« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Phil Hill  (Read 13798 times)

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #25 on: March 13, 2013, 10:28:29 AM »
Quote from: HockeyFightFan on March 13, 2013, 10:26:26 AM
Groink needs to get out of the sun.

Groink couldn't dream of having legs a quarter of this size.
Logged
7

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31501
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #26 on: March 13, 2013, 10:42:27 AM »
wiggs nice thread,,,he won a show in jersey to requalify in 87 nationals looking like that  :o..someone mention nimrod king he had a massive chest and upper body,legs were not quite there,but nimrod placed well for a canadian..
Logged

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #27 on: March 13, 2013, 10:49:13 AM »
Quote from: njflex on March 13, 2013, 10:42:27 AM
wiggs nice thread,,,he won a show in jersey to requalify in 87 nationals looking like that  :o..someone mention nimrod king he had a massive chest and upper body,legs were not quite there,but nimrod placed well for a canadian..

i actually think nimrod (he says his name means 'great warrior',lol)  won or placed top three in a few pro shows. the guy was a freak.  bigger than phil hill i believe.
Logged

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #28 on: March 13, 2013, 10:49:46 AM »
Quote from: Wiggs on March 13, 2013, 10:08:43 AM
lol. Are you serious? WTF do we have today then? Even on Heath.

'blocky'   i believe was the term used.
Logged

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31501
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #29 on: March 13, 2013, 11:30:35 AM »
Quote from: hazbin on March 13, 2013, 10:49:13 AM
i actually think nimrod (he says his name means 'great warrior',lol)  won or placed top three in a few pro shows. the guy was a freak.  bigger than phil hill i believe.
UR RIGHT,I THINK HE WON THE NIAGRA FALLS OR PLACED AS U SAID TOP 3....
Logged

the_swami

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1776
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #30 on: March 13, 2013, 06:03:03 PM »
Phil Hill was def a freak in the 80's

thick thick thick, esp his legs

a little narrow but a freak

the 88 Olympia was a travesty- crwod was going crazy that Phil hill didnt make top 10- non stop chanting Phil hill!
Logged

BDsauce

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2660
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #31 on: March 13, 2013, 06:12:20 PM »
Logged

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #32 on: March 13, 2013, 06:28:46 PM »
  word up   hazbin is correct
Logged

the_swami

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1776
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #33 on: March 13, 2013, 06:57:14 PM »
Nimrod king was known for teh chest

very very thick chest

i beleive he got into promoting BB shows?
Logged

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #34 on: March 14, 2013, 12:11:22 AM »
Logged

falco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18327
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #35 on: March 14, 2013, 10:01:59 AM »
The guy was a beast :o!
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #36 on: March 14, 2013, 10:24:45 AM »
If Phil Hill competed today (on what today's Pro's take), he'd beat Phil Heath...
Logged

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31501
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #37 on: March 14, 2013, 10:32:42 AM »
Quote from: Parker on March 14, 2013, 10:24:45 AM
If Phil Hill competed today (on what today's Pro's take), he'd beat Phil Heath...

HE SHOULD...
Logged

doriancutlerman

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #38 on: March 14, 2013, 01:54:27 PM »
Quote from: Wiggs on March 13, 2013, 08:48:13 AM
5'8, 225-230, shredded back in 1987-1988. Huge guy, great physique, little narrow but great guy nonetheless.

Whatever happened to him? Why'd he quit competing? I'm impressed that this physique was built without the massive dosages we see today. Dude even has the vacuum pose he can pull off with a super small waist.



I don't know why he quit.  Maybe one of the Weiders wanted him to blow a horse or something whacked out.  All I know is, narrow clavicles aside, he is the most underrated freak this side of Aaron Baker.  In fact, I say PH kicks Baker's ass.  Giant, around arms, retarded big legs, very dense pecs, a good back ... he had it all.  If you've seen that pic of him horse riding with a friend, his leg development from the side didn't even look human. 

In a lot of respects he reminded me of Big "Betil" Fox, only with wheels and a superb back.
Logged

Da Freak

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2229
  • Get BIG! Or DIE trying!
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #39 on: March 14, 2013, 02:46:41 PM »
crazy thickness. ridiculous forearms and bis!  :o
Logged

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #40 on: March 14, 2013, 03:39:46 PM »
Logged

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #41 on: March 14, 2013, 03:42:35 PM »
 ;D
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #42 on: March 14, 2013, 03:44:44 PM »
Quote from: Wiggs on March 13, 2013, 08:56:44 AM
Holy shit this insane!  Especially considering it was 1987.  Lovely elevator music btw.


If you compare him to Kai and Jay who are the same height, his arms seem bigger, delts are better and his waist seem smaller. Quads, about the same in detail. Back more detailed than Jay's, but both are wider than him.
Logged

FitnessFrenzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28959
  • evolving
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #43 on: March 15, 2013, 04:52:11 AM »
hahaha
Logged

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #44 on: March 15, 2013, 08:15:44 AM »
Logged
7

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31501
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #45 on: March 15, 2013, 08:16:46 AM »
Logged

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28210
  • I ate an entire box of popsicles the day prior
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #46 on: March 15, 2013, 08:28:47 AM »
Yes his waist is much to big.
Logged

abijahmaniaco

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #47 on: March 16, 2013, 01:05:34 AM »


looks like a gorilla. props though.
Logged

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #48 on: March 16, 2013, 02:11:34 AM »
Quote from: Wiggs on March 13, 2013, 10:26:14 AM
What I find interesting is that people train today with these outrageous weights thanks to Ronnie changing that :-X

Yet guys like Phil Hill, Haney, Ray and other trained with what would be considered today "pussy weights" yet have some of the best physiques ever.

In the Battle for the O's i saw, Shawn Ray was one who was training almost the heaviest
Logged

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39916
  • Getbig!
Re: Phil Hill
« Reply #49 on: March 16, 2013, 12:12:56 PM »
hill reminds me of a later day lawrence samuels he was huge for the times and most times actually.
Logged
F
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »