The simple fact of the matter is that the target audience that Obamacare is intended for already have free health care anyway. It's called welfare.
False - millions are losing what they have due to GhettoCare as it is.
the target audience that Obamacare is intended for
You obviously can't read and process anything before rushing to post huh?The people that already have healthcare isn't the target audience that Obamacare benefits.
You obviously have a higher level of Teh Stupid than I gave you credit for.My post has absolutely nothing to do in regards to people who already have health care. Quite the opposite.
and you dont think obamacare will affect people who already have health care? please tell me you're not that short sighted.
Yes. But that is irrelevant to the point I stated. Obamacare was never intended to benefit the people who have health care. They people who benefit from it are those that (alledgedly) do not have health care. Obamacare is nothing more than a mass extension and continuation of welfare. (Medicaid)
^^ still unable to understand a simple concept.Let me break down even further for your stupid ass since you apparently need to have it spoon fed for you.Obamacare is basically health insurance welfare for those who don't want to work a job and earn it themselves correct?
Delusional.
You obviously can't answer a simple yes or no question.Let's try it again.Who does Obamacare benefit?
Single-payer?How about you look at other nations that have single-payer and come back to tell us how that is working out for them.
It's working out GREAT for my cousins in Toronto. Not to mention all the single payer countries rank way ahead of us. You are entitled to your opinion, but not your own facts.
Then why didn't that chooming creep push that in the first place?
Because unlike your side would have everyone believe, the guy is not a liberal. He's Gerald Ford/Bob Dole in black face. Believe me, I was and still am sickened by the way he started out negotiating health care from the Bob Dole/Mitt Romney model. That doesn't change the fact that our country is better off with the ACA than without it.
lmfao but I bet you think bush was a far right loon, right?and nancy pelosi isnt bat shit crazy, right?hahah when you grow up life is going to slap you right across the face young man
No, Bush was/is just a dumb fuck puppet of the neo-cons.
there is so much stupid in this post i can't even find a place to begin a rebuttal. basically because there are some things paid for by the taxpayers then the entire private sector should be wiped out of existence? because the private sector has given us nothing right? i'm sorry but this is the most idiotic, most vapid post i've seen on this board.......ever. may god have mercy on your soul.
Ahead of us in what? Certainly not technology and quality of care. Even some Canadian government officials in the past have sought medical care in the USA. I wonder why that is? Maybe is because in the USA no one has to wait 3 to 4 months for an MRI. Maybe is because in the USA no one has to wait 6 months for an operation. Maybe is because we still have on average very good doctors and not the mediocrity that barely passed medical school and survived residency by the skin of their teeth.Oh, but don't worry. This country is well on its way to having many doctors leave the profession and having very poor quality of care due to Obamacrapcare. We will be in the same level or even worse compared to Canada. Yeah. Can't wait.
You were saying?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Organization_ranking_of_health_systems
