Author Topic: 'not front chest, side chest'  (Read 4171 times)

flex933

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #25 on: September 01, 2013, 09:03:30 AM »
Holy crap ....Lou is massive but here he looks more like a swimmer

hench

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8047
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #26 on: September 01, 2013, 11:09:12 AM »
lou disappeared in most poses but double biceps and most muscular, side chest was good but nothing like arnolds
Holy crap ....Lou is massive but here he looks more like a swimmer

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #27 on: September 01, 2013, 11:13:34 AM »
lou disappeared in most poses but double biceps and most muscular, side chest was good but nothing like arnolds

It's funny when Louie's Dad says: "You got arms Louie, he's got spaghetti arms!"

hench

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8047
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #28 on: September 01, 2013, 12:45:24 PM »
matty trying to talk louie into winning but arnold talked him out of it  ;D
Not that Louie had the goods to take him anyway.
It's funny when Louie's Dad says: "You got arms Louie, he's got spaghetti arms!"

old-school-lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2685
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #29 on: September 02, 2013, 09:10:07 PM »
:)

Dorian's got a very small package (no homo)

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #30 on: September 03, 2013, 05:31:47 AM »
ārnold was all pecs, bicep and calves

NotMrAverage

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2168
  • SCHPORT
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #31 on: September 03, 2013, 06:17:26 AM »
Arnold had something special to his look but still very incomeplete. Especially Hamstrings, abs nd shoulders were not there. He was almost all Bis, Chest and Calves. Bis and Chest were outstanding for any time. Even if tris were not that good his upper arms did look great in most poses.

In 1980 Olympia Arnold did not even do rear latsspread and side triceps. I wonder why? They did not suck THAT bad. I still tihnk he should have gotten the win that year. But not doing 2 of the mandatories? Judges did'nt seem to care to much either. I think he did a single bicep pose with the other arm at 90 degrees instead of side tri. For rear latspread most muscular  ;D

I wonder how his drug stack changed in 1980 as well? He did starve himself for sure bit there is something else to it. I think he went away from the Primo-Dbol combo and went some other route...
MIRAGETROPIN

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #32 on: September 03, 2013, 07:08:08 AM »
ārnold was all pecs, bicep and calves

Amen!

TheShape

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 596
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #33 on: September 03, 2013, 07:55:47 AM »
ārnold was all pecs, bicep and calves

That's all that matters.

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #34 on: September 03, 2013, 07:58:16 AM »
That's all that matters.
he looked great but i'm pointing out the fact


no comparison to ronnie coleman, that black and white photoshop comparison is a farce

Papper

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10323
  • Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.
Re: 'not front chest, side chest'
« Reply #35 on: September 03, 2013, 12:23:12 PM »
lou disappeared in most poses but double biceps and most muscular, side chest was good but nothing like arnolds

louie had good chest and arms. probably why those poses worked for him.

but for his height he looked good in his day.