Author Topic: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars  (Read 3251 times)

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« on: January 21, 2013, 02:02:26 PM »
now they couldve fixed the economy by starting 65, 2 million dollar buisnesses


they couldve just done some online webcast of the inaguration in the whitehouse

i guess times are not that tuff maybe i should work less myself
A

TrueBB93

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2013, 02:03:30 PM »
run for to pres next time falcon, ill vote for you

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2013, 02:09:02 PM »
run for to pres next time falcon, ill vote for you

they should be screaming about this on the news, but everyone just goes along with the flow, insane world. there should be protests at the inaguration, an oppositition presence should be known. these occupiers need to be there, doesnt make sense
A

TrueBB93

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2013, 02:11:13 PM »
they should be screaming about this on the news, but everyone just goes along with the flow, insane world. there should be protests at the inaguration, an oppositition presence should be known. these occupiers need to be there, doesnt make sense

ALOT of things going in the world today dont make sense, dont you think?

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2013, 02:14:41 PM »
ALOT of things going in the world today dont make sense, dont you think?

it is so wrong and there are throwing it in our faces, the people that know what is going on are the very few IMO i dont hear anyone complaining about this inogruation thing and to me thats mind boggiling
A

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2013, 02:30:43 PM »
You can't put a price on events like this, they instill national pride, especially after the recent tragic events . It's like the queen's jubilee in the UK, great for national morale , the nation can come together and celebrate the great leader... :D

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2013, 02:46:58 PM »
America again have fallen into the hands of Monarchy.  :D

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25841
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2013, 05:38:30 PM »
now they couldve fixed the economy by starting 65, 2 million dollar buisnesses


they couldve just done some online webcast of the inaguration in the whitehouse

i guess times are not that tuff maybe i should work less myself


Actually the inauguation brings in over 130 million in spending dollars from people coming from around the world to see it. ::)
A

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2013, 09:40:22 PM »
  The USA is fucked.

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2013, 06:40:39 AM »
it is so wrong and there are throwing it in our faces, the people that know what is going on are the very few IMO i dont hear anyone complaining about this inogruation thing and to me thats mind boggiling

I was too busy screrwing my wife and watching hockey to care about the Inaguration , Obama's speech or how much the party cost, etc. I suggest you get laid and post to confirm it later on getbig.

pedro01

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4800
  • Hello Hunior
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2013, 06:49:38 AM »
I was too busy screrwing my wife and watching hockey to care about the Inaguration , Obama's speech or how much the party cost, etc. I suggest you get laid and post to confirm it later on getbig.

My wife never lets me watch sports whilst I'm nailing her.

Well played sir.

kh300

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4362
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2013, 07:24:57 AM »
A million people attended the inauguration. But only 15 missed work

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31841
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2013, 07:27:08 AM »
I've been bagging on this for weeks.  Why the need for all this bullshit for a second term?  Why not have some small thing on the white house lawn?  Why so many black celebrities.  Fucking sickening.  Imagine just giving $100k to 1300 schools to hire two extra teachers. The impact would be huge.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2013, 07:36:29 AM »

Actually the inauguation brings in over 130 million in spending dollars from people coming from around the world to see it. ::)

False - by looking at that crowd on sheep - most are on welfare and food stamps anyway - so its all a wash. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41304
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2013, 09:31:44 AM »
Didn't watch. Don't care. It doesn't matter.
7

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #16 on: January 22, 2013, 09:32:21 AM »
Confirmed: Beyoncé Lip-Synced the Star-Spangled Banner

The performer posted pictures of herself rehearsing in a recording studio. By Sophie Gilbert
The Marine Corps Band during Monday’s inaugural ceremony.
Comments (316) | Published January 22, 2013



 
Beyoncé sang the national anthem at yesterday’s inauguration ceremony for President Obama and received overwhelming praise for her performance, ranging from Business Insider (“It was just amazing”) to TMZ (“f*cking awesome”).




Beyoncé’s Instagram photo of herself in a recording studio with members of the Marine Corps Band.
 
But to close observers, it appeared the performer was not singing live. To press seated just below the podium, in front of the “President’s Own” Marine Corps Band, it was evident that the band wasn’t actually playing during the song—even though band director Colonel Michael J. Colburn was conducting energetically and the band members mimicked blowing into their instruments. Separately, at one point during her performance, Beyoncé removed her earpiece.

A hint as to the actual origins of the version Beyoncé sang came from her own hand: On January 20, the day before the ceremony, Beyoncé posted pictures to her Instagram account that appeared to show her in a recording studio. In one, she holds a copy of the sheet music to “The Star Spangled Banner” in front of a microphone attached to a recording device, and in another she sits in front of recording equipment while members of the Marine Corps Band stand clutching sheet music behind her.

Miming along to a pre-recorded track isn’t unheard of at inaugural ceremonies. At President Obama’s 2009 inauguration, cold weather and wind meant that a live performance by cellist Yo-Yo Ma and violinist Itzhak Perlman had to be nixed in favor of a recording. But there are no previously known cases of a singer lip-syncing the national anthem during an inaugural performance.

UPDATE January 22, 11:45 AM: The London Times has confirmed our theory that Beyoncé  was, in fact, lip syncing. See the video via YouTube.

UPDATE January 22, 12:10 PM: "We don't know why Beyoncé decided to use prerecorded music," a spokesperson for the Marine Corps Band told us this morning. "All music [for inaugural ceremonies] is prerecorded as a matter of course, and that's something we've done for years and years. The Marine Band did perform live throughout the ceremony but we received last-minute word that Beyoncé wanted to use the recording." The spokesperson also added that everyone knows Beyoncé is a gifted singer, and her decision has no bearing on her musical ability.
 
For more news, photos, and recaps of the 2013 inaugural festivities, visit our inauguration page.

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23810
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #17 on: January 22, 2013, 09:32:38 AM »
That's a lot of borrowed money to praise the semi anus'd enchanter.
.

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #18 on: January 22, 2013, 01:43:49 PM »

Actually the inauguation brings in over 130 million in spending dollars from people coming from around the world to see it. ::)


dude a 20 dollar or less ticket price doesnt compare to 130 million you retard

A

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: Inaguration cost tax payers 130 million dollars
« Reply #19 on: January 22, 2013, 01:45:12 PM »
this is far above and beyond what beyonce could preform

A