DOCTORS NOTE to send a packed lunch to school

[Roger Bacon]

http://www.momdot.com/a-doctors-note-for-gmos/

[tonymctones]

wow, I would call stephanie and chew her ass out

[Coach is Back!]

Hahahaha, how anyone can take the left and this government seriously is beyond me. lmao.

[Primemuscle]

Hahahaha, how anyone can take the left and this government seriously is beyond me. lmao.

If the note is real, it came from one misguided person, not the left, the right or the government. Get a grip.

[whork]

Hahahaha, how anyone can take the left and this government seriously is beyond me. lmao.

Your an imbecile Coach so no surprise here.

[Hugo Chavez]

If the note is real, it came from one misguided person, not the left, the right or the government. Get a grip.

Yea right, the left didn't have anything to do with it, just like they didn't have anything to do with banning pop and PB&J sandwiches.

And it didn't come from one misguided person, it came from a lunatic leftwing $heeplebitchwhore; a control freak who thinks we should all do the exact same thing, forbid the norm.. .

And yea, I know, republicans pretty much fit this same bill today, can't argue against that.

[JOHN MATRIX]

Yea right, the left didn't have anything to do with it, just like they didn't have anything to do with banning pop and PB&J sandwiches.

And it didn't come from one misguided person, it came from a lunatic leftwing $heeplebitchwhore; a control freak who thinks we should all do the exact same thing, forbid the norm.. .

And yea, I know, republicans pretty much fit this same bill today, can't argue against that.

This.
This absolutely has to do with the left and their ideology, which they pump into the education system as hard as they can

[Necrosis]

Hahahaha, how anyone can take the left and this government seriously is beyond me. lmao.

Obama wrote the note. Imagine that Obama isn't behind everything then you will get how they are taken seriously.

[Necrosis]

Yea right, the left didn't have anything to do with it, just like they didn't have anything to do with banning pop and PB&J sandwiches.

And it didn't come from one misguided person, it came from a lunatic leftwing $heeplebitchwhore; a control freak who thinks we should all do the exact same thing, forbid the norm.. .

And yea, I know, republicans pretty much fit this same bill today, can't argue against that.

Delusional. Is all I can say.

This proposition is absurd. I think it may be an attempt to reduce allergic incidence which is problem, regardless a list of unacceptable foods based on allergies makes the most sense. I went to school with a girl who had to wear a face mask due to MCS, fish would send her into anaphylaxis.

Regardless Obama is to blame.

[JOHN MATRIX]

Delusional. Is all I can say.

This proposition is absurd. I think it may be an attempt to reduce allergic incidence which is problem, regardless a list of unacceptable foods based on allergies makes the most sense. I went to school with a girl who had to wear a face mask due to MCS, fish would send her into anaphylaxis.

Regardless Obama is to blame.

Its not delusional in the least...

[Necrosis]

Its not delusional in the least...

It certainly is if you think this is some leftist agenda to enforce assimilation and mindless automatons. It's an poorly executed idea and reflects this one persons view as mentioned above.

It's a bit paranoid actually.

If you think the motivation is conformity then you are delusional. I assume food is provided? if so, I can understand why food would be the same, it makes perfect fucking sense. I am not sure why food cannot be brought from home? health concerns? I know many schools adopt bans against particular foods, scents based on the population of kids.

It's a simple and childish view of the situation and is a microcosm of the intellectual honesty and process most people participate in.

[240 is Back]

this is the tricky part...

what do you do about the 1st grader that arrives to school with a mountain dew and a snickers bar, every day, in his lunch box?

The kid is 7.  That's what mom puts in his lunch box.  "Soda give me energy and peanuts in the snickers give me protein".

Now, he firmly believes it's a good lunch, cause that what mom says.  It's a horrible lunch, and the kid is in trouble every afternoon for being hyper, not to mention the fcked up development physically he must be having from lunch, and probably breakfast and dinner being equally shitty.

The SOLUTION?  The school lets him keep that lunch, they don't take it, but they ALSO give him a free school lunch to eat.  He doesn't HAVE to eat the chicken and rice and applesauce and milk... but it's given to him.  And usually, the kid will smell the meat and nibble on the free lunch too, and at least get some nutrition.


I was a teacher for 7 years - and it's NOT about some "we want to control your children".  It's more about "this poor 7 year old is hungry every day cause mom sends a water bottle and a cookie, and nothing else".  What this school is doing is stupid, way overboard, but the overall argument "school shuoldn't give my kid a free lunch", well, the kid should have all the nutrients he needs to grow too. 

