Russia compiles 100 page document it claims proves Rebels did the gas attack

[Soul Crusher]

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/09/05/201268/russia-releases-100-page-report.html#.Uii1tD7D_IU


Booommmmm

[240 is Back]

while i think obama is lying about the syria thing...

it has to be a lot more than just russia saying it, dude.  you know that. 

you can't agree with our major world competitors only when they undermine the dem prez lol.

[Hugo Chavez]

while i think obama is lying about the syria thing...

it has to be a lot more than just russia saying it, dude.  you know that.  

you can't agree with our major world competitors only when they undermine the dem prez lol.

yea ok.  If we can't even fucking release the intercepted phone call we say proves Assad ordered this then you can't bitch about Russia's 100 page case against the rebels either.  Kinda odd to say their info is bogus when we won't even show ours.  Can we at least start with that since Obama seems to want the American people backing this?  A little proof would be nice lol...

[Emmortal]

while i think obama is lying about the syria thing...

it has to be a lot more than just russia saying it, dude.  you know that. 

you can't agree with our major world competitors only when they undermine the dem prez lol.

Why would an army who had been winning the war and pushing the rebels back open up the door to a known invasion by using chemical weapons against it's own people?  What motive would they have to do something like that?

What motive would the rebels have?  Well for one, they know the western media would help spin the story in their favor, they also know the US and allies are itching to replace Assad so a chemical weapons attack would open the door for help.

In this case 2+2 = 4.

[Fury]

Why would an army who had been winning the war and pushing the rebels back open up the door to a known invasion by using chemical weapons against it's own people?  What motive would they have to do something like that?

What motive would the rebels have?  Well for one, they know the western media would help spin the story in their favor, they also know the US and allies are itching to replace Assad so a chemical weapons attack would open the door for help.

In this case 2+2 = 4.

Exactly. The SAA has been laying siege to the area where the attack occurred for about a year now. They have been making gains on a number of fronts, including retaking Al-Qusayr a couple months ago. There was no reason whatsoever for them to use chemical weapons and jeopardize the progress they've been making.

[George Whorewell]

Exactly. The SAA has been laying siege to the area where the attack occurred for about a year now. They have been making gains on a number of fronts, including retaking Al-Qusayr a couple months ago. There was no reason whatsoever for them to use chemical weapons and jeopardize the progress they've been making.

But Assad is a dictator! He fears no reprisals! He has a mustache and so did Hitler! Therefore, America must respond!

[Hugo Chavez]

Exactly. The SAA has been laying siege to the area where the attack occurred for about a year now. They have been making gains on a number of fronts, including retaking Al-Qusayr a couple months ago. There was no reason whatsoever for them to use chemical weapons and jeopardize the progress they've been making.

^^^THIS!!!

Questions need to be asked and assclowns like Sen. Kerry can go fuck themselves if they don't like the questions.

[Hugo Chavez]

But Assad is a dictator! He fears no reprisals! He has a mustache and so did Hitler! Therefore, America must respond!

I think this is an odd moment where most of the people agree on something.  It looks like most people are against this attack on Syria and the few who kinda support it seem like they are unsure and speak without any kind of absolute conviction.  With the exception of True Adonis.  He is sure about what he wants.  Not sure if that's in America's best interest but it's in his whatever that is...

[Soul Crusher]

I think this is an odd moment where most of the people agree on something.  It looks like most people are against this attack on Syria and the few who kinda support it seem like they are unsure and speak without any kind of absolute conviction.  With the exception of True Adonis.  He is sure about what he wants.  Not sure if that's in America's best interest but it's in his whatever that is...

I want some Reporter to ask this of O-TWINK:
 

If we have iron clad proof that Assad ordered the chemical weapons' attack as Obama/Kerry claim, which would be a violation of Geneva Conventions, etc, and crossing a "Red Line" that Obama claims the "World" drew - why are we not presenting said evidence for a war crimes prosecution at the Hague International Criminal Court?