They both sound like shit.
"Go into action only when it's needed?" Sounds a lot like Obama.
Nobody is suggesting a politician should just sit on their ass, but they should have a real reason that
the people need and want to act and most often that is not the case whatsoever in any form or shape... actually often they act completely against the best interest of the people in favor of......................
...?
We've become the nation with the most laws ever in the history of all nations. To date we have more laws than any other nation at any time in history and we also have the highest percentage of our population incarcerated among all other nations.. That's a hard pill to swallow for what is supposed to be the country with the most freedom. In this free country of The United States of America, we don't need that level of totalitarianism. It is not good when you have an increasing amount of people who want to move to Alaska, Canada or Mexico just so they can do something as simple as build a house without having to pay an extra 30,000+ in inspection fees and other mandated costs. Or whatever. We're lawed and inspected to death here. it's getting a little fucking overkill.
I would be all for voting on a politician who said his main goal was to review laws and get rid of shit that is BS.
and shit, it must suck total assbags if a person from Wyoming is bitching about this.... The rest of you are already 15 years or so in the future lol.