Author Topic: Integrity  (Read 36884 times)

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Integrity
« Reply #175 on: October 22, 2014, 03:40:43 AM »
Like the article I posted says:  "The website goes on to explain that information shared with Obamacare cannot be shared with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). It does not explicitly warn that illegal aliens are ineligible."

So no, they are not ensuring that the applicants are not illegal aliens. 


That's right. Though it's implied, it is not explicitly stated that illegal aliens will be ineligible.  Glad to see you're reading it correctly now.

Not sure how you got "This is an "explicit declaration" that citizenship is NOT required." as you first did.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #176 on: November 10, 2014, 01:27:12 PM »
Quote
http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/09/obamacare-architect-lack-of-transparency-was-key-because-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-would-have-killed-obamacare


Obama needs to be tried for treason and sent BACK to Africa where he came from and belongs and will fit in better. 




Obamacare Architect: Lack of Transparency Was Key Because ‘Stupidity Of The American Voter’ Would Have Killed Obamacare
11/09/2014
Patrick Howley is an investigative reporter for The Daily Caller.

Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber said that lack of transparency was a major part of getting Obamacare passed because “the stupidity of the American voter” would have killed the law if more people knew what was in it.

Gruber, the MIT professor who served as a technical consultant to the Obama administration during Obamacare’s design, also made clear during a panel quietly captured on video that the individual mandate, which was only upheld by the Supreme Court because it was a tax, was not actually a tax.

“This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. Okay, so it’s written to do that.  In terms of risk rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in – you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed… Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really really critical for the thing to pass… Look, I wish Mark was right that we could make it all transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not.”

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #177 on: November 13, 2014, 09:51:44 AM »
How can you liberals tolerate this lack of integrity? 


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #178 on: November 13, 2014, 10:59:47 AM »
Pelosi cited ObamaCare architect in push for law – now claims she hasn’t heard of him
Published November 13, 2014
FoxNews.com

Nancy Pelosi claimed Thursday she didn’t know who ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber is, after several tapes surfaced showing him gloating about how the law was written to take advantage of the stupidity of the American voter.

Problem is, Gruber’s analysis of the law was cited extensively by her office back in 2009.

Pelosi, the House Democratic leader, tried to downplay Gruber’s role during a press conference on Thursday.

She claimed she doesn’t know who he is, and that he didn’t help write the law. “Let’s put him aside,” she said.

However, Gruber was involved in the process – as his newly surfaced remarks make clear – and his analysis indeed was cited by Pelosi’s office when she was House speaker in late 2009.

At the time, her office put out a “health insurance reform mythbuster” press release pointing to the work of “noted MIT health care economist Jonathan Gruber” in examining the House bill’s impact on premiums. They noted that Gruber found it “would result in lower premiums than under current law for the millions of Americans using the newly-established Health Insurance Exchange.”

Pelosi also mentioned Gruber during a press conference at the time.

When the press release was brought to Pelosi’s office’s attention on Thursday, aides indicated she does not know him – as she does not know everyone they have cited on their website.

Democrats have been putting some distance between themselves and Gruber after a series of recordings – mostly from 2012 and 2013 – have surfaced showing him bad-mouthing American voters.

The latest shows him speaking at the University of Rhode Island in 2012 about the law’s so-called "Cadillac tax.” The “Cadillac tax” mandates that insurance companies be taxed rather than policy holders. He said that taxing individuals would have been “politically impossible,” but taxing the companies worked because Americans didn't understand the difference.

“So basically it's the same thing,” he said. “We just tax the insurance companies, they pass on higher prices that offsets the tax break we get, it ends up being the same thing. It's a very clever, you know, basic exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter.”

The new video follows another showing him speaking on a similar topic at an October 2013 event at Washington University in St. Louis. Referring to the "Cadillac tax,” he said: "They proposed it and that passed, because the American people are too stupid to understand the difference." He also has said a lack of transparency helped the law pass.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, traveling with President Obama in Burma, said he disagrees with Gruber's comments.

Earnest claimed the bill was written in a transparent way and that it's Republicans who aren't transparent about how they would replace it.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/13/pelosi-cited-obamacare-architect-in-push-for-law-now-claims-hasnt-heard-him/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #179 on: November 14, 2014, 09:41:52 AM »
She doesn't know who Gruber is??  O Rly? 


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39387
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Integrity
« Reply #180 on: November 14, 2014, 09:47:05 AM »
She doesn't know who Gruber is??  O Rly? 



Straw voted for her many times

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #181 on: November 18, 2014, 11:49:04 AM »
That Time Gruber Said An Obama Campaign Promise Was Not Credible [VIDEO]
11/17/2014
Chuck Ross

Embattled MIT economist Jonathan Gruber once disagreed with a bold claim made repeatedly by then-Sen. Barack Obama on the 2008 presidential campaign trail that the average American family would save $2,500 on their premiums per year under his health-care plan.

