Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
July 25, 2014, 09:12:59 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Bob Woodward - "The WH threatened me"  (Read 347 times)
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7652


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« on: February 27, 2013, 07:16:09 PM »

http://www.businessinsider.com/bob-woodward-obama-sequester-white-house-reporting-price-politics-2013-2


Unreal
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7652


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2013, 07:21:14 PM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxgTOQEGy30" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxgTOQEGy30</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7652


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2013, 09:32:25 PM »


Obama Admin Ups Attacks on Woodward
The White House via Twitter ^ | 10:52 p.m. EST Wednesday, February 27, 2013 | David Plouffe
Posted on February 27, 2013 11:17:37 PM EST by kristinn

Watching Woodward last 2 days is like imagining my idol Mike Schmidt facing live pitching again. Perfection gained once is rarely repeated.

@DavidPlouffe Strategist. 2008 Obama Campaign Manager. White House Senior Adviser. Author of The Audacity To Win.
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7652


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2013, 07:35:19 AM »

WMAL EXCLUSIVE: Fmr. Clinton Aide Davis Says He Received White House Threat (audio at link)
630 WMAL, Washington, DC ^ | 2/28/13 | WMAL Staff
Posted on February 28, 2013, 9:25:09 AM EST by SilvieWaldorfMD

WASHINGTON -- Bob Woodward isn't the only person who's received threats for airing the Obama administration's dirty laundry. It seems anyone is a potential target of the White House these days - even former senior members of the Clinton administration.

A day after Woodward's claim that a senior White House official had told him he would "regret" writing a column criticizing President Obama's stance on the sequester, Lanny Davis, a longtime close advisor to President Bill Clinton, told WMAL's Mornings on the Mall Thursday he had received similar threats for newspaper columns he had written about Obama in the Washington Times.

Davis told WMAL that his editor, John Solomon, "received a phone call from a senior Obama White House official who didn't like some of my columns, even though I'm a supporter of Obama. I couldn't imagine why this call was made." Davis says the Obama aide told Solomon, "that if he continued to run my columns, he would lose, or his reporters would lose their White House credentials."
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7652


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2013, 08:33:15 AM »

Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

USA Today reporter: I know a few reporters who’ve gotten White House e-mails like Woodward's
Hotair ^ | 02/28/2013 | AllahPundit
Posted on February 28, 2013, 10:20:11 AM EST by SeekAndFind

Noteworthy, although I'm not sure which way it cuts. Younger reporters were tweeting last night that they get angry e-mails from political flacks all the time and that it's no big deal, which is a nifty way to humblebrag about how they've upset Power by speaking Truth while also serving the liberal cause du jour of discrediting Bob Woodward. (Some serve more bravely than others.) Is that what David Jackson means here, that Woodward's blowing routine White House grumpiness out of all proportion? Or that Woodward's right and that veiled White House threats are more common than you’d think?

In a statement, the White House said that “of course no threat was intended. As Mr. Woodward noted, the email from the aide was sent to apologize for voices being raised in their previous conversation. The note suggested that Mr. Woodward would regret the observation he made regarding the sequester because that observation was inaccurate, nothing more. And Mr. Woodward responded to this aide’s email in a friendly manner.”

All we can say is: We know more than a few reporters have received similar e-mails from White House officials. Yelling has also been known to happen.

Tension between presidents, presidential aides, and the people who cover them is inherent and has been around as the government itself.

Just as I’m writing this, Politico’s posted what’s alleged to be the full e-mail exchange between Woodward and Sperling, no doubt courtesy of a leak from the latter’s office. Quote:

From Gene Sperling to Bob Woodward on Feb. 22, 2013

Bob:

I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here.

But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim. The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really. It was assumed by the Rs on the Supercommittee that came right after: it was assumed in the November-December 2012 negotiations. There may have been big disagreements over rates and ratios — but that it was supposed to be replaced by entitlements and revenues of some form is not controversial. (Indeed, the discretionary savings amount from the Boehner-Obama negotiations were locked in in BCA: the sequester was just designed to force all back to table on entitlements and revenues.)

I agree there are more than one side to our first disagreement, but again think this latter issue is diffferent. Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice. Your call obviously.

