DOJ Memo says BAN & CONFISCATE ALL Guns

[24KT]

DOJ Memo says BAN & CONFISCATE ALL Guns

[avxo]

Well, if Alex Jones says it, it must be true...

[Archer77]

Well, if Alex Jones says it, it must be true...

You aren't implying that mr. Jones might not always have his facts straight? What are you, a commie?

[Soul Crusher]

Well, if Alex Jones says it, it must be true...

uuummmm - the internal DOJ letter is clear on its face. 

[blacken700]

the stupid party will eat this up like chocolate cake

[tonymctones]

Here you go libtards

"It also says that even total elimination of assault weapons would have little overall effect on gun killings because assault weapons account for a limited proportion of those crimes.

The nine-page document says the success of universal background checks would depend in part on "requiring gun registration," and says gun buybacks would not be effective "unless massive and coupled with a ban."

so they admit that an assualt weapons and high cap mag ban wouldnt be effective and say that in order to make them effective it would require a ban which would require those in public hands now be banned.

nothing to see here folks move along, libtards arent trying to ban or take away any guns.

[avxo]

I don't find that "memo" particularly damning - it analyzes an issue and says "in order for X to work Y would have to happen" which is what a good analysis should do. It doesn't mean that Y will - or can happen. But let's assume, arguendo, that they try to implement this memo and "ban & confiscate all guns". How will they do this? They would need either a Constitutional Amendment or a decision from SCOTUS that contradicts a long line of cases culminating in Heller. Both of those options are out of the realm of possibility.

In other words, this ain't happening.

[tonymctones]

I don't find that "memo" particularly damning - it analyzes an issue and says "in order for X to work Y would have to happen" which is what a good analysis should do. It doesn't mean that Y will - or can happen. But let's assume, arguendo, that they try to implement this memo and "ban & confiscate all guns". How will they do this? They would need either a Constitutional Amendment or a decision from SCOTUS that contradicts a long line of cases culminating in Heller. Both of those options are out of the realm of possibility.

In other words, this ain't happening.

I have to agree with the majority of this but this does lend credibility to the anti gun legislation argument as the analysis says that a gun ban/high cap mag ban would not be effective.

You should post here more often AVXO, you seem like a level headed dude with a good understanding of the issues.

[MCWAY]

Here you go libtards

"It also says that even total elimination of assault weapons would have little overall effect on gun killings because assault weapons account for a limited proportion of those crimes.

The nine-page document says the success of universal background checks would depend in part on "requiring gun registration," and says gun buybacks would not be effective "unless massive and coupled with a ban."

so they admit that an assualt weapons and high cap mag ban wouldnt be effective and say that in order to make them effective it would require a ban which would require those in public hands now be banned.

nothing to see here folks move along, libtards arent trying to ban or take away any guns.

........YET!!!!

[24KT]

Well, if Alex Jones says it, it must be true...

There you go again. Forget the messenger, ...listen to the message.
It's the message you need to be paying attention to, ...especially when there's proof attached.

[24KT]

I don't find that "memo" particularly damning - it analyzes an issue and says "in order for X to work Y would have to happen" which is what a good analysis should do. It doesn't mean that Y will - or can happen. But let's assume, arguendo, that they try to implement this memo and "ban & confiscate all guns". How will they do this? They would need either a Constitutional Amendment or a decision from SCOTUS that contradicts a long line of cases culminating in Heller. Both of those options are out of the realm of possibility.

In other words, this ain't happening.

When it comes to getting their way, ...to the powers that be, nothing is outside of the realm of possibility.

Seriously, there are things we do today that years ago would have been considered out of the realm of possibility.

Where was the required Constitutional Amendments that brought in the Patriot Act & the NDAA.

From where I'm sitting, they amended the 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendments right out of there the moment they were signed into law.

The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, ...and heaven knows there have been a lot of shenanigans and hijinks slipped in while people's attentions have been diverted elsewhere.