“We’ll work to lower your premiums by up to $2,500 per family per year,” Obama told an audience on Sept. 6, 2008. He made a similar claim at least 18 more times stump speeches during the campaign.

But that was news at the time to Gruber, who later advised the Obama administration on the creation of Obamacare and is now at the center of a firestorm for candid remarks he made about how the administration duped the American public in order to get the health law passed.

“I know zero credible evidence to support that conclusion,” Gruber told the non-partisan FactCheck.org in Feb. 2008 about proposals offered by Obama and his Democratic challenger at the time, Hillary Clinton.

. . .

http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/17/that-time-gruber-said-an-obama-campaign-promise-was-not-credible-video/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #182 on: November 19, 2014, 11:40:19 AM »

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #183 on: November 20, 2014, 12:45:29 PM »
I'm sure it was an innocent mistake.

Oops! Administration Says It Erroneously Inflated Obamacare Enrollment Numbers
AP Posted: 11/20/2014

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration says it's been reporting too high a figure for health law sign-ups because of a counting mistake.

It's another embarrassment after video surfaced recently of a former adviser suggesting that deception was used to pass President Barack Obama's signature law.


Administration spokesman Aaron Albright said Thursday the correct number as of Oct. 15 is about 6.7 million people, or roughly 400,000 fewer than previously reported.

Albright said the mistake involved double-counting people who had separate dental coverage in addition to a medical plan.

Foes of the health law say it's no innocent mistake, and that the numbers were padded. Republicans leading the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee say their staff uncovered the discrepancies.

The over count was first reported by Bloomberg.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/20/obamacare-signups-dental-plans_n_6193808.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #184 on: December 09, 2014, 11:31:19 AM »

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #186 on: January 21, 2015, 08:40:37 AM »
FACT CHECK: Obama claims credit for an incomplete recovery
Published January 20, 2015
Associated Press

WASHINGTON –  The U.S. may not have "risen from recession" quite as rousingly as President Barack Obama suggested in his State of the Union speech Tuesday night. Seven years after that severe downturn began, household income hasn't recovered and healthy job growth is complicated by the poor quality, and pay, of many of those jobs.

It's always problematic when a president takes credit for an improving economy, just as it is when he's blamed for things going bad. A leader can only do so much, for better or worse, and there are two sides to every economy. But after an election in which Obama largely held off on chest-beating, he claimed credit in bold terms for what is going right.

Also in his speech, Obama skimmed over the cost to taxpayers of free community college tuition and invited closer scrutiny with his claims about U.S. support for Syrian moderates and about his record of public-lands preservation.

A look at some of his claims, and the facts and the political climate behind them, as well as a glance at the Republican response:

OBAMA:

--"At this moment - with a growing economy, shrinking deficits, bustling industry and booming energy production - we have risen from recession freer to write our own future than any other nation on Earth."

THE FACTS: By many measures, the economy is still recovering from the deep scars left by the Great Recession.

Job growth has been healthy, but fueled in part by lower-paying jobs in areas such as retail and restaurants, which have replaced many higher-paying positions in manufacturing and construction. Part-time jobs also remain elevated: There are still 1.7 million fewer workers with full-time jobs than when the recession began in December 2007.

And the faster hiring hasn't pushed up wages much. They have been growing at a tepid pace of about 2 percent a year since the recession ended 5 1/2 years ago. That's barely ahead of inflation and below the annual pace of about 3.5 percent to 4 percent that is typical of a fully healthy economy.

That has left the income of the typical household below its pre-recession level. Inflation-adjusted median household income reached $53,880 in November 2014, according to an analysis of government data by Sentier Research. That is about 4 percent higher than when it bottomed out in 2011. But it is still 4.5 percent lower than the $56,447 median income in December 2007, the month the recession began.

Booming energy production is indeed a reality, but that's a phenomenon many years in the making, with the development of cost-effective extraction from fracking and other means playing into the rise of the U.S. as an energy production giant.

------

OBAMA:  "I am sending this Congress a bold new plan to lower the cost of community college -- to zero."

THE FACTS: Zero for qualifying students; an estimated $60 billion over 10 years to the treasury.

Obama confronts a Republican-controlled Congress that can be expected to be wary of a new program costing that much. Moreover, the proposal requires states to contribute about a quarter of the money, and getting them to go along is bound to be tough. Many states refused to expand Medicaid under the health care law, for example, even though Washington is picking up the entire cost in the first years.

On the other hand, community college is an issue close to home for state government, perhaps more appealing than partnering with Washington on the health law, so the idea could have a fighting chance if it can get through Congress. Educators are divided on its merits, with some worrying that aid for a community college education could divert students and scholarships away from four-year schools.

