This pertains to not only Getbig, but other Bodybuilding sites and fans comments, but...
Why does everyone keep saying "X bodybuilder does indeed look good, but he can't place over (Phil, Kai, Etc) because he looked better a different year"
If this was a year over year improvement show, Dennis Wolf would likely be the winner; Dennis has a good shot at winning if they'd allow someone other than Phil to win (basing this on the callouts, or lack there of)
Plus...
Isn't this a BODYBUILDING contest?
Phil is not the most massive, and has conditioning similar to some others on stage.
Kai is absolutely more muscled than Phil, even from back shots.
If Phil is more aesthetically "pleasing", wouldn't Wolf fall into the same "non mass monster" category?
And what is Branch doing on stage? This "hardcore bodybuilding" charade has to stop.
All these competitors really are is modern day weight lifters, with severe drug dependency issues.
They should rotate judges every year, so the same people don't judge the Olympia. (If anyone can weigh in on this, do share).
This judging at the Olympia is getting ridiculous, not only in the main event, but in the 212 as well. Some of the callouts
And the back photo of Phil, Kai, and Wolf says a lot. All 3 have great builds, yet Phil is the smallest.
The judging Is pretty inconsistent decade to decade and year to year ...
