Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
July 23, 2014, 02:53:26 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Rand Paul To Hillary Clinton: 'I Would Have Relieved You Of Your Post'  (Read 1146 times)
Beach Bum
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 40735


View Profile
« on: January 23, 2013, 11:36:04 AM »

He's right.  She should have been fired.

Rand Paul To Hillary Clinton: 'I Would Have Relieved You Of Your Post'
The Huffington Post  |  By Luke Johnson Posted: 01/23/2013 11:39 am EST  |  Updated: 01/23/2013 12:12 pm EST

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) criticized Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Wednesday during the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing over the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

"I'm glad that you're accepting responsibility," said Paul. "I think ultimately with your leaving that you accept the culpability for the worst tragedy since 9/11. And I really mean that."

"Had I been president and found you did not read the cables from Benghazi and from Ambassador Stevens, I would have relieved you of your post. I think it's inexcusable," he said, referencing Clinton's comments that she had not read all of the documentation surrounding the attack.

"I think we can understand you're not reading every cable," Paul said. He added that he didn't suspect Clinton of "bad motives" but said that it was a "failure of leadership."

Clinton responded, "I am the Secretary of State. And the [Accountability Review Board] made very clear that the level of responsibility for the failures that they outlined was set at the Assistant Secretary level and below."

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) rebuked Paul in the next exchange. "If some people on this committee want to call this tragedy the worst since 9/11, it misunderstands the nature of 4000 plus Americans lost in the War in Iraq under false pretenses."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/rand-paul-hillary-clinton_n_2534120.html
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7626


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2013, 11:43:18 AM »

These leftist thugs never take responsibility for their failures.   

The families of the dead will never get answers from this cabal in DC
Report to moderator   Logged
Fury
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21035


All aboard the USS Leverage


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2013, 11:46:25 AM »

He's right.  She should have been fired.

Rand Paul To Hillary Clinton: 'I Would Have Relieved You Of Your Post'
The Huffington Post  |  By Luke Johnson Posted: 01/23/2013 11:39 am EST  |  Updated: 01/23/2013 12:12 pm EST

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) criticized Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Wednesday during the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing over the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

"I'm glad that you're accepting responsibility," said Paul. "I think ultimately with your leaving that you accept the culpability for the worst tragedy since 9/11. And I really mean that."

"Had I been president and found you did not read the cables from Benghazi and from Ambassador Stevens, I would have relieved you of your post. I think it's inexcusable," he said, referencing Clinton's comments that she had not read all of the documentation surrounding the attack.

"I think we can understand you're not reading every cable," Paul said. He added that he didn't suspect Clinton of "bad motives" but said that it was a "failure of leadership."

Clinton responded, "I am the Secretary of State. And the [Accountability Review Board] made very clear that the level of responsibility for the failures that they outlined was set at the Assistant Secretary level and below."

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) rebuked Paul in the next exchange. "If some people on this committee want to call this tragedy the worst since 9/11, it misunderstands the nature of 4000 plus Americans lost in the War in Iraq under false pretenses."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/rand-paul-hillary-clinton_n_2534120.html

He's 100% right. Good for him for saying it.
Report to moderator   Logged
James
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2778


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2013, 04:24:08 PM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHh52PRLIcI" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHh52PRLIcI</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19031


Decepticons! Scramble!


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2013, 04:45:54 PM »

What a savage.
Report to moderator   Logged
Necrosis
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8129


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2013, 04:57:07 PM »

why no outcry for the embassy's raped under bush, multiple ones? this teamster issue is the problem. You can't cherry pick what attacks you will care about depending on which way you lean politically.
Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20273


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2013, 04:58:13 PM »

why no outcry for the embassy's raped under bush, multiple ones? this teamster issue is the problem. You can't cherry pick what attacks you will care about depending on which way you lean politically.

We can't hate Bush and Obama? Huh
Report to moderator   Logged

Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19031


Decepticons! Scramble!


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2013, 05:06:12 PM »

why no outcry for the embassy's raped under bush, multiple ones? this teamster issue is the problem. You can't cherry pick what attacks you will care about depending on which way you lean politically.
Maybe because that's not a current issue? Newsflash - Bush isn't in office, and he hasn't been for almost half a decade. Just because he was a shit ass President doesn't somehow excuse the current crop in office of their fuckups.
Report to moderator   Logged
Skip8282
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 6358



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2013, 06:49:55 PM »

why no outcry for the embassy's raped under bush, multiple ones? this teamster issue is the problem. You can't cherry pick what attacks you will care about depending on which way you lean politically.




