Virginia Democrat Calls For Forcing Doctors To Accept Medicare, Medicaid

[Roger Bacon]

ROFL....

Virginia Democrat Calls For Forcing Doctors To Accept Medicare And Medicaid Patients

You would think that when your party is burying a hole that is getting harder and harder to get out of, you wouldn't want to that hole get deeper faster.  But here is Kathleen Murphy, Democrat running for the House of Delegates against Barbara Comstock, telling a forum in Great Falls that she believes it should law to force doctors to accept Medicare and Medicaid patients.  Forced by government decree, mind you.  A birdie sent me this:

Read more: http://masonconservative.typepad.com/the_mason_conservative/2013/11/virginia-democrat-calls-for-forcing-doctors-to-accept-medicare-and-medicaid-patients.html

[Roger Bacon]

The one and only goal of Dem/Progressive/Statists has always been Socialized Medicine-- Whether they call it 'single payer (sic)', 'Medicare for all', Medicaid for all', etc., makes no difference. It is why they are demonizing insurers, and soon, doctors. Lenin said it was the main pillar of the communist state-- that hasn't changed. We are seeing the reemergence of the elite/royal system of govt-- what is so puzzling is why so many are so willing to bow to it for a morsel of bread.

Posted by: Stevenlaststraw | November 03, 2013 at 08:57 AM

[Dago_Joe]

The one and only goal of Dem/Progressive/Statists has always been Socialized Medicine-- Whether they call it 'single payer (sic)', 'Medicare for all', Medicaid for all', etc., makes no difference. It is why they are demonizing insurers, and soon, doctors. Lenin said it was the main pillar of the communist state-- that hasn't changed. We are seeing the reemergence of the elite/royal system of govt-- what is so puzzling is why so many are so willing to bow to it for a morsel of bread.

Posted by: Stevenlaststraw | November 03, 2013 at 08:57 AM

Exactly right.  The Cloward-Piven Strategy in its ultimate form.  It would surely in one fell swoop overload the system and collapse it.  I am amazed more people have no idea about the CP Strategy.  ITs been around for ever and is BEING IMPLEMENTED IN ITS FULL FORM NOW!!!!  Restricting and finally eliminating the 2nd Ammend is the most important thing libfags need to get done.  IT is the only way to resist the takeover and when it is done we will truly be powerless.  It has been done over and over by totalitarian regimes and we are living through it now.  I am amazed at how brainwashed libs are.  Obama could literally do anything and they would defend him.  OBummercare was set up to fail.  Because when it does fail, he will say the only solution is a single payer system, which was the plan all along.  Problem-Reaction-Solution, classic dictatorial strategy.

[RRKore]

Exactly right.  The Cloward-Piven Strategy in its ultimate form.  It would surely in one fell swoop overload the system and collapse it.  I am amazed more people have no idea about the CP Strategy.  ITs been around for ever and is BEING IMPLEMENTED IN ITS FULL FORM NOW!!!!  Restricting and finally eliminating the 2nd Ammend is the most important thing libfags need to get done.  IT is the only way to resist the takeover and when it is done we will truly be powerless.  It has been done over and over by totalitarian regimes and we are living through it now.  I am amazed at how brainwashed libs are.  Obama could literally do anything and they would defend him.  OBummercare was set up to fail.  Because when it does fail, he will say the only solution is a single payer system, which was the plan all along.  Problem-Reaction-Solution, classic dictatorial strategy.

Hmmm. I read the wiki on The C/P strategy which was conceived in 1966 and don't think it'd work these days at all.  Does anyone current who's more sane than, say, Glen Beck believe it might work?

Per wikipedia:
he Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Seems to me that if the welfare system were overloaded, the benefits would just be cut and/or the requirements for qualification for assistance would be tightened.