Author Topic: Ronnie Rockel  (Read 6740 times)

jem123

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 303
  • Getbig!
Ronnie Rockel
« on: January 04, 2006, 11:16:50 AM »
What is your take on Ronnie Rockel.

This guy has always impressed me. His symmetry and shape are excellent. With another 10- 15 pounds of muscle he could really do some damage.


BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8574
  • "In Falcon We Trust"
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2006, 11:19:11 AM »
do you dream about him?
$

jem123

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 303
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2006, 11:21:47 AM »
do you dream about him?

only when i'm not dreaming about you arsewipe. :-*

Sumpa

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
  • GetHUGE!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2006, 11:22:04 AM »
he got screwed at the olympia! he owned cormier at least.  ;)
anyways, i think he has great potential and hope that he gains some weight without doing something stupid.
Team Nasser!

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19455
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2006, 11:22:43 AM »
In the old days he would have made an impact, but in the age of mass monsters he doesn't register.  :(

Sumpa

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
  • GetHUGE!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2006, 11:26:19 AM »
yep. sad.  :(
Team Nasser!

Danny

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4630
  • The original Superman
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2006, 11:29:23 AM »
he got screwed at the olympia! he owned cormier at least.  ;)
anyways, i think he has great potential and hope that he gains some weight without doing something stupid.

Ditto, much better than Cormier that day.
"What we do in life ECHOES in eternity "

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19455
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2006, 11:30:57 AM »
Like I said, a small fry (relatively speaking, of course).  Great shape and conditioning though.  :)

Gord

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1788
  • Smile when you say that
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2006, 11:35:09 AM »
In the old days he would have made an impact, but in the age of mass monsters he doesn't register.  :(

Sadly, you're right.

This physique somehow wasn't considered good enough to even make top 15 at the last Olympia, thanks to ludicurous judging.








Lies, damn lies and diets

Gord

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1788
  • Smile when you say that
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2006, 11:36:56 AM »
Some more shots.





Lies, damn lies and diets

jem123

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 303
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2006, 11:40:13 AM »
Good shots.

He looks fantastic, especially in the front lat spread.

Definitely screwed at the olympia.

HRDCOR

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1411
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2006, 01:59:56 PM »
Ronnie is awesome----- i have said that all along , he gets screwed because they don't compear him , but when they do he cleans up !!! this happened at the Olympia big time(mind you they didn't compear any one at the Olympia !!!)The only thing that lets Ronnie down is his posing---- man if i could work with him for a bit he would pose fantastic and start getting the rewards he deserves---- If Dave Henry can win a show(i am also a fan of Dave's) then Ronnie should be well up there--- IFBB judges take note , start compearing Ronnie and see what happens , you will be surprised !!!

wgtnmuscle1

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #12 on: January 04, 2006, 02:07:07 PM »
yes ronnie is awesome
met him at 2005 ausie gp where he should have got second
and then watch him and jaroslav horvath train at dohertys gym the next day
and spoke with them both as they were beening filmed for their new training video
really nice guys both of them
even tho they arent massive they have shape and size in thier own way
and not very tall and just look like normal guys in there street clothes
hopefully they will do better

Gord

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1788
  • Smile when you say that
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #13 on: January 04, 2006, 02:57:29 PM »
I keep hearing about competitors like Ronnie Rockel not being massive enough and needing more size. Honestly, look at those pics; why would he need more size?

What is it with this incomprehensible obsession about needing to get ever more massive?
Lies, damn lies and diets

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #14 on: January 04, 2006, 03:00:54 PM »
what exactly was it he was missing in the judges eyes? Size? In regards to who exactly? Great physique, reminds me of a few years ago when Claude Groulx finished somewhere like 21st but should have been fighting for 10th - 12th easily. Its beyond me what the judges are thinking
Scouser on Tour

healthiswealth

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #15 on: January 04, 2006, 03:33:38 PM »
omfg this is pretty much perfect symmetry



he would be top 6 at the O in my books...

