Author Topic: Simeon Panda  (Read 29003 times)

rooseveltdunn

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #50 on: November 04, 2013, 08:35:29 PM »
Still prefer Ulysses though, more symmetrical and better lines.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #51 on: November 04, 2013, 08:46:16 PM »
Reminds me of a black Stan McQuay.
how? Stan looks awesome, but I don't see the comparison.

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11025
  • Getbig!
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #52 on: November 04, 2013, 08:55:36 PM »
how? Stan looks awesome, but I don't see the comparison.
Broad shoulders with tats on them, small waist, starting winning BB contest in so called natural shows like muscle mania. Has good looks, just to name a few.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #53 on: November 04, 2013, 09:30:36 PM »
Broad shoulders with tats on them, small waist, starting winning BB contest in so called natural shows like muscle mania. Has good looks, just to name a few.
His shoulder to waist ratio is more inline with Brian Buchanan...ain't like Stan's. Also if you look at the vid, he's got very long arms and legs, built like a basketball player---Small Fwd.
Physically he's very different than Stan. Other than Musclemania and the tats, looks, I don't see anything else.

flinstones1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7038
  • levroneflinstonee
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #54 on: November 04, 2013, 09:36:02 PM »
blk genetics

a white guy would have to take drugs all day eat and then maybe be able to take a photo like this one second after doing a full body workout hahahaa



lol  lets not get carried away this guy is not ronnie coleman. Besides...There are white guys with better physiques..... a young dennis newman would put the whopping on him.
l

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11025
  • Getbig!
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #55 on: November 04, 2013, 09:37:15 PM »
His shoulder to waist ratio is more inline with Brian Buchanan...ain't like Stan's. Also if you look at the vid, he's got very long arms and legs, built like a basketball player---Small Fwd.
Physically he's very different than Stan. Other than Musclemania and the tats, looks, I don't see anything else.
When Stan was in muscle mania his waist was alot smaller than in the IFBB. Stan looks tall in the 212 class even though he is short himself. I think Stan could do very well in mens physique if he wanted.  Panda has a good waist, but he is no Brain Buchanan.

flinstones1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7038
  • levroneflinstonee
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #56 on: November 04, 2013, 09:38:10 PM »
guys got oil in his arms 2. He is another level of development than stan mcay though. stan is  tiny guy and it doesnt take much to fill out at that height
l

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5594
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #57 on: November 04, 2013, 09:41:18 PM »
There are white guys with better physiques.....

If we're talking aesthetics, this has never been equalled -

forillagorilla

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1478
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #58 on: November 04, 2013, 09:45:39 PM »
Its is amazing how some guys can tell pretty much exactly what drugs a man used by simply looking at a picture ... 

ESFitness

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10176
  • i win.
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #59 on: November 04, 2013, 10:55:40 PM »
If we're talking aesthetics, this has never been equalled -

equaled? nah, we blew right past that shit... decades ago.

The Revelation

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 293
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #60 on: November 04, 2013, 10:56:41 PM »
Its is amazing how some guys can tell pretty much exactly what drugs a man used by simply looking at a picture ...  

it's not amazing when you've taken probably every anabolic under the sun, know what each one does, the look it brings, and have paid attention to those details at every body fat level.

it's called experience. you have to remember a lot of guys posting here aren't just poking themselves ignorantly and randomly w no clue what they are doing, some have decades of experience.  

I'm one of those guys and there are a few others here I've noticed who know what's going on- guys w a lot of knowledge and first hand experience.

I can pretty much tell what someone is using. anabolics are like a fingerprint. each one is different. they bring different looks when used correctly. what's difficult to tell is dosages. impossible imo.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #61 on: November 04, 2013, 11:02:24 PM »
When Stan was in muscle mania his waist was alot smaller than in the IFBB. Stan looks tall in the 212 class even though he is short himself. I think Stan could do very well in mens physique if he wanted.  Panda has a good waist, but he is no Brain Buchanan.
No, he's no Brian Buchanan, I said more inline---his relaxed taper in pics is great, but he doesn't have the lats to give that "flare"...

Also as far as his arms---his arms look like regular basketball player's arms, whoever said that he has oil his arms, how can you tell?

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5594
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #62 on: November 04, 2013, 11:21:43 PM »
equaled? nah, we blew right past that shit... decades ago.

Feel free to post up a more aesthetically pleasing physique. 

ESFitness

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10176
  • i win.
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #63 on: November 04, 2013, 11:22:22 PM »
Feel free to post up a more aesthetically pleasing physique. 

i don't keep pics of bbers on my pc. lol

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5594
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #64 on: November 04, 2013, 11:29:47 PM »
i don't keep pics of bbers on my pc. lol

Toss out a name, then. 

cephissus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7596
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #65 on: November 04, 2013, 11:30:30 PM »
equaled? nah, we blew right past that shit... decades ago.

"we" lmao

have fun in fantasy land, convict

Sophus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1114
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #66 on: November 04, 2013, 11:52:34 PM »
Simeon looks great in gym shots

He looks like shit on stage

ESFitness

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10176
  • i win.
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #67 on: November 05, 2013, 12:30:39 AM »
Toss out a name, then. 

Lee Haney wasn't aesthetically pleasing?

Flex Wheeler wasn't aesthetically pleasing?

just to name a couple...

or by "aesthetically pleasing" did you mean skinny? or "eh, i'm good enough.. i'll quit where I am".

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #68 on: November 05, 2013, 01:13:55 AM »
If we're talking aesthetics, this has never been equalled -
Every physique can be picked sort. There is no "perfect" physique...
And Paris had a long waist look to him.

falco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18595
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #69 on: November 05, 2013, 02:05:32 AM »
Maybe he has a tumor in his testicles wich make them secrete supranatural amounts of testosterone.

Kwon_2

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33809
  • Pretty sure he isn't in Ibiza getting the girls
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #70 on: November 05, 2013, 02:17:29 AM »
equaled? nah, we blew right past that shit... decades ago.

We haven't , yet.

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18769
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #71 on: November 05, 2013, 02:24:38 AM »
Reminds me of a black Stan McQuay.



Looked his best here and musclemania days before he turned pro

After that waist grew and conditioning went to shit, starting getting that glaze look

Most likely hit the GH and insulin hard after turning pro

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18769
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #72 on: November 05, 2013, 02:27:25 AM »
He's tall... compare him to Wade/Lebron... also amazing genetics, height, lines... and they don't bodybuild. 

One could argue he adds 5 years of heavy lifting, great nutrition... it's possible.  He's lanky, although highly muscular.  he's NOT thick like a pro.  He'd get defeated by balanced and THICKER NPC athletes.  230 at 6 foot 3?  that's thin.  back and thighs are years away.  I call natty.



Natty?? Hahaha u got to be joking...

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18769
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #73 on: November 05, 2013, 02:36:41 AM »
Lee Haney wasn't aesthetically pleasing?

Flex Wheeler wasn't aesthetically pleasing?

just to name a couple...

or by "aesthetically pleasing" did you mean skinny? or "eh, i'm good enough.. i'll quit where I am".

Correct

Add Chris Cormier to that list






Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5594
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Simeon Panda
« Reply #74 on: November 05, 2013, 02:44:53 AM »
Lee Haney wasn't aesthetically pleasing?

Flex Wheeler wasn't aesthetically pleasing?

just to name a couple...

or by "aesthetically pleasing" did you mean skinny? or "eh, i'm good enough.. i'll quit where I am".

Every physique can be picked sort. There is no "perfect" physique...
And Paris had a long waist look to him.

Haney and Wheeler are not even in the same galaxy aesthetically.

Both are more developed, by far, but standing relaxed neither come close to the ideal structure, lines and proportion of Paris.

Paris was as close to 'perfect' as any pro has ever been.