Author Topic: Recovery for the 7 Percent  (Read 1836 times)

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Recovery for the 7 Percent
« on: April 29, 2013, 02:32:13 PM »
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Recovery-for-the-7-Percent-by-Paul-Craig-Roberts-130428-849.html





"From the end of the recession in 2009 through 2011 (the last year for which Census Bureau wealth data are available), the 8 million households in the U.S. with a net worth above $836,033 saw their aggregate wealth rise by an estimated $5.6 trillion, while the 111 million households with a net worth at or below that level saw their aggregate wealth decline by an estimated $600 billion." Pew Research, "An Uneven Recovery," by Richard Fry and Paul Taylor.

Since the recession was officially declared to be over in June 2009, I have assured readers that there has been no recovery. Gerald Celente, John Williams (shadowstats.com), and no doubt others have also made it clear that the alleged recovery is an artifact of an understated inflation rate that produces an image of real economic growth.

Now comes the Pew Research Center with its conclusion that the recession ended only for the top 7 percent of households that have substantial holdings of stocks and bonds. The other 93% of the American population is still in recession.

The Pew report attributes the recovery for the affluent to the rise in the stock and bond markets, but does not say what caused these markets to rise.

The stock market's recovery does not reflect rising consumer purchasing power and retail sales. The labor force is shrinking, not growing. Job growth lags population growth, and the few jobs that are created are primarily dead-end jobs in lowly paid domestic services. Retail sales adjusted for inflation and real median household income have been bottom bouncing since 2009.

To the extent that there is profit growth in US corporations, it comes from labor cost savings from offshoring US jobs and from bringing in foreign workers on work visas. By lowering labor costs, corporations boost profits and thereby capital gains for those 7 percent who have large holdings of financial assets. Those in the 93 percent who are displaced by foreign workers experience income reductions. This transfer of the incomes of the 93 percent to the 7 percent via jobs offshoring and work visas is the reason for the stark rise in US income inequality.

Another source of the stock market's rise is the Federal Reserve's policy of quantitative easing, that is, the printing of $1,000 billion dollars annually with which to support the too-big-to-fail banks' balance sheets and to finance the federal budget deficit. The cash that the Fed is pouring into the banks is not finding its way into business and consumer loans, but the money is available for the banks to speculate in derivatives and stock market futures. Thus, the Fed's policy, which is directed at keeping afloat a few oversized banks, also benefits the 7 percent by driving up the value of their stock portfolios.

The reason bond prices are so high that real interest rates are negative is that the Fed is purchasing $1,000 billion of mortgage-backed "securities" and US Treasury debt annually. The lower the Fed forces interest rates, the higher go bond prices. If you are among the 7 percent, the Fed has produced capital gains for your bond portfolio. But if you are a saver among the 93 percent, you are losing purchasing power because the interest you receive is less than the rate of inflation.

The Pew report puts it this way: Since the "recovery" that began in June 2009, wealthy households experienced a 28 percent rise in their net worth, while everyone else lost 4 percent of their assets.

Is this the profile of a democracy in which government serves the public interest, or is it the profile of a financial aristocracy that uses government to grind the population under foot?

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

Dr. Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration. He was associate editor and columnist with the Wall Street Journal, columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service. He is a contributing editor to Gerald Celente's Trends Journal. He has had numerous university appointments. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is available here:

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2013, 02:34:30 PM »
  Great thread.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2013, 02:35:40 PM »
I predict True Anus or some other douche bag will sign in soon to claim that pointing this out equates to complaining and trying to blame "others for their failures". Ok, I am willing to bet most here are part of the 93%.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2013, 02:37:04 PM »
  Great thread.
Thanks. Paul Craig Roberts has a way of breaking things down in layman's terms. A great American!

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2013, 02:56:38 PM »
I predict True Anus or some other douche bag will sign in soon to claim that pointing this out equates to complaining and trying to blame "others for their failures". Ok, I am willing to bet most here are part of the 93%.

I'm part of the 93%, and my net worth has steadily gone up over the last 5 years.  This article lies.   8)

Psychopath

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3683
  • TEAM DIME PIECE TRANNY
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2013, 03:01:47 PM »
I never understood how workers in a factory get minimum wage or slightly above, while the company nets millions in profit each fucking quarter. Not to mention how supervisors and managers get paid a fuck load for basically nothing.

Dumb, desperate immigrants are willing to suck dick and eat your shit for minimum wage, and if they could work for less, they would. The social engineers know this, and they don't give a flying fuck about their authentic citizens. The white race is being sold down the toilet, very sad.


Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36438
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2013, 03:04:04 PM »
it was on abc news

the wealthiest got wealthier

and the middle class got poorer over obamas term

people still rock those obama bumper stickers hardcore though
A

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2013, 05:38:39 PM »
it was on abc news

the wealthiest got wealthier

and the middle class got poorer over obamas term

people still rock those obama bumper stickers hardcore though

I blame Bohama!   :D

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2013, 05:56:04 PM »

syntaxmachine

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2687
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2013, 01:49:15 AM »
Absent extreme redistributive policies, how can there not be disparities given that the 7% have the wealth to invest and tend to do as such to generate even more? Even if disparity-reducing measures are put in place (policies that increase wages and home values for most Americans, plus less corporate welfare) and are successful, it seems there will always be a disparity in wealth creation and that a big part of the difference in this latest 'recovery' is simply due to this fact.

This isn't to say there aren't any serious problems outlined in the OP, however.

Conker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3189
  • looks like you went for the overcooked potato look
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2013, 01:54:20 AM »
And what % of all the tax are the top 7% paying? i would guess they are still subsidising the sh@t out of the other 93%...

Bad Boy Dazza

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3372
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2013, 01:56:24 AM »
I predict True Anus or some other douche bag will sign in soon to claim that pointing this out equates to complaining and trying to blame "others for their failures". Ok, I am willing to bet most here are part of the 93%.

Fuck I am sick of that little government sycophant.

Bad Boy Dazza

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3372
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2013, 01:57:56 AM »
it was on abc news

the wealthiest got wealthier

and the middle class got poorer over obamas term

people still rock those obama bumper stickers hardcore though

It's official, Obama followers are either stupid, have the morals of a maggot, or are being paid by him.

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2013, 07:23:21 AM »
All the more reason to train hard and go pro.

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48807
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Recovery for the 7 Percent
« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2013, 07:35:13 AM »
And the wealthy will have you believe that with just a little hard work, and some elbow grease, we can all become billionaires  ::) ::)

There is obviously definitely something to be said for hard work and earning your way and succeeding. But the idea that we can all be as rich as bill gates if we just work a little harder, get up a little earlier, is so laughable. How can anyone fall for such nonsense? Of course there is going to be a huge disparity, and I bet little has to do with hard work, as many people are hard worker, and are not wealthy.
X