« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux  (Read 2535 times)

Nomad

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3457
McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« on: July 22, 2013, 12:32:47 PM »
True Adonis, you've been summoned for yet another round where you are tasked with defending McDonalds.

http://documentarylovers.com/news/jamie-oliver-campaign-makes-mcdonalds-change-recipe/

Logged
all drugs - TPPIIP

Deutsch

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2013, 12:37:32 PM »
WOW.  That is ridiculous.
Logged

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40804
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2013, 01:16:10 PM »
Thanks boss.

 8) 8) 8)
Logged
7

FitnessFrenzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28958
  • evolving
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2013, 02:13:51 PM »
Logged

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2013, 02:33:01 PM »
I'm confused, I thought TA said McDonalds only used the best?   ???
Logged

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2013, 02:34:34 PM »
Quote from: Twaddle on July 22, 2013, 02:33:01 PM
I'm confused, I thought TA said McDonalds only used the best?   ???

No, he said McDonald's hamburgers are 100% beef, which is correct.
Logged
✠

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2013, 02:40:30 PM »
Yum

Makes me wanna go get a Big Mac and Double quarter Pounder   :P
Logged

Nomad

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3457
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2013, 02:41:40 PM »
Quote from: P.I.P on July 22, 2013, 02:34:34 PM
No, he said McDonald's hamburgers are 100% beef, which is correct.

If you want to say that the collagen, guts and etc that McDonalds uses in their burgers is "beef" well then that's your opinion.

Seems like if someone really pushes McDs on the exact meaning of "beef" that they use in burgers, McDs will have to cave in and admit that it uses the worst possible parts of a cow for their burgers.
Logged
all drugs - TPPIIP

dustin

  • Guest
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2013, 03:02:15 PM »
I don't mind junk food from time to time, but I prefer stuff that's closer to real food than what's in fast food.

But, I won't be a pretentious little bitch. Anyone who says a nice fat Big Mac is gross is a hypocritical liar. They're fucking delicious. I love double Big Macs with extra large fries.
Logged

ukjeff

  • Guest
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2013, 03:12:05 PM »
Why would anyone listen to fat fuck Jamie Oliver?
Logged

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2013, 03:25:15 PM »
Quote from: Nomad on July 22, 2013, 02:41:40 PM
If you want to say that the collagen, guts and etc that McDonalds uses in their burgers is "beef" well then that's your opinion.

Seems like if someone really pushes McDs on the exact meaning of "beef" that they use in burgers, McDs will have to cave in and admit that it uses the worst possible parts of a cow for their burgers.
It's not just McDonalds... he was saying it's in 70% of ALL GROUND BEEF PRODUCTS, meaning it's everywhere, from the grocery stores to McDonalds. Terrifying.
Logged

Nomad

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3457
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2013, 03:33:37 PM »
Quote from: ukjeff on July 22, 2013, 03:12:05 PM
Why would anyone listen to fat fuck Jamie Oliver?

He is giving his opinion as a chef, not as a male fitness model.
Logged
all drugs - TPPIIP

Nicademus

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1337
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #12 on: July 22, 2013, 04:00:58 PM »
He's not asking to ban it just to label it.  That seems more than reasonable.
Logged

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2013, 04:03:20 PM »
Quote from: ukjeff on July 22, 2013, 03:12:05 PM
Why would anyone listen to fat fuck Jamie Oliver?

That was my first thought.
Logged
A

Nicademus

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1337
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #14 on: July 22, 2013, 04:03:57 PM »
Quote from: ukjeff on July 22, 2013, 03:12:05 PM
Why would anyone listen to fat fuck Jamie Oliver?
What do you care.  You've been eating horse meat.
Logged

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31826
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #15 on: July 22, 2013, 04:15:02 PM »
Good use of scraps that don't end up as waste.  I can only imagine what Taco Bell uses.
Logged

dustin

  • Guest
Re: McDonalds vs Nutritionist part Deux
« Reply #16 on: July 22, 2013, 04:33:48 PM »
Quote from: ukjeff on July 22, 2013, 03:12:05 PM
Why would anyone listen to fat fuck Jamie Oliver?

Because he cooks for all the reasons that bodybuilders don't.

This isn't some Dusty Hanshaw loser who can't get anywhere in bodybuilding.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »