Which doesn't mean he WAS holding him down. It only means he might have been.
..and attempts to "hold down" are absolutely consistent with the presence of a gun.So let's quit acting as though this is as pat as it comes.
Guns will cause frantic, aggressive attempts at pinning; while frantic, aggressive attempts at pinning will cause flattened noses and banged heads.
Proof for this. Behavioral studies, perhaps? Crime reports.
What, specifically, could you attempt to deny?
You made the claim, you provide the proof.
Is that a no comment, Archer?
I was asking you to provide proof to back up your statement. Its not necessary to for me to comment on it because I didn't assert the opinion in the first place, you did.
...yet you won't attempt to deny it, because you can't do that without making yourself look foolish. Right?
wow youre a fucking idiot
lol..you guys are too much.
How can I deny something I never claimed to be true or untrue. I neither said the struggle was consistent with a gun or not. I have nothing to deny because I never asserted an opinion on it.
So you can't and won't deny it, Archer, but you'll decline further comment.Got it.
double facepalm.
There isn't anything for me to comment on. You made the comment, I didn't. You're the one who continues to decline to comment. You refuse to provide proof to back up your claim.
