ATP Nadal wins US Open again

[arce1988]

The kid is good


 PED top notch

[SilverSpoon]

Galeniko, you think he is better than Federer who has many more majors?

[AVBG]

Nadal has an edge because of his dominance on clay

[old-school-lifter]

based on records, Federer @ this point in time is better than nadal because he was won more Grand slam tournaments

but nadal is the unidsputed king on clay

with time nadal may pass federer

[arce1988]

 Nadal has won every grand slam event    and will win many more

[Teutonic Knight]

his doc was fuentes,the ped expert.

nadal absolutely destroyed djokovic, the 3rd set when it was 4:4 ,that broke jokers neck,from there nadal rolled all over him lol

nadal is the best player in history imo.

what about juniors, male & female winners both from croatia
nole was good, nadals biceps wins

[anvil]

It seemed at one point in the 3rd set Djokovic hit one really wide, just a stupid horrible shot, and from the moment that happened his face looked like his focus was just COMPLETELY blown.  He never was in the match from that point on and proceeded to get mercilessly destroyed.

[El Diablo Blanco]

how they call federed the best ever when he can't be Nadal is laughable

[arce1988]

can beat federer at his best on grass.

federer could never ever beat nadal on clay.


^

[razzle]

well, numbers of grand slams is not the proper measurement.  It's helps

federer won more so what, nadal won them all, nadal beats everyone head to head, he absolutely dominates hard and clay court. It matters since he's won more and been very consistent the first 9 years of his career

can beat federer at its best on gras. He's not at his best anymoer

federer could never ever beat nadal on clay.He has before

indoor season doesnt count.Yes it does

comeon its gullible to only go by grand slam wins.grand slams are the hardest to win

im serious, nadal is the best there ever was.most rounded, most versatile.Only time will tell

federer is not versatile, he never had a good backhand, piss poor backhand indeed, his downfall, the ones good enough knew exactly how to destruct him through demolishiing his backhand.Look on youtube, his backhand was awesome

nadal can go head to head with federer cross court federers forehand vs nadals backhand(!), and vice versa, its downright murder, nadal crosscourt vs federer backhand:lol

djokovic is somewhat more versatile than federer, but not on nadals level either,only on one of those best of days joker beats nadal.Novak is still #1.

nadal@95% vs anyone at 95%, nadal always wins.

lol@grand slam titles

goes to show never held a racket in hand, such comments.

teuto:well, juniors often dont go long ways in adult circuits

[arce1988]

 

[Shockwave]

what the fuck are you guys blabbering about?

[arce1988]

  Nadal might just win 12 French Open


 

[Army of One]

The nadal when he won his last Wimbledon was the highest peak of any player I've seen play

[nicorulez]

Galeniko, you think he is better than Federer who has many more majors?

Nadal has beaten Federer like a drum for years. His W-L is 21-10 vs Federer. The Fed is great, but he played in an era after Sampras and before Nadal and Djokovic really made their mark. If you had to have one player take your side in a match to the death, you would want Nadal to be that player. He has nads the size of Jupiter lol.

[Slapper]

Not for nothing, but Federer won most of his majors during a particularly weak era. Before he started playing Nadal the only other players he played against in the final of a major that had actually WON a major were an old Agassi and/or Marat Safin. That's why he's now getting beaten by second rated players. His matches with Nadal aren't even worth watching because you know he's getting his ass whooped. His loss against Rafa in the 2008 French Open was probably the worst beating of a # 1 I've witnessed in a tennis court.

And now it's the same with Djokovic: Rafa knows he's in his head now.

It's really something remarkable to watch: If you have to hit 56 shots just to make it to break point you know you're going up shit creek without a paddle. And against Nadal it's like that every ball of every game and every set. That's why he's got a winning record against everyone.

I see Rafa potentially winning 20 majors.