Author Topic: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11  (Read 86556 times)

Radical Plato

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12879
  • Rhetoric is the art of ruling the minds of men.
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #250 on: April 07, 2013, 04:43:33 AM »
V

syntaxmachine

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2687
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #251 on: April 07, 2013, 04:48:59 AM »
People like Ropo are a perfect example of how well the system works, how it makes citizens resistant to question authority and to ridicule those who do.  The reason he gets so emotional and hysterical about 9/11 is because the thought that Governments don't have citizens best interests at heart cause him great anxiety, as it should do in those that have been properly indoctrinated.  To investigate 9/11 and not be suspicious is cause for concern, you don't need to believe it was a conspiracy, but at least acknowledge that all the pieces of the puzzle don't seem to fit together.  

I asked Ropo about the missing 3/4 billion dollars stored under the WTC and he just said it was false.  It was well documented how much money was stored there, and how much money was recovered.  Anything Ropo doesn't like the sound of he just calls it a claim or bullshit.  Ropo is a man who cannot stand the thought that he may be wrong, that everything isn't as black and white as he wants it to be.  His constant name calling of people who ask questions about suspicious events is indication of why Governments feel no resistance when it comes to duping the public, they know there is many people like Ropo who will lap up anything they are told, like the good little boy the Government raised them to be.

If only he'd been fed a steady diet of the Youtube videos you have watched, he would have been a member of the Enlightened Class as well.

Radical Plato

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12879
  • Rhetoric is the art of ruling the minds of men.
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #252 on: April 07, 2013, 04:58:01 AM »
If only he'd been fed a steady diet of the Youtube videos you have watched, he would have been a member of the Enlightened Class as well.
I gather by your comment you don't find anything suspicious about 9/11.  What is strange about Ropo is that he is so angry that people don't believe the official story.  Why would he be so concerned if others find the event suspicious.  Even if you had never heard anything at all about 9/11 conspiracies, just to watch the collapse via video footage, anybody who had ever seen video of a controlled demolition would see the uncanny similarities.  For me, I just believe it is suspicious, I am not saying it is or isn't a conspiracy, but Ropo takes this extreme hard line stance like it is ridiculous to even question the Government.  I would still like a reasonable explanation as to what happened to the billion dollars stored under the WTC.  The non tin hats just ignore the question or outright deny their wasn't any gold or silver there.
V

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5810
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #253 on: April 07, 2013, 07:43:56 AM »
For the final time morons....

The towers did NOT have to fall they only had to be hit for the mission to be successful and for Bush to do exactly what he did.

Pentagon didn't need to be hit either and the Capital building was NOT hit at all.

The fact they fell is irrelevant!

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #254 on: April 07, 2013, 10:52:00 AM »
For the final time morons....

The towers did NOT have to fall they only had to be hit for the mission to be successful and for Bush to do exactly what he did.

Pentagon didn't need to be hit either and the Capital building was NOT hit at all.

The fact they fell is irrelevant!
There was money involved as well fuckstick. The insurance Silverstein collected on a destroyed complex??? Just patching up the towers was not going to be an option. They could have flown over the towers and dumped water on it to control the fires. They have controlled much worse fires in skyscrapers before and after 911.

Money and power. Iraq was about oil and money. Afghanistan is about minerals, naturals gas and money.

And by controlling these zones it gives the Zionists more power to pursue their agendas.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #255 on: April 07, 2013, 10:55:36 AM »
People like Ropo are a perfect example of how well the system works, how it makes citizens resistant to question authority and to ridicule those who do.  The reason he gets so emotional and hysterical about 9/11 is because the thought that Governments don't have citizens best interests at heart cause him great anxiety, as it should do in those that have been properly indoctrinated.  To investigate 9/11 and not be suspicious is cause for concern, you don't need to believe it was a conspiracy, but at least acknowledge that all the pieces of the puzzle don't seem to fit together.  

I asked Ropo about the missing 3/4 billion dollars stored under the WTC and he just said it was false.  It was well documented how much money was stored there, and how much money was recovered.  Anything Ropo doesn't like the sound of he just calls it a claim or bullshit.  Ropo is a man who cannot stand the thought that he may be wrong, that everything isn't as black and white as he wants it to be.  His constant name calling of people who ask questions about suspicious events is indication of why Governments feel no resistance when it comes to duping the public, they know there is many people like Ropo who will lap up anything they are told, like the good little boy the Government raised them to be.
God help us if the NWO plans does include a smaller, 500 million population with the majority of citizens being like Ropo. This could easily become a reality because only 1/14 people would have to be brainwashed like him which I think is very plausible.