If you were a little brighter you might understand that the mere fact it was attacked is not the sticking issue.
Report to moderator   Logged
blacken700
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 10840


Getbig!


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2013, 06:58:08 PM »

rand paul pres hahahahahahahahaa yeah ok  he's doing a little wishful thinking
Report to moderator   Logged
Vince G, CSN MFT
Competitors II
Getbig V
******
Gender: Male
Posts: 13959



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2013, 06:00:52 AM »

rand paul pres hahahahahahahahaa yeah ok  he's doing a little wishful thinking

Yea....like anyone is going to prevent any embassy from being attacked.  Terrorists don't play by rules...they attack schools, churches, funerals, children....etc.  Rand Paul is a dickhead
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7626


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2013, 06:04:08 AM »

Yea....like anyone is going to prevent any embassy from being attacked.  Terrorists don't play by rules...they attack schools, churches, funerals, children....etc.  Rand Paul is a dickhead

LOL!!!!!

Yet you are the same moron calling for gun control here as if criminals play by the rules!   LOL!!!!  Criminals dont play by the rules, they attack homes, old people, children, funerals.

Obama and that C U N T Hitlery are dickheads. 
Report to moderator   Logged
Montague
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11833



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2013, 06:06:06 AM »

Yea....like anyone is going to prevent any embassy from being attacked.  Terrorists don't play by rules...they attack schools, churches, funerals, children....etc.  Rand Paul is a dickhead


Prevention is not the issue being disputed; it's the RESPONSE we're criticizing.
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19031


Decepticons! Scramble!


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2013, 06:22:24 AM »


Prevention is not the issue being disputed; it's the RESPONSE we're criticizing.
Shh. We don't like your logic around here.
Report to moderator   Logged
blacken700
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 10840


Getbig!


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2013, 06:44:06 AM »

paul seems to be back peddling a bit

"Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans?" Clinton said. "What difference, at this point, does it make? It our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."
 
Paul concurred.

"I think she has a little bit of a valid point," he said in an appearance on CNN. "It's not so important whether or not it was movie or what it was. I think what's important, though, in going forward is it not happen again and I think the review board still doesn't get it. I think that we need to have a military commander. We need a Department of Defense in charge of security for embassies in a war zone and nobody has recommended that and I think that's where the ultimate failure is. She has a point about the movie and all of that."
 
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7626


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2013, 06:47:16 AM »

paul seems to be back peddling a bit

"Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans?" Clinton said. "What difference, at this point, does it make? It our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."
 
Paul concurred.

"I think she has a little bit of a valid point," he said in an appearance on CNN. "It's not so important whether or not it was movie or what it was. I think what's important, though, in going forward is it not happen again and I think the review board still doesn't get it. I think that we need to have a military commander. We need a Department of Defense in charge of security for embassies in a war zone and nobody has recommended that and I think that's where the ultimate failure is. She has a point about the movie and all of that."
 

Leftists will defend any lies coming from their slave masters. 
Report to moderator   Logged
blacken700
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 10840


Getbig!


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2013, 06:55:17 AM »

urban
        dictionary


1.

Foxbot

Someone whose mind has been programmed by Fox News and all they can do is regurgitate hyperbole.

Bill is all liberal this and liberal that
Report to moderator   Logged
chadstallion
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2350



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 24, 2013, 07:00:21 AM »

Hillary Clinton to Rand Paul.

and just who are you?
oh, thats right.
a weeny.
Report to moderator   Logged

Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7626


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 24, 2013, 07:02:45 AM »

Hillary Clinton to Rand Paul.

and just who are you?
oh, thats right.
a weeny.

Hillary has been a lying snake and a con woman her entire life. 
Report to moderator   Logged
blacken700
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 10840


Getbig!


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 24, 2013, 07:07:12 AM »

 If John McCain Knew About Benghazi Security Issues WHY DIDN'T HE  SAY OR DO SOMETHING?



During the Senate hearing into the Benghazi attack, Senator John McCain grilled Hillary Clinton about cables she read, when she knew they needed more security, and what the administration was doing during the attack and after, why the President didn’t disclose sensitive information to the public regardless of what the Intellgience asked for, etc. In the midst of this questioning, John McCain says that he knew Chris Stevens well, and that on July 7th, Stevens expressed to McCain his “deep and grave” concerns over security in Libya.
 



Senator McCain: “You knew Chris Stevens very well. I knew him very well. I knew him on July 7th when I went to Libya to observe the elections and at that time, on July 7th, he expressed to me his deep and grave concerns about security particularly in Benghazi. He continued to communicate with the State Department and I don’t know who else as proven in those cables of his deep concern about the security there and the need for additional assistance.”
 



Why didn’t McCain do something about this information? He certainly knows Hillary Clinton well enough to have sent an email. He knew the House Republicans were holding up funding for security in Libya. Why didn’t McCain say anything then?
 

House GOP Was Warned Their Obstruction on Libya Would Embolden Our Enemies
http://www.politicususa.com/fy-republicans-truth-obama-libya-undermined-american-interests.html
 




Conservative policy makers were so alarmed by House Republicans’ actions that they wrote them a letter, warning them that they were emboldening the enemy. They summed their letter up with this, “To cut off funding for current efforts would, in short, be profoundly contrary to American interests.” Surely McCain remembers his friend Lindsay Graham (R-SC) saying House Republicans obstructed Libya because Obama was President. Should McCain not be held to the same standards to which he’s holding the Secretary? It’s not like McCain is not on the Sunday talk shows almost every other weekend. Certainly if McCain had information he thought was relevant, he could have raised a fuss on TV. He could have brought attention to the matter. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton even brought up the congressional holds to aid to Libya and the House holds on bilateral security assistance:
 



Hillary Clinton:

“With respect to helping the Libyans, and that also goes to the question Sen. Rubio asked, we will provide a list of everything we were doing and were attempting to do, but I will also tell you that since March 2011 congressional holds have been placed for many months for aid to Libya. We’ve had frequent congressional complaints. ‘Why are we doing anything for Libya? It is a wealthy country. It has oil.’ Disagreement from some sources that we should have never been part of any UN mission in Libya. Currently, the House has holds on bilateral security assistance, on other kinds of support, for anti-terrorism assistance. So we gotta get our act together between the administration and the congress.”
 



cont'




http://www.politicususa.com/john-mccain-admits-chris-stevens-expressed-deep-concerns-benghazi-security.html
 

Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7626


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 24, 2013, 07:08:45 AM »

The ambassador begged for more security many times and was denied by State Dept. FACT
Report to moderator   Logged
Montague
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11833



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2013, 07:09:22 AM »

Shh. We don't like your logic around here.


Seriously, hardly anyone on this board can DIRECTLY defend a topic. They'll oppose a viewpoint, but their following defense regards something different. Undecided
Report to moderator   Logged
Necrosis
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8129


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 24, 2013, 07:29:50 AM »


Prevention is not the issue being disputed; it's the RESPONSE we're criticizing.

the response was perfectly fine when you look at similar events as a measuring stick. Of all previous embassy attacks this one was actually quickly dealt with in relative terms.

What I think is going on is that the right are creating a scandal where none exists. I think what is being asked for is an impossible especially when you compare it to similar events, there is nothing out of the ordinary. My point about bush was that when similar things, sometimes worse have occurred no one seemed to care, at least not to this degree.

I'm not condoning anything just saying this is clearly teamster politics
Report to moderator   Logged
Vince G, CSN MFT
Competitors II
Getbig V
******
Gender: Male
Posts: 13959



View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: January 24, 2013, 08:11:59 AM »


Prevention is not the issue being disputed; it's the RESPONSE we're criticizing.


We've been responding for 13 fucking years....or maybe we don't have enough Predator drones in the sky.  My issue is that the GOP are blaming Hillary for the attacks as if she had joined the Taliban and opened fire on them. 

Its not about getting answers....its just partisan politics as usual
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7626


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 24, 2013, 08:18:49 AM »


We've been responding for 13 fucking years....or maybe we don't have enough Predator drones in the sky.  My issue is that the GOP are blaming Hillary for the attacks as if she had joined the Taliban and opened fire on them. 

Its not about getting answers....its just partisan politics as usual

 Roll Eyes

Well obvious the communist democrats were not seeking answers either right? 
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!