------

OBAMA: "We've set aside more public lands and waters than any administration in history."

THE FACTS: Waters is the key word here. Before expanding the Pacific Remote Islands National Monument last year from almost 87,000 square miles to more than 490,000 square miles, Obama had protected far fewer acres than his four predecessors, including President George W. Bush.

Expansion of the massive Pacific islands monument puts Obama on top. It's nearly all water, however, and the move has limited practical implications. While it bans commercial fishing, deep-sea mining and other extraction of underwater resources, little fishing or drilling occur in the mid-ocean region now.

------

OBAMA: "Thanks to a growing economy, the recovery is touching more and more lives. Wages are finally starting to rise again.áWe know that more small-business owners plan to raise their employees' pay than at any time since 2007."

THE FACTS: A survey of small businesses by the National Federation of Independent Business does show that a rising proportion plans to raise wages. But plans to raise pay aren't the same as actually raising them.

Average hourly earnings rose just 1.7 percent in December from 12 months earlier, according to the Labor Department. That's about half the rate that is typical of a healthy economy and actually lower than the previous month. Economists generally expect wage gains to accelerate this year, as unemployment continues to fall and businesses are forced to offer higher pay to attract workers. But there is scant evidence that it is happening yet.

------

OBAMA: "In Iraq and Syria, American leadership? -- ?including our military power? -- ?is stopping ISIL's advance. Instead of getting dragged into another ground war in the Middle East, we are leading a broad coalition, including Arab nations, to degrade and ultimately destroy this terrorist group. We're also supporting a moderate opposition in Syria that can help us in this effort."

THE FACTS: The U.S. also has been slow to set up long-promised training for the moderate Syrian opposition, and has yet to begin the actual vetting of the rebels. Also, despite persistent pleas from the rebels, the U.S. hasn't sent the more lethal weapons they want. U.S. officials have expressed concerns that the weapons could end up in the hands of insurgents.

Military leaders, however, agree that coalition airstrikes and the military effort in Syria and Iraq have stopped the momentum of the Islamic State group, or ISIL, made it hard for the insurgents to communicate and travel, and hurt their oil revenues.

------

SEN. JONI ERNST: The freshman from Iowa listed Obama's health care law among his "failed policies" and added, "We see the hurt caused by canceled health care plans and higher monthly insurance bills."

THE FACTS: The jury is still out on the law Republicans call "Obamacare."

The number of uninsured people is down by at least 10 million. A large ongoing Gallup survey documented a steady drop in the nation's uninsured rate since the law's big coverage expansion began last year.

The law's record on affordability is mixed. The share of Americans forgoing needed medical care because of cost is down significantly, according to a Commonwealth Fund survey, and fewer are struggling to pay medical bills. Yet many insured people with modest incomes still have problems with high out-of-pocket costs.

As for harm caused by lost insurance, many in Ernst's party are intent on repealing the law, which would probably mean even more lost coverage, because many of the estimated 10 million uninsured people who have gained coverage through the Affordable Care Act would no longer be able to afford their premiums.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/20/fact-check-obama-claims-credit-for-incomplete-recovery/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #187 on: January 21, 2015, 08:55:12 AM »
Quote
He fucked the middle class along time ago, but........


Tonight, in his State of the Union address, President Obama will propose a series of tax increases on the American people. One of these tax increases is indisputably an income tax hike on middle class families with children.

Under Obama’s plan, earnings in “Section 529” (named for its location in the Internal Revenue Code) college savings plans will face full income taxation upon withdrawal.

Under current law, earnings growth in 529 plans is tax-free if account distributions are used to pay for college tuition and fees. The Obama plan will tax earnings in these accounts even if they are used to pay for college tuition and fees.

These accounts are commonly used by middle class families. There are about 12 million 529 accounts open today, and they have an average account balance of approximately $21,000. Most 529 plans permit monthly contributions as low as $25 per month.

This middle class income tax increase is a clear violation of President Obama's “firm pledge” against “any form of tax increase” on any family making less than $250,000. This promise to the American people is documented below:

Speaking in Dover, New Hampshire on Sept. 12, 2008, candidate Obama said:

“I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.” [Video]

During a nationally televised Vice-Presidential debate in St. Louis on Oct. 3, 2008, candidate Joe Biden said:

“No one making less than $250,000 under Barack Obama’s plan will see one single penny of their tax raised whether it’s their capital gains tax, their income tax, investment tax, any tax.” [Transcript]

In an address to a joint session of Congress on Feb. 24, 2009, President Obama restated the promise in forceful terms:

“If your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime.” [Transcript] [Video]

"Rather than raise taxes on middle class families trying to save for their children’s education, Obama should abolish the seven tax increases in Obamacare that directly hit middle-income Americans,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform.

https://www.atr.org/obama-tax-hike-college-savings-plans-breaks-middle-class-tax-pledge

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #188 on: January 27, 2015, 08:12:46 AM »
As Senator, Obama Voted to Make 529 College Savings Plans Permanent
Posted by John Kartch, Ryan Ellis on Monday, January 26th, 2015

On August 3, 2006, then-Senator Barack Obama voted to make the current tax treatment of 529 college savings plans permanent.