He is obviously a very weak character.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #256 on: April 07, 2013, 11:00:42 AM »
yeah i think highjacked planes alone with one crashing somewhere ,or even not, would have been enough.

You don't know that. Nobody could guess something like that. The government will do whatever they want.

Lanza supposedly kills 20 kids and now we hear on TV about how massive numbers of people are being killed by these evil guns. People kill people. Guns don't.

If anything it is government that have killed millions of people in history. The lone gun nut killing 20 people is a drop in the bucket.

Also, you have to ask yourself if the government did it then we are dealing with evil people.For all you know they could get an orgasm out of more destruction so blowing up is extra insurance and they like the mayhem they create because of sadistic desires.

Remember the laughing, dancing Israelis in New York? These are evil creatures - not your mom.

Beefjake

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1238
  • Oh fuck it.
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #257 on: April 07, 2013, 01:44:35 PM »
About not bring able to keep it covered.

The Manhattan project was kept secred and all in all
included more than 100.000 people at least over three different countries.

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #258 on: April 07, 2013, 02:22:47 PM »
You can see demolition squibs all over the place on the towers as they are falling.  This is evidence of explosions I would say.  You do realize that the fires were confined to a small number of floors don't you?  The compounds used were thermite and nano- thermite, not conventional demolition explosives.  The huge dust cloud you see from the collapse is called pyroclastic flow, caused by controlled demolition, which is the only explanation for pulverized concrete.  The buildings were designed specifically to withstand impact from a jet, and designed so that if something catastrophic did happen, then the entire complex wouldn't collapse, but break off.  How do explain the presence of thermite in the rubble?  How do you explain Larry Silverstein saying they went ahead and "pulled" building 7?  He admitted it was a controlled demolition on camera.  Why was that building wired for controlled demolition?  You really need to research the topic a bit more.
a

syntaxmachine

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2687
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #259 on: April 07, 2013, 04:19:58 PM »


I find your lack of faith (in demolition squibs) disturbing.

Seven Copper Coins

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1090
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #260 on: April 07, 2013, 04:33:56 PM »
About not bring able to keep it covered.

The Manhattan project was kept secred and all in all
included more than 100.000 people at least over three different countries.

In 1940. No television, no internet...no every citizen in the country can take a video with their phone and it's on youtube in 5 minutes.

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5810
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #261 on: April 07, 2013, 04:41:06 PM »
In 1940. No television, no internet...no every citizen in the country can take a video with their phone and it's on youtube in 5 minutes.
plus it wasn't kept a secret for very long! If at all if you believe the Russians.

cart@@n

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1246
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #262 on: April 07, 2013, 05:12:24 PM »

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #263 on: April 07, 2013, 05:18:34 PM »
I find your lack of faith (in demolition squibs) disturbing.

 :D  No no, I have a bus load of faith in demolition squibs, I do. I have dated many demolition squibs. My first wife was a demolition squib. I'm just not too sure any demolition squibs were used in those tall buildings that were hit by those exploding airplanes.
a

cart@@n

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1246
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #264 on: April 07, 2013, 05:32:09 PM »
I think every american citizen should watch this documentary.

After that, if somebody choose to blindly believe the official version of the facts, it's their right.

syntaxmachine

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2687
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #265 on: April 07, 2013, 05:32:47 PM »
You can see demolition squibs all over the place on the towers as they are falling.  This is evidence of explosions I would say.  You do realize that the fires were confined to a small number of floors don't you?  The compounds used were thermite and nano- thermite, not conventional demolition explosives.  The huge dust cloud you see from the collapse is called pyroclastic flow, caused by controlled demolition, which is the only explanation for pulverized concrete.  The buildings were designed specifically to withstand impact from a jet, and designed so that if something catastrophic did happen, then the entire complex wouldn't collapse, but break off.  How do explain the presence of thermite in the rubble?  How do you explain Larry Silverstein saying they went ahead and "pulled" building 7?  He admitted it was a controlled demolition on camera.  Why was that building wired for controlled demolition?  You really need to research the topic a bit more.

I'd like to better understand the way you think. Assuming your theory of...uh...demotion squibs is in fact correct, what are you going to do about it?

