This is what happens when you allow a madman to call the shots while everyone cowers in fear.
And, sorry, but if you don't realize what sort of absolute degenerate holds the bulk of the money in this world, then you've got a lot to learn.
Holey Moley!!!! I'm almost speechless, ...but not really. This concept isn't really all that new.
I've never seen or heard of a country expropriating ownership rights without compensation in order to do it tho.
A good friend of mine is an elderly Indian investor. A Brahmin man whose portfolio consists of stocks, bonds, real estate, gold., etc., etc., He occasionally gives me investing advice, tips etc., and one day he was telling me about some of the shares he had and how they had performed over the years.
One of the things they used to do was buy up shares of a company, ...and have relatives run them. This way they knew the company would be well run. A few Brahmin families would get together and decide so & so's son is qualified to run the company, and they would buy up 51% of the shares, then install so & so's son to run the company.
The only companies he didn't do that with were the big multi nationals, however, he did tell me that the only reason he was even able to own shares in companies like Unilever, Colgate etc etc was because when these companies came to India, and started buying up land, the Indian government made them stipulate than 51% of the shares issued in India had to go to Indians. Had it not been for that he said, the British would have reaped all the profits.
This type of nationalism isn't new. Canada employs it's own brand of nationalism over what it considers strategic industries. This is one of the reasons the recent potash sale did not go through. We have certain industries where it is stipulated that a certain percentage MUST be Canadian owned.
Case in point... Netflix crushed the home video markets destroying Blockbuster Video in the process. Blockbuster Canada was very profitable, however, there was so much red ink flowing stateside, the Canadian division was too negatively impacted, and despite initial optimism that they could retain the Cdn div, but close the stores stateside, ...they ended up closing them all.
Often, what alot of these companies would do is simply trim costs, by cutting jobs outside of the home country of the corp, leaving foreign economies devastated.
By stipulating a certain percentage of ownership must be local, ...it ensures the wealth of the community is recirculated within that community, and not siphoned off and exported off shore, as it is now in many cases.
What I find hilarious or rather ironic in that article is the expressed notion that Mugabe was "introducing economic apartheid". Oh Puleaze! What the heck did they think was in place for so many years? Does it only become economic apartheid when it excludes you?
ps: While Mugabe's move is not unprecedented, I can certainly see where people take issue with it.
pps: Mugabe needs a new publicist. His PR person is asleep at the wheel.