President Obama’s recently proposed tax plan, however, reverses this vote on 529 plans.

The vote on H.R. 4 — the Pension Protection Act of 2006 — took place in the second session of the 109th Congress, vote #230.

H.R. 4 made permanent the 529 plan expansion in the otherwise temporary 2001 Bush tax cut package (the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 — EGTRRA). The vote for H.R. 4 enshrined into permanent law the current tax-free growth of these college savings plans if used for tuition and fees. The 529 provision was in Section 1304 of the legislation.

The Obama administration has now proposed raising taxes on 529 plans, reversing the vote Senator Obama took in 2006. The administration now criticizes 529 plans as “upside down,” and “ineffective."

http://www.atr.org/senator-obama-voted-make-529-college-savings-plans-permanent#ixzz3Q2TDnUmZ

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #189 on: February 05, 2015, 11:42:39 AM »
Quote
Free Republic
Browse · Search      News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Brian Williams faces fierce mockery after recanting Iraq war story
Washington post ^ | 2/4/2015 | By Dan Lamothe
Posted on February 5, 2015 at 6:46:29 AM EST by tobyhill

NBC News anchor Brian Williams faced swift, and often harsh and sarcastic, reaction Wednesday after he recanted a story that he was aboard an Army helicopter that was hit with enemy fire in Iraq and forced to land.

The longtime NBC News journalist apologized in an interview with Stars & Stripes, saying he had “misremembered” what happened. He was actually in another nearby helicopter.

“I would not have chosen to make this mistake,” Williams told the newspaper. “I don’t know what screwed up in my mind that caused me to conflate one aircraft with another.”

The story drew immediate scorn online, where critics — including veterans and retired baseball star Curt Schilling — questioned how it would have been possible to make that mistake.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...

TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
 
There will be more of these "misremembers" because it's time for the media liars to clear the air and get ready for the Hillary Show.
1 posted on February 5, 2015 at 6:46:29 AM EST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
This won’t go away until he either resigns/retires or he recants his recant. He didn’t misremember. It is patently absurd to believe it was his memory playing tricks on him.

He outright lied. He lied because he and others like him lie regularly to the population at large in their so-called trusted stewardship of the “truth.” That perhaps is the biggest lie of all.


2 posted on February 5, 2015 at 6:50:30 AM EST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: Gaffer
I’ve detested this POS since he apologized for the obvious grimace when announcing W had won in 2000.

These commissars aren’t even hiding their contempt for us anymore.


3 posted on February 5, 2015 at 6:52:52 AM EST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
Brian Williams faces fierce mockery after recanting Iraq war story...
As well he should! Whatever little credibility NBC News had, this blows it out of the water. No way he survives in his current position.

4 posted on February 5, 2015 at 6:59:14 AM EST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
“I would not have chosen to make this mistake,” Williams told the newspaper
Huh?

5 posted on February 5, 2015 at 6:59:43 AM EST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: Gaffer
“Fake but accurate” - didn’t Dan Rather get into some pretty deep waters with this approach to the news?

And what about Herself, Madame Benghazi, the Cold & Joyless, ducking “enemy fire” upon her arrival in Bosnia in 1996.

Just trying to give snipers a bad name. Herself was NEVER in any danger.


6 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:00:50 AM EST by alloysteel (The Internet is like an icy sidewalk. One slip, and BOOM!, down you go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
These clowns stopped being ‘journalists’ LOOOOOOONG ago.

The viewers are the dupes in all this, because all THEY have to do is tune them out!


7 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:03:18 AM EST by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: kearnyirish2
I wonder if anyone ever made a good gif of that grimace?


8 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:05:50 AM EST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
Bob Woodruff and David Bloom were unavailable for comment.
-PJ

9 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:06:55 AM EST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
Musta been the same guys who were shooting at Brian Williams who shot at Hillary as she stood on the tarmac in a receiving line in Bosnia.


10 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:07:15 AM EST by USNA74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: alloysteel
Liberals lie. All the time.


11 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:07:32 AM EST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
 
12 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:07:57 AM EST by New Perspective (Proud father of a son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: alloysteel
They’ve largely gotten away with these constant lies before because they controlled the bulk of what Americans see on TV and read in print (when they read).

With the spread of the internet and decline of MSM’s influence, these lies aren’t as easy to hide any more.

Whenever his name is mentioned, wherever, it should be appended with Proven Liar.


13 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:09:40 AM EST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
Great war heroes of the left ... John "Killer" Kerry, Tom "Ace" Harkin and Brian "Crash" Williams.
All served in the Stolen Valor division.

