Author Topic: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux  (Read 3602 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #25 on: February 27, 2013, 10:32:39 AM »

that was politics.....anyone who believed that was out of their minds as well

LOL!!!!  Always an excuse for when the left does something and their own tactics are used against them. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #26 on: February 27, 2013, 10:45:27 AM »
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/27/jon-stewart-razes-robert-gibbs_n_2773242.html

Remember when W's admn got skwered for this type of thing? 


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #27 on: February 27, 2013, 06:26:57 PM »
 :D

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #28 on: February 28, 2013, 10:03:56 AM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #29 on: February 28, 2013, 10:07:40 AM »
Cuomo Announces Plans To Modify Gun Control Law To Exempt Film Industry

To Also Fix Error In Legislation Featuring Cops And High-Capacity Magazines

February 27, 2013 10:01 PM




NEW YORK (CBSNewYork/AP) — Just a month after Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the strictest gun control law in the country, state officials plan to make some exemptions.
 
The law toughened restrictions on military-style rifles and high-capacity semiautomatic handguns, but those restrictions will be changed so those types of weapons can be used on the sets of television shows and movies being shot in New York.
 
“We spend a lot of money in the state bringing movie production here, post production here. So obviously we would want to facilitate that,” Cuomo said.
 
Cuomo said the prop firearms used in films would probably not be classified as an assault weapon.
 
“But people want certainty and there’s no reason not to make a change like that,” the governor added. “Apparently, they have blanks or they have phony magazines or something.”


Cuomo and lawmakers announced on Wednesday that they’ll also fix an error that made its way into the law.
 
The measure passed so quickly that as it reads now, police officers carrying high-capacity magazines could be in violation of the law, Diamond reported.
 
The need for a “clean-up” bill means the fight over the law may not be over after all.
 
An estimated 10,000 opponents of the new restrictions will descend on Albany Thursday as legislators consider additional amendments.
 
The New York State legislature quickly passed the gun control measure in the wake of the Dec. 14 Newtown, Conn. school massacre. Gunman Adam Lanza used a Bushmaster .223 semiautomatic in his rampage that left 20 first graders and six educators dead.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #30 on: February 28, 2013, 10:09:51 AM »
 8)

syntaxmachine

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2687
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2013, 06:12:08 AM »
I presume most who frequent these boards agree with the OP, so a rejoinder to my response is surely going to come at any moment.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2013, 06:16:16 AM »
Afghanistan:
 2001-2007 (Bush) 475 Killed
 2008-2012 (Obama) 1,699 killed (78%)
 2013-Present (Obama) still being killed
 http://icasualties.org/oef/

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #33 on: March 04, 2013, 06:57:33 AM »
Afghanistan:
 2001-2007 (Bush) 475 Killed
 2008-2012 (Obama) 1,699 killed (78%)
 2013-Present (Obama) still being killed
 http://icasualties.org/oef/

Oh Jesus Christ...more presentation of falsehoods....yes more soldiers were killed under Obama...because Obama really pressed the war against the Taliban....after years of us just conceding certain territories to their control, our military, using the surge, routed the Taliban out of certain areas that were always under their control....Every idiot other than you apparently knows that the more you fight, the more casualities you take...simple math...what you are presenting is nothing new

Now if you want, lets also discuss all terrorists that Obama has killed far and above that Bush killed.....Im sure their will be silence

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #34 on: March 04, 2013, 06:58:21 AM »
 ;D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #35 on: March 05, 2013, 12:23:24 PM »
 8)

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #36 on: March 05, 2013, 02:09:22 PM »
Afghanistan:
 2001-2007 (Bush) 475 Killed
 2008-2012 (Obama) 1,699 killed (78%)
 2013-Present (Obama) still being killed
 http://icasualties.org/oef/

Who started these wars again?

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #37 on: March 05, 2013, 10:15:11 PM »
8)

its really weird and paradoxical that you call yourself a patriot yet post stuff like this up above...

up the dosage!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39456
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy Redux
« Reply #38 on: February 24, 2020, 09:49:41 AM »
Weinstein convicted.  Libqueens silent and sullen.