Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
October 25, 2014, 01:10:53 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CA Police Chief: Guns Are Not a Defensive Weapon.. Watch video... Unbelievable  (Read 412 times)
Hugo Chavez
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 31873


« on: February 16, 2013, 01:51:09 PM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdqWI8HCNf8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdqWI8HCNf8</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21019


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2013, 01:57:04 PM »

haha...

Cops are using their weapons in offense?   Huh
Report to moderator   Logged

Hugo Chavez
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 31873


« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2013, 02:09:46 PM »

haha...

Cops are using their weapons in offense?   Huh
What a clueless moron lol...
Report to moderator   Logged
tonymctones
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 25260



« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2013, 04:42:59 PM »

get ready b/c this will become part of the pro gun legislation rhetoric. Its only a matter of time before we hear it repeated on here.
Report to moderator   Logged
Hugo Chavez
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 31873


« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2013, 05:07:30 PM »

get ready b/c this will become part of the pro gun legislation rhetoric. Its only a matter of time before we hear it repeated on here.
This sort of garbage out of police chiefs around the country has been spewing for a very long time.  99 percent of law enforcement is heavily for as much gun control as they can get.  But for this fool to suggest firearms can't be considered defensive weapons has got to be one of the more ludicrous statements from LE I've heard.
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 9337


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2013, 06:40:51 PM »

This sort of garbage out of police chiefs around the country has been spewing for a very long time.  99 percent of law enforcement is heavily for as much gun control as they can get.  But for this fool to suggest firearms can't be considered defensive weapons has got to be one of the more ludicrous statements from LE I've heard.


This guy is a perfect exams of why I detest most cops , who also share this traitors beliefs.
Report to moderator   Logged
Skip8282
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 6484



« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2013, 09:56:29 AM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdqWI8HCNf8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdqWI8HCNf8</a>

Idiot.
Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15970


Robot


WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2013, 10:46:44 AM »

Police Chiefs vs. Sheriffs.


One is voted in by the people, the other is appointed. You tell me which is which.
Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21019


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2013, 02:06:03 PM »

Police Chiefs vs. Sheriffs.


One is voted in by the people, the other is appointed. You tell me which is which.


THIS!!!
Report to moderator   Logged

Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20630


Decepticons! Scramble!


« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2013, 03:20:55 PM »

Police Chiefs vs. Sheriffs.


One is voted in by the people, the other is appointed. You tell me which is which.

I didn't know that... why the fuck isn't the chief of police elected? How is that even allowed?
Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15970


Robot


WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2013, 05:25:54 PM »

I didn't know that... why the fuck isn't the chief of police elected? How is that even allowed?

It's not a constitutional office.

He is appointed by the Mayor or a council... He is not voted in.

It's always been that way... IE. Terrible.

Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21019


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2013, 08:19:59 PM »

It's not a constitutional office.

He is appointed by the Mayor or a council... He is not voted in.

It's always been that way... IE. Terrible.



I've read that the Sheriff is suppose to be the highest ranking law enforcement in his county (over feds, etc...).

I hope that's true
Report to moderator   Logged

Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20630


Decepticons! Scramble!


« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2013, 08:26:03 PM »

I've read that the Sheriff is suppose to be the highest ranking law enforcement in his county (over feds, etc...).

I hope that's true
Probably supposed to be, but the Fed's will never allow a state authority to "usurp" their authority, even if it's unconstitutional.
Report to moderator   Logged
tonymctones
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 25260



« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2013, 08:27:04 PM »

I've read that the Sheriff is suppose to be the highest ranking law enforcement in his county (over feds, etc...).

I hope that's true
I do believe this is true, if you want to own class 3 restricted items and you dont have a trust you have to get your application approved by the highest ranking law enforcement official in your jurisdiction I believe that is the sheriff if I am not mistaken.

Ive havent had to deal with it but from what I hear thats the procedure.
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 9337


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2013, 10:59:27 AM »

Chicago Police Chief: Second Amendment Is A Danger To Public Safety



By: Dana Loesch (Diary)  |  February 17th, 2013 at 07:21 PM  |  29

RESIZE: AAA



Chicago’s Chief of Police, who previously blamed ”government-sponsored racism” and Sarah Palin for Chicago’s gun violence, declared that the law-ful exercise of the Second Amendment was a threat to public safety. From the Illinois State Rifle Association:
 

Chicago’s embattled police superintendent dug himself deeper into a pit of controversy today by claiming that lawful firearm owners are agents of political corruption.  Appearing on a Chicago Sunday morning talk show, superintendent Garry McCarthy expressed his conviction that firearm owners who lobby their elected representatives or who donate money to political campaigns are engaged in corruption that endangers public safety.  McCarthy went on to express his belief that judges and legislators should rely on public opinion polls when interpreting our Constitution.
 
After totally dismissing the citizen’s right to redress grievances, McCarthy trained his constitutional wisdom on the 2nd Amendment.  Despite recent court decisions to the contrary, McCarthy opined that the 2ndAmendment limits citizens to owning smooth-bore muskets.  McCarthy went on to say that he believes that the 2nd Amendment supports mandatory liability insurance for firearm owners and the mandatory application of GPS tracking devices to civilian owned firearms.
 
“ Garry McCarthy ’s understanding of our Constitution barely qualifies him as a meter maid, never mind the chief of the nation’s third largest police department,” commented ISRA Executive Director Richard Pearson .  “What on earth would possess McCarthy to assert that constitutional rights should be meted out based on public opinion polls?  Let’s not forget that public opinion polls once opposed a woman’s right to vote while it would be a safe bet that, at one time, polls would have shown lynching as an acceptable form of justice.  It has been said that our Constitution exists to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.  McCarthy’s view of our Constitution is dangerous and unbecoming of a civil servant.”
 
“McCarthy needs to understand that the lawful firearm owners of this state will continue to lobby their representatives and continue to support candidates who represent their interests,” continued Pearson.  “If Garry McCarthy doesn’t like that, well that’s just too bad.  If McCarthy is so interested in influence peddling, he should pop into some of the gin mills ringing the Illinois Capitol and count the ruddy red noses of taxpayer-funded lobbyists for the City of Chicago.”
 
McCarthy’s assertion that the Founders limited arms to smooth bore muskets is demonstrably false as well.
 
McCarthy has previously said that Illinois “does not have strict gun laws” and that stricter laws were needed in order to adequately combat crimes committed by those illegally possessing firearms.
 
It’s a concerning prejudice against law-abiding citizens from an official who has the authority to arrest and give orders to fire at them.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!