Author Topic: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?  (Read 2991 times)

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2013, 09:03:24 AM »
Beyond insanity and completely delusional.  This reminds me a lot of the communist paranoia of the fifties.  Instead of seeing communism everywhere, they see racism. 
A

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2013, 09:16:18 AM »
The play the race card because they have literally nothing else

They have no legitimate arguement for ANY of their radical positions, only emotion.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66458
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2013, 09:19:09 AM »
What a clown.   ::)

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2013, 09:21:55 AM »
There will be at least one person on here who will defend this ridiculousness.
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2013, 09:23:23 AM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2013, 09:42:46 AM »

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2013, 09:47:59 AM »
Look at the crap that these nitwits come up with.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/12/08/melissa_harris_perry_likens_derogatory_term_obamacare_to_the_n-word.html

it's definitely used as a pejorative (just like Romneycare) but it's most definitely not racist

Obama doesn't seem to mind it so this chick should find something else to bellyache about

If she needs some ideas she should spend some time on this board and look at how truly world class crybabies spend their day crying about irrelevant shit 24/7

bears

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2195
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2013, 10:13:41 AM »
I mean do any of you guys notice how she pontificates like a preacher speaking from a pulpit?  I've said it before but I have to say it again.  Our political parties are becoming religious groups.  She speaks like she's talking about her savior.  Her passion is unbridled. 

AND SHE'S A FUCKING GOD DAMN NEWS ANCHOR!!!!!! 

I'm not saying that the liberal democrats hold a monopoly on treating politicians like religious figures but does anyone agree that its getting out of hand?  it's like in this day and age everyone is ditching religion but the innate desire to believe in something bigger than yourself ultimately prevails and people are looking to politics to fill this void.


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2013, 10:44:25 AM »
I mean do any of you guys notice how she pontificates like a preacher speaking from a pulpit?  I've said it before but I have to say it again.  Our political parties are becoming religious groups.  She speaks like she's talking about her savior.  Her passion is unbridled. 

AND SHE'S A FUCKING GOD DAMN NEWS ANCHOR!!!!!! 

I'm not saying that the liberal democrats hold a monopoly on treating politicians like religious figures but does anyone agree that its getting out of hand?  it's like in this day and age everyone is ditching religion but the innate desire to believe in something bigger than yourself ultimately prevails and people are looking to politics to fill this void.



she's not a news anchor

sheesh

settle the fuck down

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2013, 10:45:34 AM »
She speaks like she's talking about her savior. 

She credited him with "saving" the auto industry.

HEHEHEHEEH!!



Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2013, 10:46:55 AM »
She credited him with "saving" the auto industry.

HEHEHEHEEH!!




are you referring to the industry that came to the government begging for a bailout?


dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2013, 10:56:54 AM »
are you referring to the industry that came to the government begging for a bailout?



Did Ford beg for a bailout?


dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2013, 10:58:48 AM »
Never mind that in a free market the industry would not have disappeared.

There is always another company, another startup, ready to take the place of those that fail.

That is how the economy is supposed to work and would work if left alone.

I can't believe libtards are still claiming that the bailout was necessary.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2013, 11:00:52 AM »
Obama refused to give up on Detroit!


LMFAO!!!

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2013, 11:02:09 AM »
Obama refused to give up on Detroit!


LMFAO!!!

LOL!!!

He "saved" Detroit!!! Oh, wait...

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2013, 11:05:52 AM »
LOL!!!

He "saved" Detroit!!! Oh, wait...

There are many minority millionaires who have the capital to invest in Detroit but they rarely do.  I wonder why?
A

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2013, 11:30:03 AM »
I mean do any of you guys notice how she pontificates like a preacher speaking from a pulpit?  I've said it before but I have to say it again.  Our political parties are becoming religious groups.  She speaks like she's talking about her savior.  Her passion is unbridled. 

AND SHE'S A FUCKING GOD DAMN NEWS ANCHOR!!!!!! 

I'm not saying that the liberal democrats hold a monopoly on treating politicians like religious figures but does anyone agree that its getting out of hand?  it's like in this day and age everyone is ditching religion but the innate desire to believe in something bigger than yourself ultimately prevails and people are looking to politics to fill this void.



