shit, I dunno, is that the best of your arguments? The same old timers think any physique past teh early 90's is complete shit 
no no no..i'm speaking old times in MY relative terms..even the old old timers agree that the mid 90s genetics and physiques were the best...except no one actually asks them....people read posts made by a scanty few stewart mc robertish people (ya noobs wont know who stewart mc robert is btw
) and assume every old timer thinks likewise..NOT so...
All you've done so far is make judgements about people based on their experience in the gym
ummmm...i'm holding back here...but politely put..isn't that what judgements are made on..opr should be??
if not..please define A SET OF CONGRUENT CRITERIA THAT JUDGEMENTS SHOULD BE BASED ON BRO...?? (oops..the caps r an accident)
So you weigh what, like 175 lbs? (not demeaning you) Then cant I make the same argument that you should be no one to criticise Ronnie's volume?
no right now i actually weight 170..but at my max i have weighed 220...cut
and i've gone from 160 to 220 in 6 months...it ws really really easy too...the juice gave me limitless appetite..i ate like i pig and never gained any fat..i trained like a wuss and i still gained...and i'm being honest...i have seen myself train harder when off the juice than on...but see..you wouldn;t even know how to identify there would ya??
and if i cant criticise rons volume..who the heck r you to critize dorians density?? and you haven't even juiced..soo in the scheme of experience i'm wayyyy ahead of you to make a judgement....
in the court of law they dont appoint noobs as judges ..do they??