My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize.

Follow the link for Woodward’s supposed reply, which is also conciliatory and even has him saying “You do not ever have to apologize to me” and “I for one welcome a little heat.” Here’s how Woodward himself quoted the e-mail to Politico in their interview yesterday:

The Obama aide “yelled at me for about a half hour,” Woodward told us in an hour-long interview yesterday around the Georgetown dining room table where so many generations of Washington’s powerful have spilled their secrets.

Digging into one of his famous folders, Woodward said the tirade was followed by a page-long email from the aide, one of the four or five administration officials most closely involved in the fiscal negotiations with the Hill. “I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today,” the official typed. “You’re focusing on a few specific trees that give a very wrong impression of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. … I think you will regret staking out that claim.”

Woodward repeated the last sentence, making clear he saw it as a veiled threat. “ ‘You’ll regret.’ Come on,” he said.

The fact that the “threat” came in the context of an apology seemed unusual even last night; as it is, if the leaked e-mail is accurate, Sperling actually apologized three separate times for getting loud and prefaced the “regret” part with “as a friend.” If he’s threatening him, rather than simply trying to steer him away from a wrong/unhelpful claim, it’s a threat so veiled I can’t see it. But stay tuned; Woodward’s set to appear on Hannity’s show tonight to address this, assuming he doesn’t so so elsewhere earlier in the day.
Report to moderator   Logged
MCWAY
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15750


Getbig!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2013, 11:18:11 AM »

Obama and crew are downplaying the sequester, now that the reality has hit that the GOP (for once) won't cave.

48 hours ago, people were going to get fired; first-responders would be impacted, he couldn't deploy another carrier to the Middle East; people wouldn't have day care for their kids; air traffic controllers would suffer.

You'd think a re-enactment of the ten plagues on Egypt were happening in less than 12 hours.
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7652


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2013, 11:20:23 AM »

Obama and crew are downplaying the sequester, now that the reality has hit that the GOP (for once) won't cave.

48 hours ago, people were going to get fired; first-responders would be impacted, he couldn't deploy another carrier to the Middle East; people wouldn't have day care for their kids; air traffic controllers would suffer.

You'd think a re-enactment of the ten plagues on Egypt were happening in less than 12 hours.

I hope the sequester happens,  O-SHIT owns it 
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7652


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2013, 11:25:32 AM »

http://www.wmal.com/common/page.php?pt=WMAL+EXCLUSIVE%3A+Woodward%27s+Not+Alone+-+Fmr.+Clinton+Aide+Davis+Says+He+Received+White+House+Threat&id=8924&is_corp=0


Lanny Davis saying he got threatened too by Obama's goon squad
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7652


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2013, 11:38:21 AM »

Ron Fournier: Yeah, I Got the Abusive Treatment From the WH
 Big Government ^ | 02/28/2013 | Ace of Spades

Posted on Thursday, February 28, 2013 12:17:00 PM by Rusty0604

As editor-in-chief of National Journal, I received several e-mails and telephone calls from this White House official filled with vulgarity, abusive language, and virtually the same phrase that Woodward called a veiled threat. “You will regret staking out that claim,” The Washington Post reporter was told. Once I moved back to daily reporting this year, the badgering intensified. I wrote Saturday night, asking the official to stop e-mailing me.


(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Report to moderator   Logged
Straw Man
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 24823


one dwells in nirvana


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2013, 10:58:24 AM »

Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

USA Today reporter: I know a few reporters who’ve gotten White House e-mails like Woodward's
Hotair ^ | 02/28/2013 | AllahPundit
Posted on February 28, 2013, 10:20:11 AM EST by SeekAndFind

Noteworthy, although I'm not sure which way it cuts. Younger reporters were tweeting last night that they get angry e-mails from political flacks all the time and that it's no big deal, which is a nifty way to humblebrag about how they've upset Power by speaking Truth while also serving the liberal cause du jour of discrediting Bob Woodward. (Some serve more bravely than others.) Is that what David Jackson means here, that Woodward's blowing routine White House grumpiness out of all proportion? Or that Woodward's right and that veiled White House threats are more common than you’d think?