Borracho

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8215
  • Waking up is possible if ur tired of the dream....
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #16 on: January 04, 2006, 03:43:51 PM »
We all agree that he looks great yet guys like him place really low at bbing shows. Something really needs to be done about this.
1

fathead

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2011
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #17 on: January 04, 2006, 03:55:21 PM »
I'm really nit picking but why the hell did he use dream tan. That alone probably cost him a couple spots. He was definetly better than ruhl, farah, and even cormier. I would of johnny jackson 10, dave henry 11, rockel 12, then mustafa 13th, 14 cormier.. 15 ruhl..

I thought the judging was off all together Ronnie won ok fine   but Badell should of been 2nd  Jay 3rd    I would of also put Branch in the top 5 or 6   

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #18 on: January 04, 2006, 04:05:45 PM »
Something's fcuked up when someone with the kind of physique that Jay Cutler has beats Ronnie Rockel.

When I look at old pics of Cutler, those pics from around 96-97 when he turned pro, it really starts to become fcuked up. His physique was better in many ways: detailed back, taper, waist.

I don't see it as Cutler's fault. He shows up with the physique that is best liked by these muscle worshippers judges. And has the money to show for it.

If the physique of Rockel would get awarded, then the IFBB would most likely have less PR problems as far as the general public goes, I think a lot more companies in the health industry would see potential with using bodybuilders in their marketing strategy then.

YIP
Zack
As empty as paradise

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #19 on: January 04, 2006, 04:10:36 PM »
I said it months ago...

ROckel getting screwed at this year's O was the best thing that could happen to him.

He is now the underdog that many fans are rooting for.

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #20 on: January 04, 2006, 04:16:30 PM »
I said it months ago...

ROckel getting screwed at this year's O was the best thing that could happen to him.

He is now the underdog that many fans are rooting for.

Not until he gets rid of that Bob Dole grin of his:



YIP
Zack
As empty as paradise

Borracho

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8215
  • Waking up is possible if ur tired of the dream....
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #21 on: January 04, 2006, 04:17:38 PM »
I said it months ago...

ROckel getting screwed at this year's O was the best thing that could happen to him.

He is now the underdog that many fans are rooting for.

I'm fed up with the whole thing. Something needs to be done now. Guys like Melvin, Johnnie Jackson, Ronny Rockel, David Henry, etc. should be winning shows. Enough is enough. How much farther are we gonna let this go on ?

1

GMCtrk

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #22 on: January 04, 2006, 04:18:38 PM »
Something's fcuked up when someone with the kind of physique that Jay Cutler has beats Ronnie Rockel.

When I look at old pics of Cutler, those pics from around 96-97 when he turned pro, it really starts to become fcuked up. His physique was better in many ways: detailed back, taper, waist.

I don't see it as Cutler's fault. He shows up with the physique that is best liked by these muscle worshippers judges. And has the money to show for it.

If the physique of Rockel would get awarded, then the IFBB would most likely have less PR problems as far as the general public goes, I think a lot more companies in the health industry would see potential with using bodybuilders in their marketing strategy then.

YIP
Zack

Bodybuilding had 20 years of "aesthetics" and honestly what's the point of it, like coleman says, this is bodybuilding, if you want to look at pretty boys go watch survivor or something.

jem123

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 303
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #23 on: January 04, 2006, 04:24:29 PM »
Bodybuilding had 20 years of "aesthetics" and honestly what's the point of it, like coleman says, this is bodybuilding, if you want to look at pretty boys go watch survivor or something.

spoken like a true arsehole!

Rockel represents what bodybuilding is about size, shape and symmetry.

If you look at his photos on this thread and don't think he looks good, i'm afraid your in the wrong sport.

Sumpa

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
  • GetHUGE!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #24 on: January 05, 2006, 05:08:22 AM »
Does anyone know when he will compete the next time? Man, looking at those olympia pictures again:  :o
I have to say it again: he got screwed big time!
Team Nasser!