Kahn.N.Singh

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
  • Die Weltgeschichte ist das Weltgericht
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #266 on: April 07, 2013, 06:27:01 PM »
Like Tommy and Syntax, I, too, am skeptical that demolition squids had a hand or eight in bringing down the towers. For one thing, duration time and project scale has to be questioned. Demolition squids cannot live out of water for more than a few minutes. This has important ramifications on the size of the projects the demolition team accepts. A slight miscalculation in the time it takes to set the explosives and retreat to the safety tank could result in a demolition team member being plated as that evening's calamari fra diavolo special at the Pearl Oyster Bar.

So, yeah, demolition squids contribute nothing, pari passu, to epistemic warrants for the empirical belief of how the towers were brought down. Moreover, demolition squids are cheerful cephalopods and promoters of world peace. Their union motto is: i frangere ut restituere (I break only to restore).

Seven Copper Coins

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1090
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #267 on: April 07, 2013, 06:58:43 PM »
I gather by your comment you don't find anything suspicious about 9/11.  What is strange about Ropo is that he is so angry that people don't believe the official story.  Why would he be so concerned if others find the event suspicious.  Even if you had never heard anything at all about 9/11 conspiracies, just to watch the collapse via video footage, anybody who had ever seen video of a controlled demolition would see the uncanny similarities.  For me, I just believe it is suspicious, I am not saying it is or isn't a conspiracy, but Ropo takes this extreme hard line stance like it is ridiculous to even question the Government.  I would still like a reasonable explanation as to what happened to the billion dollars stored under the WTC.  The non tin hats just ignore the question or outright deny their wasn't any gold or silver there.

The only similarities are that gravity works.

Voice of Doom

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3644
  • Everything is under control.
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #268 on: April 07, 2013, 07:03:26 PM »
Inside job.

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #269 on: April 07, 2013, 07:09:17 PM »
Like Tommy and Syntax, I, too, am skeptical that demolition squids had a hand or eight in bringing down the towers. For one thing, duration time and project scale has to be questioned. Demolition squids cannot live out of water for more than a few minutes. This has important ramifications on the size of the projects the demolition team accepts. A slight miscalculation in the time it takes to set the explosives and retreat to the safety tank could result in a demolition team member being plated as that evening's calamari fra diavolo special at the Pearl Oyster Bar.

So, yeah, demolition squids contribute nothing, pari passu, to epistemic warrants for the empirical belief of how the towers were brought down. Moreover, demolition squids are cheerful cephalopods and promoters of world peace. Their union motto is: i frangere ut restituere (I break only to restore).

;D ;D ;D
Proof! Solid scientific proof.
a

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #270 on: April 07, 2013, 07:15:02 PM »
ok, this one always had me asking myself why didnt the govt ever release more footage, there were more than enough cameras there,its the pentagon afteral.


They confiscated all the footage from the gas stations.

I know it is hard for people to accept but the reality is there are just too many open questions on 911 and everything that followed afterwards.

If you decide to believe everything you are told that's your right and fine by me. I find it really easy to not believe all the BS we have been told. They have lied too many times and we know government officials are bought and paid for whores. Follow the money trail.

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #271 on: April 07, 2013, 09:13:21 PM »
For the final time morons....

The towers did NOT have to fall they only had to be hit for the mission to be successful and for Bush to do exactly what he did.

Pentagon didn't need to be hit either and the Capital building was NOT hit at all.

The fact they fell is irrelevant!

During the first Iraq War in early 90's, it wasn't the media that came up with the name Shock and Awe...It was the American government. A plane flying into a building wouldn't scare millions of people around the globe like bringing down 3 massive buildings and killing thousands of people would...Nobody in the Hierarchy comes up with a plan that's one dimensional. Every plan is always multi layered.

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #272 on: April 07, 2013, 09:28:54 PM »
There were 85 surveillance cameras on the Pentagon, and aimed at the Pentagon from neighboring Hotels, Gas Stations, etc...

All footage was confiscated or "lost" immediately following the attack. These four frames were later released.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #273 on: April 07, 2013, 10:02:07 PM »
There were 85 surveillance cameras on the Pentagon, and aimed at the Pentagon from neighboring Hotels, Gas Stations, etc...

All footage was confiscated or "lost" immediately following the attack. These four frames were later released.
Exactly! They thought they were sneaky by only releasing 4 frames but even those 4 frames make it clear there was no airliner crashing into the building.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11
« Reply #274 on: April 07, 2013, 10:06:06 PM »
List the names?  Are you fucking retarded?  How would anyone know their names?   :D
Then how can you claim 100s saw the plane go into the Pentagon? Have you interviewed them? Seeing a plane fly overhead and seeing it hit the building are two separate things.