LOL so homosexuality being at either end of the bell curve at most 5% according to this video is normal to you?
hahahah so first you assert that you cant graph homosexuality on a bell curve and then when proven to be wrong you fall back to your next idiotic entrenched point?
brilliant
Retardo, the entire point of the video is that the idea of "normal sexual orientation" is difficult to define. So,
to support your claim that liberals should just accept that homosexuality isn't normal you post a video featuring a lesbian from a lib/les organization making a scientific case that there isn't a "normal"
sexual orientation? Typical you.
But, let's put that aside. You made the claim that gay is more than two standard deviations from the mean. So, do you understand that when you make that claim, it means that the mean becomes SMALLER? If we're going to go by the link you posted, gay men and women make up about 10% of the population. If
we're going to go by your claim, men and women who are not straight make up AT LEAST another 20%. So, already, that's at least 30% of the population that isn't heterosexual.
However, one of the points of the video that YOU posted to support your argument is that these numbers drastically change when your questions become more specific. So. the mean number becomes even SMALLER.
Finally- and this is probably too complicated a concept for you- but the reason the bell graph was set up that way was specifically to make her point. The center stat said "heterosexual" while one end said "gay" and the other said "lesbian"? If gay men and lesbians are distinct, why aren't straight men and women. Because the author of the chart is trying to make a point about sexuality! She'd never chart that data that way for a an actual scientific paper. It would make no sense.
So, basically, dummy, you don't know what you're talking about.