She needs to be fired. The news is supposed to present objective, unbiased information, but most of it is now just a collection of liberal leaning obama worshippers. Its getting closer and closer to a russian style state-controlled propaganda outlet.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2013, 11:53:09 AM »
Did Ford beg for a bailout?

no, they were the only one that didn't to the best of my recollection

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #19 on: December 09, 2013, 11:56:02 AM »
no, they were the only one that didn't to the best of my recollection

Honda, Toyota, Ford, BMW, etc didn't need a bailout either. 


Obama is a disgusting leech and a failed thugPOTUS

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #20 on: December 09, 2013, 12:03:18 PM »
Honda, Toyota, Ford, BMW, etc didn't need a bailout either. 

This is the point that I would like to make.

Industry is a general term.

How can an industry be in need of having to be "saved" if there were companies within that industry that were still financially strong, viable and in no need of a bailout?


2Thick

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1703
  • His Thickness
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #21 on: December 09, 2013, 12:26:48 PM »
This is the point that I would like to make.

Industry is a general term.

How can an industry be in need of having to be "saved" if there were companies within that industry that were still financially strong, viable and in no need of a bailout?



Liberal propaganda.

I spent many years working in several of the world's largest financial institutions in the past, and $ was forced even on those institutions here in the US that were strong and healthy and didn't need it.
A

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #22 on: December 09, 2013, 12:32:22 PM »
DETROIT, MI- The U.S. government's $85 billion bailout of General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC was more successful than many first anticipated, according to a new study released today.

The Center for Automotive Research study -- called ''The Effect on the U.S. Economy of the Successful Restructuring of General Motors'' --€“ found that the controversial 2008-2009 bailout, saved 2.6 million jobs in 2009 alone and $284.4 billion in personal income was preserved over 2009-2010.

CAR concluded that if the U.S. government had refused to assist GM and Chrysler in their financial crisis of "unprecedented proportions," then the whole U.S. economy would be ''operating without a safety net, with the exception of course, of the banking system.''

The study, which was independently funded by the Ann Arbor-based nonprofit center, comes as the U.S. Treasury is expected to fully exit the Detroit-based automaker by year's end. Once the government completely exits GM the government estimated it will lose about $10 billion, which remains far less than some first predicted.

GM, or "Government Motors" as some critics have called it, has continually been ridiculed due to the government ownership, which was the result of the auto industry bailout that began under President George W. Bush in 2008 and which was expanded by President Barack Obama in 2009.

The bailout of GM alone, according to the study, saved 1.2 million jobs in 2009 and preserved $39.4 billion in personal and social insurance tax collections in 2009 and 2010.

GM North America President Mark Reuss said he believes once the government completely exits the automaker, it will provide a boost for customer consideration and morale inside GM.


"This has been a long, hard road with no repeat customers and the label of 'Government Motors,' and I’m pretty excited for (that to end)," Reuss said in response to a question about the government's exodus during a media event Monday at GM's Customer Experience Center in Warren, Mich. "I think a lot of people who work for the company feel that way."

Once the government exits GM, Reuss said he believes some customers that have not looked at GM's vehicles because of the government's ownership -- particularly pickup truck buyers -- will start considering them "right away."

The Detroit News today reports that the government could sell its remaining shares of GM -- less than 32 million shares -- by the end of this week. A year ago, the government announced it would completely exit by by early-2014. It upped that estimate to the end of 2013 earlier this month.

The Treasury originally owned about 61 percent of GM as part of the auto bailout, which forced GM and crosstown rival Chrysler through a government-backed bankruptcy.

The Obama administration completely exited Chrysler last year after recovering $11.2 billion of its $12.5 billion bailout to the Auburn Hills-based automaker.

The new CAR findings are a follow-up to a November 2008 study from the former University of Michigan research organization

bears

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2195
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #23 on: December 09, 2013, 12:41:15 PM »
she's not a news anchor

sheesh

settle the fuck down

right right.  they're now all editorialists.  give me a fucking break.  if you were to ask her what she does for a living she would tell you that she's a journalist and she delivers news.  but she acts like she's preaching from the pulpit. 

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Now the term "obamacare" is "derogatory"?
« Reply #24 on: December 09, 2013, 12:58:09 PM »
Honda, Toyota, Ford, BMW, etc didn't need a bailout either. 


Obama is a disgusting leech and a failed thugPOTUS

Apparently Ford, BMW and Toyota got government money and Honda asked for money from the Japanese government

http://jalopnik.com/5704575/ford-bmw-toyota-took-secret-government-money

http://www.newser.com/story/52383/honda-hops-on-bailout-bandwagon.html