Issa went on the public airwaves last week and said that IRS agents “were directly being ordered from Washington,”
yet this lying piece of shit won't actually release the testimony from last week which refutes Issa's claim and make him look like a liar
hmm, doesn't the public have a right to know the full truth of the nefarious dealings of the IRS
Could it really be that Issa's is just on a political witch hunt and when testimony that contradicts his beliefs is made that he simply refuses to release it.
Issa is willing to tell us what his "gut" is telling him but won't actually release testimony that proves his "gut" is lying to him
Eventually this will come out and Issa can add another political failure to his long list
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/06/09/democrats-say-conservative-irs-employee-refutes-charges-of-white-house-meddling/http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/09/cummings-calls-issas-irs-bluff-ill-release-transcripts-clearing-white-house-if-he-doesnt/But in the interview excerpts released by Cummings, the charge of political motivation is refuted by the Cincinnati manager, who described himself to investigators as a “conservative Republican.”
“I do not believe that the screening of these cases had anything to do other than consistency and identifying issues that needed to have further development,” the manager said, according to the document released by the Democratic staff of the Oversight Committee.
The excerpts indicate the manager was later asked whether he had “any reason to believe that anyone in the White House was involved in the decision to screen Tea Party cases.”
The manager replied “I have no reason to believe that.”
“My gut tells me that too many people knew this wrongdoing was going on before the election, and at least by some sort of convenient, benign neglect, allowed it to go on through the election,” Issa said. “I’m not making any allegations as to motive, that they set out to do it, but certainly people knew it was happening.”
But in the interview excerpts released by Cummings, the charge of political motivation is refuted by the Cincinnati manager, who described himself to investigators as a “conservative Republican.”
“I do not believe that the screening of these cases had anything to do other than consistency and identifying issues that needed to have further development,” the manager said, according to the document released by the Democratic staff of the Oversight Committee.
The excerpts indicate the manager was later asked whether he had “any reason to believe that anyone in the White House was involved in the decision to screen Tea Party cases.”
The manager replied “I have no reason to believe that.”