In a statement, the White House said that “of course no threat was intended. As Mr. Woodward noted, the email from the aide was sent to apologize for voices being raised in their previous conversation. The note suggested that Mr. Woodward would regret the observation he made regarding the sequester because that observation was inaccurate, nothing more. And Mr. Woodward responded to this aide’s email in a friendly manner.”

All we can say is: We know more than a few reporters have received similar e-mails from White House officials. Yelling has also been known to happen.

Tension between presidents, presidential aides, and the people who cover them is inherent and has been around as the government itself.

Just as I’m writing this, Politico’s posted what’s alleged to be the full e-mail exchange between Woodward and Sperling, no doubt courtesy of a leak from the latter’s office. Quote:

From Gene Sperling to Bob Woodward on Feb. 22, 2013

Bob:

I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here.

But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim. The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really. It was assumed by the Rs on the Supercommittee that came right after: it was assumed in the November-December 2012 negotiations. There may have been big disagreements over rates and ratios — but that it was supposed to be replaced by entitlements and revenues of some form is not controversial. (Indeed, the discretionary savings amount from the Boehner-Obama negotiations were locked in in BCA: the sequester was just designed to force all back to table on entitlements and revenues.)

I agree there are more than one side to our first disagreement, but again think this latter issue is diffferent. Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice. Your call obviously.

My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize.

Follow the link for Woodward’s supposed reply, which is also conciliatory and even has him saying “You do not ever have to apologize to me” and “I for one welcome a little heat.” Here’s how Woodward himself quoted the e-mail to Politico in their interview yesterday:

The Obama aide “yelled at me for about a half hour,” Woodward told us in an hour-long interview yesterday around the Georgetown dining room table where so many generations of Washington’s powerful have spilled their secrets.

Digging into one of his famous folders, Woodward said the tirade was followed by a page-long email from the aide, one of the four or five administration officials most closely involved in the fiscal negotiations with the Hill. “I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today,” the official typed. “You’re focusing on a few specific trees that give a very wrong impression of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. … I think you will regret staking out that claim.”

Woodward repeated the last sentence, making clear he saw it as a veiled threat. “ ‘You’ll regret.’ Come on,” he said.

The fact that the “threat” came in the context of an apology seemed unusual even last night; as it is, if the leaked e-mail is accurate, Sperling actually apologized three separate times for getting loud and prefaced the “regret” part with “as a friend.” If he’s threatening him, rather than simply trying to steer him away from a wrong/unhelpful claim, it’s a threat so veiled I can’t see it. But stay tuned; Woodward’s set to appear on Hannity’s show tonight to address this, assuming he doesn’t so so elsewhere earlier in the day.

this email is the "so called" threat

holy shit - Bob Woodward is even more of a pussy than you
Report to moderator   Logged
Straw Man
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 24823


one dwells in nirvana


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 01, 2013, 11:26:39 AM »

Here is how Woodward responded to his friends so called "threat"

Gene, 

You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice. I am listening. I know you lived all this. My partial advantage is that I talked extensively with all involved. I am traveling and will try to reach you after 3 pm today.

Best, Bob

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/exclusive-the-woodward-sperling-emails-revealed-88226.html#ixzz2MJWVSsId
Report to moderator   Logged
Necrosis
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8130


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 01, 2013, 04:12:03 PM »


this guy is a crackpot dude, you can't be serious.
Report to moderator   Logged
Skip8282
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 6362



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 01, 2013, 08:06:50 PM »

Pretty weak for a threat, lol.
Report to moderator   Logged
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 81769


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2013, 01:09:00 AM »

Pretty weak for a threat, lol.

THIS. 
Report to moderator   Logged

24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24240


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2013, 02:45:59 AM »

It's gotta be hell to peak so early in your career.  Roll Eyes I mean, ...how do you top Watergate?
Report to moderator   Logged

w
AbrahamG
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2124

The vagina is my third favorite hole.


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2013, 03:29:23 AM »

Yeah, he has really turned into a joke.  A pseudo journalist at this point.  Bernstein is far more accomplished.  And intelligent for that matter.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!