again, have no clue of the consequences of their actions. I would actually be in favor of some government assistance for retarded liberals.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #20 on: January 21, 2013, 03:36:17 PM »
Yet the people who voted for him have no idea why and, again, have no clue of the consequences of their actions. I would actually be in favor of some government assistance for retarded liberals.
How's that balance sheet looking, Coach?

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59595
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #21 on: January 21, 2013, 03:38:22 PM »
How's that balance sheet looking, Coach?

Ask me again in Feb when my taxes are filed for 2012.

ChopperRider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4767
  • Ugly, bald Shitso scalp for sale = $1
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #22 on: January 21, 2013, 03:39:27 PM »
The news keeps on calling today's Black party as historic.  I don't see why since he's already won and was the first "mulatto" president 4 years ago.  What is "historic" about this other than the estimate $300 million cost to throw.


That 800,000 of his supporters showed up and not one of them had to miss a day of work to do it.

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #23 on: January 21, 2013, 03:40:19 PM »
maybe they mean it's an historic feat, to mix up the words, on two consecutive inaugurations


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59595
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Why is Obama's inauguration considered "Historic"?
« Reply #24 on: January 21, 2013, 03:40:29 PM »
But as said before, I'm Obama proof. He and his cronies can Fuck themselves.