14 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:10:07 AM EST by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
It is fascinating to see the double standard at work. Williams is liberal, so this will be swept under the rug. If a conservative commentator did it, it would be a topic 24/7 until the person resigned or offed themselves.


15 posted on 02/05/2015 4:10:16 AM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: wbarmy
I’ve seen it on this site, especially soon after it happened; it was strange, as though someone in the studio had to point out to him how obvious his bias was. When they cut back to him after a break, he apologized for it.


16 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:10:24 AM EST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
How do you “misremember” a lie?


17 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:11:22 AM EST by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: Renkluaf
Ask the Ferguson witnesses (who got away with outright falsifying reports); some even admitted later that they weren’t even present (after swearing to Brown’s coldblooded execution by Officer Wilson)...


18 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:13:58 AM EST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]
To: tobyhill
Bullcrap.


19 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:15:09 AM EST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
To: rbg81
Undeniably true.


20 posted on February 5, 2015 at 7:19:26 AM EST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search      News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39387
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39387
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #192 on: February 10, 2015, 10:57:28 AM »
One of the most dishonest aspects of his political career. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #193 on: February 24, 2015, 10:56:40 AM »
VA Secretary Robert McDonald Falsely Claimed He Served In 'Special Forces'
Posted: 02/23/2015


WASHINGTON -- Robert McDonald, the secretary of veterans affairs, wrongly claimed in a videotaped comment earlier this year that he served in the Army's elite special forces, when his military service of five years was in fact spent almost entirely with the 82nd Airborne Division during the late 1970s.

U.S. special operations forces (SOF) are composed of exhaustively trained and highly capable troops from each military service, including the Army Rangers, Delta Force, Navy SEALs and Army Special Forces (also known as the Green Berets) -- but not the 82nd Airborne. They are certified to undertake the most dangerous and delicate missions, including, famously, the killing of Osama bin Laden in May 2011. Special operators are a close-knit community deeply hostile to outsiders who try to claim the coveted mantle of special operations.

McDonald, a retired corporate executive who took over the VA last June as the agency was sinking in scandal, made the claim in late January as he was touring a rundown Los Angeles neighborhood during a nationwide count of homeless veterans. He was accompanied by a CBS-TV news crew, which recorded an exchange between McDonald and a homeless man who told McDonald he had served in special forces.

“Special forces? What years? I was in special forces!” McDonald told the homeless man. That exchange was broadcast in a Jan. 30 CBS News story about the VA’s efforts to find and house homeless veterans.

In fact, McDonald never served in special forces. He graduated from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in 1975, completed Army Ranger training and took courses in jungle, arctic and desert warfare. He qualified as a senior parachutist and airborne jumpmaster, and was assigned to the 82nd Airborne Division until he resigned his commission in 1980. While he earned a Ranger tab designating him as a graduate of Ranger School, he never served in a Ranger battalion or any other special operations unit.

“I have no excuse,” McDonald told The Huffington Post, when contacted to explain his claim. “I was not in special forces.”

McDonald’s remark came to light after several retired military officers noticed his remark on the CBS tape, days after NBC News anchor Brian Williams was suspended for fabricating stories about his reporting experiences in Iraq and elsewhere.

McDonald told The Huffington Post that he “wanted to clear up the confusion I probably created -- I did create” in the exchange with the homeless man in L.A. Saying he was in special forces, McDonald said, “is not right. I was not in special forces. What I said was wrong.”

McDonald said he has many friends in the special forces community “and I have great respect for special forces.” But, he added, “as I thought about this later I knew this [claim] was wrong."

When the homeless veteran claimed to have served in special forces, McDonald said, “I reacted spontaneously and I reacted wrongly, [with] no intent in any way to describe my record any different than it is.”

“It was wrong,” said retired Army Col. Gary Bloomberg, a former senior special forces commander who had not seen the video before being contacted by The Huffington Post. When he first watched it, Bloomberg said, “I thought, 'What a boneheaded statement -- is this what we want from our senior government officials?'”

Bloomberg said he checked around with others in the special forces community, which is normally quick to jump on SOF impostors in the same way that the Stolen Valor organization hunts down and exposes people who wear unearned military decorations and honors.

Bloomberg said he talked to several other former special operators, “and no one got really crazy about the whole thing, compared to some of what we’ve seen,” he said. “It’s a lot different from guys running around faking their special forces credentials.”

Several times a month, Bloomberg said, an email message will bounce around the SOF community asking for information on someone claiming special forces status. “When it turns out the guy doesn’t have it," he said, "the community goes to great lengths to expose it.”

In McDonald’s case, he said, “I can see [other former special forces soldiers] going, ‘Hey, check out this boneheaded remark,’ but I don’t see the gravitas that I would with a guy wearing medals he didn’t earn.”