[Necrosis]

this is the tricky part...

what do you do about the 1st grader that arrives to school with a mountain dew and a snickers bar, every day, in his lunch box?

The kid is 7.  That's what mom puts in his lunch box.  "Soda give me energy and peanuts in the snickers give me protein".

Now, he firmly believes it's a good lunch, cause that what mom says.  It's a horrible lunch, and the kid is in trouble every afternoon for being hyper, not to mention the fcked up development physically he must be having from lunch, and probably breakfast and dinner being equally shitty.

The SOLUTION?  The school lets him keep that lunch, they don't take it, but they ALSO give him a free school lunch to eat.  He doesn't HAVE to eat the chicken and rice and applesauce and milk... but it's given to him.  And usually, the kid will smell the meat and nibble on the free lunch too, and at least get some nutrition.


I was a teacher for 7 years - and it's NOT about some "we want to control your children".  It's more about "this poor 7 year old is hungry every day cause mom sends a water bottle and a cookie, and nothing else".  What this school is doing is stupid, way overboard, but the overall argument "school shuoldn't give my kid a free lunch", well, the kid should have all the nutrients he needs to grow too. 

I think the original idea is better, in this scenario food waste would be high and it's pretty unethical when you are aware that many people are starving. Promotion of a healthy diet should be enforced, it helps all areas including the economy. Having a generation of hyperactive, ill kids who progress to sick, shitty adults will put an enormous burden on healthcare and tank productivity.

I don't think enforcing proper nutrition in children is bad, it should be the case.

[240 is Back]

I think the original idea is better, in this scenario food waste would be high and it's pretty unethical when you are aware that many people are starving. Promotion of a healthy diet should be enforced, it helps all areas including the economy. Having a generation of hyperactive, ill kids who progress to sick, shitty adults will put an enormous burden on healthcare and tank productivity.

I don't think enforcing proper nutrition in children is bad, it should be the case.

We don't allow children to make up their own math facts.  We don't let them read/write in their own made-up language.  And these are just skills.  We don't let them wear shorts when it's 15 degrees out. 

When it comes to nutrition, these are the building blocks of their BODY, not their mind.  We're talking about bone and muscle growth.  And their performance is completely dependent upon what they eat.   

See, the people rebelling, "Stay out of my kids' lunchbox", are pissed about govt involvement in the lives of people, which is fine.  But we're talking kids... little kids... when they get to high school, they can buy a cookie and a Hawaiin Punch for lunch, and many of them do... but when they're 7?  Come on.  the school district hires nutritionists to make sure the school lunches cover all the bases.  take it or leave it, but give the kid the option.  As a teacher, I often had lunch room duty and it sickened me, seeing the kid with the cookie and juice box staring at the chicken tenders, wishing he had actual sustenance, but hey, mom knows better, nobody is telling me how to raise my kid.... Shit, take the free lunch IN ADDITION and enjoy the buffet already

[Necrosis]

We don't allow children to make up their own math facts.  We don't let them read/write in their own made-up language.  And these are just skills.  We don't let them wear shorts when it's 15 degrees out. 

When it comes to nutrition, these are the building blocks of their BODY, not their mind.  We're talking about bone and muscle growth.  And their performance is completely dependent upon what they eat.   

See, the people rebelling, "Stay out of my kids' lunchbox", are pissed about govt involvement in the lives of people, which is fine.  But we're talking kids... little kids... when they get to high school, they can buy a cookie and a Hawaiin Punch for lunch, and many of them do... but when they're 7?  Come on.  the school district hires nutritionists to make sure the school lunches cover all the bases.  take it or leave it, but give the kid the option.  As a teacher, I often had lunch room duty and it sickened me, seeing the kid with the cookie and juice box staring at the chicken tenders, wishing he had actual sustenance, but hey, mom knows better, nobody is telling me how to raise my kid.... Shit, take the free lunch IN ADDITION and enjoy the buffet already

youth in asia is the only option. sp?

[Primemuscle]

Yea right, the left didn't have anything to do with it, just like they didn't have anything to do with banning pop and PB&J sandwiches.

And it didn't come from one misguided person, it came from a lunatic leftwing $heeplebitchwhore; a control freak who thinks we should all do the exact same thing, forbid the norm.. .

And yea, I know, republicans pretty much fit this same bill today, can't argue against that.

