You didn`t read it,did you.
Mr Rooke was charged with the crime of withholding his TV licence fees, and in February 2013 the BBC took Mr Rooke to court. However, once the judge saw the evidence presented by Mr Rooke and his team of experts against the BBC, he had no option but to discharge the conviction. That decision in effect meant that the judge felt that Mr Rooke had reasonable cause to withhold his TV licence fees from the BBC on the basis of the evidence shown about 9/11 and the BBC’s role in covering up that evidence. A quite monumental legal outcome.