McDonald, the former chairman, president and CEO of the consumer products giant Procter & Gamble, was selected by President Barack Obama to replace Eric Shinseki, the retired Army general who resigned in disgrace last May following reports of widespread corruption and malfeasance within the VA.

The White House said Monday evening that the Obama administration accepted McDonald's explanation.

"Secretary McDonald has apologized for the misstatement and noted that he never intended to misrepresent his military service," the White House said in a statement. "We take him at his word and expect that this will not impact the important work he’s doing to promote the health and well-being of our nation’s veterans."

UPDATE: Feb. 24, 11 a.m. -- Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla), chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, said he was "disappointed" in McDonald's claim that he served in special forces.

"After a rough couple of weeks that also included inflated claims of accountability at the Department of Veterans Affairs, I hope Sec. McDonald will redouble his efforts to ensure his statements -- and those of all VA officials -- are completely accurate," Miller said in a statement Tuesday. "This is the only way the department can regain the trust of the veterans and taxpayers it is charged with serving.”

Clarification: Language has been added to clarify specific military terms regarding special operations forces and the conclusion of McDonald's service.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/23/robert-mcdonald-special-forces_n_6739184.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000058

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #194 on: March 06, 2015, 08:57:34 AM »
Fox News Poll: Views of Obama’s honesty hit new low, fewer say he’s patriotic
By Dana Blanton
Published March 05, 2015
FoxNews.com

Most voters believe the United States is the best country in the world.  Far fewer of them believe Barack Obama agrees, according to a Fox News poll released Thursday.

The new poll also finds the numbers saying Obama is patriotic, honest or a strong leader have all declined in the past few years.

More Americans feel they love the United States than think Obama does: 83 percent think the U.S. is the greatest country in the world. Just 64 percent believe Obama feels the same way.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE POLL RESULTS

The difference in the two perceptions is mainly partisan: 90 percent of Republicans think the U.S. is the best, while only 42 percent believe the president agrees. Among Democrats, 82 percent feel this is the greatest nation, and even more -- 88 percent -- believe Obama feels that.

Those who are most likely to feel the U.S. is the best nation in the world include voters over age 65 (93 percent) as well as Republicans (90 percent).  Those least likely to feel that way include voters who identify with the Tea Party movement (79 percent), self-identified independents (73 percent) and voters under age 35 (71 percent).

Overall, 54 percent of voters say Obama is patriotic, yet that’s down from 60 percent who felt that way in 2011.  Again, party identification matters:  the number of Republicans today who think the president is patriotic is down six percentage points from 2011, among independents it’s down four points and for Democrats it’s down one.

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani caused an uproar in February by questioning whether Barack Obama loves America.  The poll shows 42 percent of voters nationally think there are “legitimate reasons to doubt” whether Obama loves America.  That includes 66 percent of Republicans, 42 percent of independents and 17 percent of Democrats.

Fewer voters than ever before see Obama as honest: a record-low 43 percent.  And for the first time since 2007, a majority, 54 percent, disagrees that the president is “honest.”

Three-quarters of Democrats currently think Obama is honest (75 percent), while just 39 percent of independents and 15 percent of Republicans say the same.

For comparison, in 2011 some 57 percent of voters described Obama as honest.  That included 86 percent of Democrats, 53 percent of independents and 26 percent of Republicans.

The poll also finds 43 percent of voters think Obama is a “strong leader.”  That’s down from a high of 60 percent who said he was a “strong and decisive” leader in 2009.

Of the four traits tested, Obama does best on “caring,” as 60 percent of voters feel that describes him.  Although there’s been a decline here too: 68 percent said Obama was “caring” in 2011.

The Fox News poll is conducted by telephone with live interviewers under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R).  The 1,011 registered voters were reached via landline and cell phone numbers randomly selected for inclusion in this nationwide survey from March 1-3, 2015.  The full poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/05/fox-news-poll-views-obamas-honesty-hits-new-low-fewer-say-hes-patriotic/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #195 on: April 03, 2015, 10:34:00 AM »
Disgusting.

Harry Reid Relishes Romney Tax Lie: 'He Didn't Win, Did He?'
Wednesday, 01 Apr 2015
By Jennifer G. Hickey

More than two years after he falsely accused Mitt Romney of failing to pay his taxes, retiring Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid has no regrets – and appears to relish – leveling serious charges in the midst of a presidential campaign.

"No, I don't regret that at all. No one would help me. They were afraid the Koch brothers would go after them, so I did it on my own," Reid said in response to a question from CNN's Dana Bash.

Story continues below video.


When asked about critics who said his smear of then-Republican presidential candidate Romney echoed the tactics of Sen. Joseph McCarthy, he brushed them off and said with a smile, "Romney didn't win, did he?"