I worked for a school district until I retired. I have some experience with school lunch programs. PB&J sandwiches may have been discontinued because they were given to kids who weren't on a free lunch program and whose parents didn't pay the school for their lunches or pack them one. Rather then turn a kid away who didn't have the price of a lunch (repeatedly) they were given PB&J sandwiches and milk. Some parents complained that this stigmatized their kids (probably the same parents that weren't giving their kids money for lunch). When I retired, the staff donated their own money to help offset the school lunch cost for a kid whose parents didn't provide for them by either giving them money or packing them a lunch.

[Shockwave]

Promotion of a healthy diet should be enforced, it helps all areas including the economy

I don't think enforcing proper nutrition in children is bad, it should be the case.

why hello there, every tyrant in history.

enforce proper nutrition.... I.e., take away an individuals freedom to eat what they so choose (or a parents freedom to parent their chikd how they see fit)

I lose a little faith in humanity every day.

[Primemuscle]

why hello there, every tyrant in history.

enforce proper nutrition.... I.e., take away an individuals freedom to eat what they so choose (or a parents freedom to parent their chikd how they see fit)

I lose a little faith in humanity every day.

Parents are apparently doing a really great job feeding their kids, just about as great as they are feeding themselves these days. Yeah right. Look around you. The world keeps getting fatter. Enforce might be too strong a word, but strongly encourage is definitely in order. When it comes to kids, they will eat what they've been taught to eat. Teach them right and they will eat right. If we only eat what we chose and we have poor reference for that choice, we lose and it isn't pounds we lose it is our good health.

[Shockwave]

Parents are apparently doing a really great job feeding their kids, just about as great as they are feeding themselves these days. Yeah right. Look around you. The world keeps getting fatter. Enforce might be too strong a word, but strongly encourage is definitely in order. When it comes to kids, they will eat what they've been taught to eat. Teach them right and they will eat right. If we only eat what we chose and we have poor reference for that choice, we lose and it isn't pounds we lose it is our good health.

there is no justifiable way to tell someone they cant send their kids with thr lunch they want to feed their child. Encourage and education is one thing. But telling someone they cant choose what to feed thwir child is ridiculous and is the same kind of bullsbit that every tyrant in history has used to justify the oppression of freedom.

its no ones responsibility but the parents. If they fail, they fucking fail, its not up to the school or you or anyone else to decide what to feed themselves or their children.

fuck you and anyone else that thinks theyre somehow justified in telling others the right way to parent their children.

[tonymctones]

yup I knew the typical liberal shit baggery would float to the top in this discussion.

"the kids, the kids, wont someone think about the CHILDREN!!!!"

if kids have allergies there needs to be rules about sharing lunches not preventing kids from bringing lunches. If parents cant afford to feed their kids there are programs to help with that, it shouldnt prevent anyone else from sending their child to school with a lunch. If they parents of that "starving child" arent smart enough to stand up and apply for the readily available assistance programs well that child has a shit load more issues facing them than lunch...

you libtard morons will justify anything

[Dos Equis]

why hello there, every tyrant in history.

enforce proper nutrition.... I.e., take away an individuals freedom to eat what they so choose (or a parents freedom to parent their chikd how they see fit)

I lose a little faith in humanity every day.

Nah.  Don't lose faith in democracy.  He lives in a socialist country.  They have a different outlook on life.

[tonymctones]

its no ones responsibility but the parents. If they fail, they fucking fail, its not up to the school or you or anyone else to decide what to feed themselves or their children.

fuck you and anyone else that thinks theyre somehow justified in telling others the right way to parent their children.

yup a big FUCK YOU to the retards who support this

[Roger Bacon]

If you can send your kids to private school, or home school you really should.

[Necrosis]

why hello there, every tyrant in history.

enforce proper nutrition.... I.e., take away an individuals freedom to eat what they so choose (or a parents freedom to parent their chikd how they see fit)

I lose a little faith in humanity every day.

For an educational institution to enforce (teach) proper human (we are animal) nutrition is being a tyrant? Listen, people can do as they like but when we live in a collectivist society where poor eating habits effect the collective being (obesity, taxes). We teach people how to act appropriately in public ( indirectly inhibiting self expression) yet I doubt this is tyrant like. I think encourage but if the school is providing lunch it should be nothing but healthy, otherwise it;s a disservice.

I may have be misspoke or made a mistake because I was referring to the school.

[Necrosis]

yup a big FUCK YOU to the retards who support this

7

So you think feeding a human child poor nutrition when we know the consequences is not justifying telling the person about such a poor choice. Listen good parenting isn't up the interpreter there are basic things, like feed, cloth and care for the child