i agree with everything you say except letting citizens vote directly... the fact is that 50% of the population is average intelligence or less..and another 10-20% are not really smart enough to "get government".. that leaves 30% that could vote on things in the correct context..and thats why we have parties and preference voting and so on...
direct democracy puts the power with the mob... thats a recipe for disaster.. can you imagine if NASA was building a new shuttle and opened its next design concept up for everyone to vote on?- including ideas that simply dont work?!.... you'd end up with an expensive, non functional p[iece of space junk.... it wouldnt even make it into space...
i'd even go so far as to say that even entertaining the idea of direct democracy implies that you dont know what a democratic government does and how it works.
hahah again, you simply do not understand how the direct dem. system works, you read one line and like most fools you start making entire stories up.
Its kinda like those who argue against a consumption tax, they start yelling and screaming what about the poor? Well its a valid argument, but with a system you simply design it so people who make less then X simply have a card that allows them to buy X amount a year without paying the tax, now I wont go into the numbers and projections here as its obvious there is no way you would grasp it.
Now with direct democracy, you have a formula, just like in regular voting now we do not allow people in jail to vote etc, you have a system whereas certain people but in larger numbers who obviously contribute to the economy can vote, you eliminate the garbage or make their vote count as 1 vs a 2.
MY POINT IS and please calm yourself down before you speak, for every idea you must build a system, a structure, you dont just delete entire ideas because you think like an ape.
THINK and THINK again, imagine if every time someone had a theory they behaved like you, wed be living in caves.