Reid, who has announced he will not seek another term in office, has remained unapologetic since he initially claimed without evidence or justification the rumor that Romney had avoided paying taxes for nearly a decade.

And some believe his refusal to acknowledge the false nature of the allegations, as well as the defense offered by his fellow Democrats, reflects a deeper problem.

"As he approaches his retirement in December 2016, Reid will no doubt be lauded by members of his own party, by at least some people on the other side of the aisle, and no doubt by the president of the United States. None of them will ever make mention of Reid's obvious fabrications, the irresponsible nature of his claims, or the fact that he has no regrets for what he did. And that's a problem," writes Doug Mataconis, a contributor to The Christian Science Monitor.

Before he repeated the charges on the floor of the Senate, Reid suggested in a July 31, 2012 interview with The Huffington Post that a Bain investor told him that Romney had not paid taxes for ten years and that is why he refused to release his full tax returns.

According to Reid, someone called his office in the early summer of 2012 and said, "Harry, he didn't pay any taxes for 10 years."

"He didn't pay taxes for 10 years! Now, do I know that that's true? Well, I'm not certain. But obviously he can't release those tax returns," he told The Huffington Post, but refused to identify the caller.

Despite the fact Reid did not provide evidence to support his claims, fellow Democrats, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi came to the Nevadan's defense.

"If he has said somebody told him that, some credible source, then I believe that," the California Democrat told reporters after a campaign appearance in Florida, according to The Associated Press.

She said it was "up to Gov. Romney to release his returns" and disprove the allegations.

Reid's charges, however, were not accepted without question by everyone. The Washington Post gave him "four pinocchios" days after he first smeared Romney.

"Reid also has made no effort to explain why his unnamed source would be credible. So, in the absence of more information, it appears he has no basis to make his incendiary claim. Moreover, Reid holds a position of great authority in the U.S. Congress.  He should hold himself to a high standard of accuracy when making claims about political opponents," said the Post in August 2012.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Harry-Reid-Mitt-Romney-2012-election-taxes/2015/04/01/id/635842/#ixzz3WGiWAxAo

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #196 on: April 10, 2015, 03:06:30 PM »
POLL: HILLARY TRAILS RAND IN IOWA, COLORADO–MORE VOTERS BELIEVE SHE’S ‘NOT HONEST & TRUSTWORTHY’

AFP Photo
by BREITBART NEWS
9 Apr 2015

Hillary Clinton is losing ground in three more key swing states, including Iowa, which holds the first-in-the-nation caucuses and derailed Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid, and trails Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) in two of them as more voters do not view her as “honest and trustworthy” in the wake of her private email scandal, according to a new Quinnipiac poll.

Voters in Colorado, Iowa, and Virginia do not think Clinton is “honest and trustworthy,” and Clinton’s leads over potential Republican opponents have diminished in hypothetical head-to-head match-ups. For instance, Paul, who formally launched his presidential campaign this week and blasted Clinton for her private email scandal and the “shenanigans” associated with donations to her family’s foundation, leads Clinton in Colorado 44% to 41%. Clinton trails Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker (42%-41%) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who is expected to announce his candidacy on this month, (41%-40%) and is virtually tied with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee in the state.

In Colorado, Clinton has a negative favorability rating (41%-51%), down from her 46%-47% favorability rating in February. Fifty-six percent of Colorado voters do not view her has “honest and trustworthy” and a majority of Colorado voters believe her email scandal is important to their vote.

“Ominous for Hillary Clinton is the broad scope of the movement today compared to her showing in Quinnipiac University’s mid-February survey. It isn’t just one or two Republicans who are stepping up; it’s virtually the entire GOP field that is running better against her,” said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll. “That’s why it is difficult to see Secretary Clinton’s slippage as anything other than a further toll on her image from the furor over her e-mail.”

In Iowa, Paul edges Clinton (43%-42%), who is virtually tied with nearly every potential Republican opponent. Clinton barely leads New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (41%-39%), former Florida Governor Jeb Bush (41%-40%), Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (44%-40%), and Sen. Ted Cruz (43%-40%) in the state. She has a negative favorability rating in Iowa (45%-47%), down from her positive 49%-40% rating in February in that state. A plurality of Iowa voters (49%-43%) do not think she is “honest and trustworthy” and a majority believe the email scandal is important in their vote.

Clinton lost Iowa to Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary, ultimately finishing third after her advisers had debated whether she should even compete in the state. Obama’s Iowa win galvanized his supporters in other states who were uncertain about whether Obama could win and ultimately propelled him to his party’s nomination and the presidency.

Virginia, where Clinton ally Terry McAuliffe is governor, is Clinton’s strongest state. She leads Paul 47% to 43% in the increasingly important swing state. She has a 48%-45% positive favorability rating, virtually unchanged from her 48%-44% rating in February. But a majority of voters in the state (52%-40%) believe that Clinton is “not honest and trustworthy.” Clinton’s email scandal is also important to a majority of Virginia voters (51%-47%).

