Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
November 22, 2014, 09:55:18 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Pelosi is insane.  (Read 568 times)
Necrosis
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8586


« Reply #25 on: September 25, 2013, 06:47:36 AM »

She has said other things that are plenty crazy. And she's supported/voted for plenty of even crazier things. She's right up there with Michelle Bachmann, Rick Santorum and Steve King.

Clearly not and I would say that craziness as we are generally using it is a spectrum and clearly some ideas linked to crazy are more insidious in nature. I find the bible thumpers the most crazy simply because using personal conversations with imaginary people as a guide to public policy smells like dark ages.

If you are trying to decipher who is crazier then we need some comparisons old man. I was actually looking forward to seeing the battle of the nutjobs.
Report to moderator   Logged
JOHN MATRIX
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 12532


Dems have nothing but Emotion and the Race Card


« Reply #26 on: September 25, 2013, 06:48:37 AM »

she definitely makes idiotic comments once  and awhile (like almost everyone does) but she's nowhere the congenitally insane people like in the House like Michelle Bachman, Louie Gohmert, Steve King,
etc.... who say moronic shit every time they open their mouth

simply no comparison

Joe blowhard biden is the undisputed king of saying stupid shit. No contest. He is full blown retard
Report to moderator   Logged
avxo
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4110


You've given me multiple traumatic brain injuries!


« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2013, 07:12:27 AM »

True. He will go so far as to argue that somehow Bachmann is worse than Pelosi.

Seriously, I can't think of anyone in government who is anywhere as stupid as Pelosi.

Oh I think that in absolute magnitude, Bachmann is more insane than Pelosi, an insane that goes beyond mere politics. But does that really matter? After all, once you reach a certain level of insanity - I believe the colloquial term is "certifiable" - then the differences in degree no longer matter.

Pelosi is a buffoon who thinks she's entitled to control other people's wallets. Bachmann is a buffoon who think she's entitled to control other people's sex life. They're two sides of the same coin, which only seem different because we've made this artificial distinction between the right and the left.

Pelosi and Bachmann are the two wheels at the opposite ends of a torture rack. Either one is enough to cause excruciating pain or even kill you. It doesn't matter who rotates faster. The end result is the same: the person on the rack dies.


Clearly not and I would say that craziness as we are generally using it is a spectrum and clearly some ideas linked to crazy are more insidious in nature. I find the bible thumpers the most crazy simply because using personal conversations with imaginary people as a guide to public policy smells like dark ages.

If you are trying to decipher who is crazier then we need some comparisons old man. I was actually looking forward to seeing the battle of the nutjobs.

No doubt. Some ideas are more insidious than others. For example, I find Pelosi's ideas on the subject of economics and politics insidious. I find Bachmann's ideas on the subject of social issues and politics insidious. Between the two, I'd say that Bachmann makes invidious remarks more often. But as I said, they're both certifiable as far as I'm concerned and my preference would be for neither of them to be involved with politics in any way, shape or form.
Report to moderator   Logged
Necrosis
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8586


« Reply #28 on: September 26, 2013, 06:08:45 AM »



No doubt. Some ideas are more insidious than others. For example, I find Pelosi's ideas on the subject of economics and politics insidious. I find Bachmann's ideas on the subject of social issues and politics insidious. Between the two, I'd say that Bachmann makes invidious remarks more often. But as I said, they're both certifiable as far as I'm concerned and my preference would be for neither of them to be involved with politics in any way, shape or form.

I agree
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!