Arnold vs Phil

[quadzilla456]

Interesting comparison. Arnold was the man!

[delon]

Bit harsh on phil as arnold's forearm is angled a lot more to the camera making it appear bigger. Nonetheless arnie's guns were a big hit with the ladies back in the day

[deviant]

In pictures like that it really highlights the suspicious shoulder 'development' of todays professionals....Arnold's delts look like all his other muscles in that pic (hard, separated, striated)....whereas Phil's shoulders look smooth with no separation between the three deltoid heads.

I think it's safe to say that more current pros are doing site enhancement than not.

Arnold's body looks strong, Phil looks like a puffy cartoon.

This picture effectively busts Phil for oil use in his shoulders....what a great Mr-O....what a prick.

[Papper]

Please don't disgrace Arnold like this. This is more upsetting than the "women love to be raped" thread. Arnold pics should be kept very separate from modern blowupdolls with guts.

[SomeKindofMonster]

No doubt Phil would beat Arnold but Arnold was from a different era
and was way ahead of his time. People mainly remember the 1975 Arnold
and 1980 Arnold but the 73-74 versions were in a different league than those
versions.

[BILL ANVIL]

In pictures like that it really highlights the suspicious shoulder 'development' of todays professionals....Arnold's delts look like all his other muscles in that pic (hard, separated, striated)....whereas Phil's shoulders look smooth with no separation between the three deltoid heads.

I think it's safe to say that more current pros are doing site enhancement than not.

Arnold's body looks strong, Phil looks like a puffy cartoon.

This picture effectively busts Phil for oil use in his shoulders....what a great Mr-O....what a prick.

boom

[Mr Nobody]

If back in the day both were on stage Arnold would wax him, and make a joke later.

[hardgainerj]

No doubt Phil would beat Arnold but Arnold was from a different era
and was way ahead of his time. People mainly remember the 1975 Arnold
and 1980 Arnold but the 73-74 versions were in a different league than those
versions.

i dont think so yeah i said it sure phil has thicker legs but everyone knows one gives up seperation

[quadzilla456]

i dont think so yeah i said it sure phil has thicker legs but everyone knows one gives up seperation

Agreed. Arnold had great separation in his legs - from the front. From the side he lacked the line separating the hamstrings from the quads. And from the rear his legs were also smooth compared to today's guys. Just a little mass on his legs and separation from the rear would have made him unbeatable even today.

[anabolichalo]

philips arm is definitely more muscular than arnolds

[quadzilla456]

[anabolichalo]

[jude2]

Most would prefer to have Arnolds look than Phils.

[anabolichalo]

Most would prefer to have Arnolds look than Phils.

racist

[GraniteCityDon]

I had read years ago Gunter supposedly sported 23's, which by clear comparison there is utter BS. Ronnies arms there were likely legit 23+ and shredded from every angle, never see the likes of them again in my lifetime IMO. I also believe that, despite todays obvious improvements in juice Arnolds arms were better than Heaths. Put them on Arnolds 70's stack and its not even close, Heath would resemble Samir on a good day.

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[Mr Nobody]

There you go ND has got the scanner out, again Arnold would wax him if conditions were the same.

[arce1988]

  Phil arms seem to be a new breed     like those blue cows

[arce1988]

[hipolito mejia]

In pictures like that it really highlights the suspicious shoulder 'development' of todays professionals....Arnold's delts look like all his other muscles in that pic (hard, separated, striated)....whereas Phil's shoulders look smooth with no separation between the three deltoid heads.

I think it's safe to say that more current pros are doing site enhancement than not.

Arnold's body looks strong, Phil looks like a puffy cartoon.

This picture effectively busts Phil for oil use in his shoulders....what a great Mr-O....what a prick.

But then again, Arnold didn't train shoulders as much as Phil has....  It all comes down to the modern drugs...  that gives that puffy look.

[doriancutlerman]

In pictures like that it really highlights the suspicious shoulder 'development' of todays professionals....Arnold's delts look like all his other muscles in that pic (hard, separated, striated)....whereas Phil's shoulders look smooth with no separation between the three deltoid heads.

I think it's safe to say that more current pros are doing site enhancement than not.

Arnold's body looks strong, Phil looks like a puffy cartoon.

This picture effectively busts Phil for oil use in his shoulders....what a great Mr-O....what a prick.

All good points, though in fairness to Heath, I will say this:  Phil is stronger than Arnold.  Didn't he rep 225 like 50 times at that stupid Weider v. Muscletech bench challenge?  Granted, a vast majority of those reps were from the chest to the halfway-up point.  But that was also some years ago and he's grown since then.  I don't know about his training or that ridiculous FST7XYZ shit, but he is legitimately strong.

[mesmorph78]

ronnie had the greatest arms ever

[doriancutlerman]

ronnie had the greatest arms ever

Maybe not ever, but he's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay up there on the "best arms" list, no doubt.

[anabolichalo]

Maybe not ever, but he's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay up there on the "best arms" list, no doubt.

who else if not him

[mesmorph78]

Maybe not ever, but he's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay up there on the "best arms" list, no doubt.

at his peak greatest arms ever ...