Brown, the assistant director of the poll, said that “running as a competent but dishonest candidate has serious potential problems” for Clinton.

A Quinnipiac poll released on March 31 found that voters in three other swing states–Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida–also did not view Clinton as honest and trustworthy. Clinton trailed Paul in Pennsylvania as her favorability ratings slipped in each of those swing states after her private email scandal. Brown said “these numbers are a boost for U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky as he formally launches his campaign.”

Quinnipiac polled the three swing states (Iowa, Colorado, Virginia) from March 29-April 7, and the margin of error is +/- 3.3 percentage points for Colorado and +/- 3.2 percentage points for Virginia and Iowa.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/09/poll-hillary-trails-rand-in-iowa-colorado-more-voters-believe-shes-not-honest-trustworthy/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #197 on: April 20, 2015, 04:06:48 PM »
Horrible spin.

Hillary fudges the truth about her ‘immigrant’ grandparents
By Joe Tacopino
April 16, 2015

Hillary Rodham Clinton fudged her family history at a campaign appearance in Iowa Wednesday when she described her grandparents as immigrants.
“All my grandparents, you know, came over here and, you know, my grandfather went to work in a lace mill in Scranton, Pa.,” Clinton said.

But, according to documents posted on Buzzfeed.com, only one of her grandparents immigrated, while the others were born in the United States shortly after their parents arrived.

A spokesperson for Clinton said that although her grandparents were not officially immigrants, they regularly spoke about the “immigrant experience.”
“As a result, she has always thought of them as immigrants,” the spokesman told BuzzFeed News.

http://nypost.com/2015/04/16/hillary-fudges-the-truth-about-her-immigrant-grandparents/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Integrity
« Reply #198 on: April 23, 2015, 11:14:53 AM »
 :-\

Go to the link to watch the clip.

Flashback: Watch Hillary Clinton defend heterosexual marriage as a 'fundamental bedrock principle'
BY PHILIP KLEIN | APRIL 22, 2015

It's widely known that Hillary Clinton's views on gay marriage have "evolved," but that terminology drastically understates the extent to which she has changed her opinion on the subject to keep up with the times.

It wasn't long ago that Clinton sounded much more like a staunch social conservative than a gay rights champion on the issue, describing marriage as a "fundamental bedrock principle" going back "into the mists of history" that was primarily about raising children.

During 2004 Senate floor debate, Clinton argued that though she opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment that would have amended the Constitution to make marriage between a man and a woman because she thought the issue should be a state matter, she wanted to make it crystal clear that this in no way suggested she wanted to change the definition of marriage.

"I believe that marriage is not just a bond but a sacred bond between a man and a woman," Clinton said. "I have had occasion in my life to defend marriage, to stand up for marriage, to believe in the hard work and challenge of marriage. So I take umbrage at anyone who might suggest that those of us who worry about amending the Constitution are less committed to the sanctity of marriage, or to the fundamental bedrock principle that exists between a man and a woman, going back into the mists of history as one of the founding, foundational institutions of history and humanity and civilization, and that its primary, principal role during those millennia has been the raising and socializing of children for the society into which they are to become adults."

Between 2004 and 2013, when she came out in favor of gay marriage, public opinion on the issue changed dramatically. More recently, Clinton has abandoned the idea that marriage should be a state issue and expressed hope that the Supreme Court would declare a Constitutional right to gay marriage that would prohibit states from keeping marriage between a man and a woman. Though naturally, her campaign is trying to blame the media for creating the impression that her views have changed.

To say Clinton "evolved" on gay marriage is sort of like saying Peter Parker changed slightly after he got bitten by a radioactive spider.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/flashback-watch-hillary-clinton-defend-heterosexual-marriage-as-a-fundamental-bedrock-principle/article/2563454

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Integrity
« Reply #199 on: April 23, 2015, 03:39:40 PM »
this is the problem with hilary.  she's been vetted for 20 years now.

the "breaking" news about her is a slight lie in her grandparents voyage, one that we excused with Rubio on his parents, one that we excused with jeb on his voter form heritage, etc.

I want to hear "Hilary will borrow $ until we're broke, she will be soft on global currency, she will cave to NKorea and Bush/obama did, she has no control over Iran situation, she can't fix anything" - and reasons why.

if we're in 2015 and the worst shit on hilary is "her staff didn't tip at a fcking chipolte where there wasn't even a waitress" or "her van paused to let her out in an empty handicapped strip", then the GOP is in serious fcking trouble!

Can repubs please share, right now, 5 reasons america fails is Hilary wins in 2016?  Without resorting to the silly shit, please.   (oh, and only attack 240 on this personally if you reek of kenyan semen).