Author Topic: Room 140 (wow)  (Read 702 times)

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31068
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Room 140 (wow)
« on: December 16, 2013, 12:31:55 PM »
I wonder if anyone who was innocent has sued them for false imprisonment after being taken there and detained for hours.

---------------------------------


NEW YORK (AP) -- Outside the view of paying customers, people accused of shoplifting at Macy's huge flagship store are escorted by security guards to cells in "Room 140," where they can be held for hours, asked to sign an admission of guilt and pay hundreds in fines, sometimes without any conclusive proof they stole anything.

As shoppers jam stores ahead of the December holidays, claims of racial profiling at department stores in New York have helped expose the wide latitude that laws in at least 27 states give retailers to hold and fine shoplifting suspects, even if a person hasn't yet technically stolen anything, is wrongly accused or criminal charges are dropped.

"You must remember, these people are not police officers; they are store employees," said Faruk Usar, the attorney for a 62-year-old Turkish woman who sued Macy's, which some customers say bullied them into paying fines on the spot or harassed them with letters demanding payment. "When they are detained, they are not yet even in a real jail."

Industrywide, more than $12 billion is lost to shoplifting each year. The laws, which vary on strictness and fine amounts, allow stores to try to recoup some losses. Under New York's longstanding law, retailers may collect a penalty of five times the cost of the stolen merchandise, up to $500 per item, plus as much as $1,500 if the merchandise isn't in a condition to be sold. A conviction is not necessary to bring a civil claim.

Some customers say stores have harassed them into signing admissions of guilt in order to turn a profit — not just recoup a loss.

Retailers don't divulge how much money they recoup but use it in part to offset security costs, said Barbara Staib, spokeswoman for the National Association for Shoplifting Prevention. The total is a fraction of what they lose, she said.

"We tend to forget that retailers are the victims of crime when it comes to shoplifting," she said.

But at least nine customers at the Macy's store immortalized in "Miracle on 34th Street" say in lawsuits that the retailer is abusing the law, wrongly targeting minorities and holding customers for hours, years after it settled similar claims brought by the state attorney general by paying a $600,000 fine and changing practices. That agreement expired in 2008.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is investigating the new claims against retailers. Last week, New York state stores agreed to post a customer "bill of rights" on their websites explicitly prohibiting profiling and unreasonable searches.

Usar's client, Ayla Gursoy, was detained in 2010 after she carried two coats in her arms up several flights of stairs in the flagship store, according to her suit. Store security accused Gursoy, who speaks little English, of trying to steal. She was asked to sign a form admitting guilt and pay a fine. She refused, the police were called and she was arrested.

Gursoy and others say they were held for hours in Room 140, a bare room with two small, barred holding cells with wooden benches within the store.

Elina Kazan, a spokeswoman for Cincinnati-based Macy's, said the company's practices prohibit coercion when recovering fines.

"Our policy of exercising our right to pursue a civil recovery payment is consistent with common practice in the retail industry and within the parameters of the law," she said.

Many retailers detain suspected shoplifters, industry experts said, but few have dedicated jail cells and most don't ask for payments on the spot like Macy's.

Most of the accused receive letters in the mail demanding payment from a law firm like the one used by Macy's, Palmer, Reifler & Associates, of Orlando, Fla. That firm also represents Home Depot, Wal-Mart and many other stores and sends out about 115,000 letters per month.

"We are confident in our clients' training processes and procedures for evaluating and investigating theft matters," attorney Natt Reifler said.

Letters sent to Gursoy said that if she didn't pay, she would be sued. One said she owed $400; the next said she owed $675 — the increase unexplained.

"We believe the whole purpose of her detention was to get the signature, to get the payments," Usar said shortly before his client's suit was settled in court Dec. 4. The terms were not disclosed. Her criminal charge was dismissed after no witness could testify.

In San Leandro, Calif., Jimin Chen accused Home Depot in a federal lawsuit of abusing the laws by shaking down customers to make an extra profit.

He said he was stopped in September by a security guard there who falsely accused him of trying to steal work gloves worth $3.99 that he had taken off the shelves and worn to load lumber into his cart. He said he was detained until he signed an admission of guilt.

Later, he started receiving letters demanding money; $350, then $675. Home Depot disputes the claims and has asked for dismissal.

Lawyers say that retailers rarely actually sue for the money, and they often suggest letter recipients don't bother paying because refusing won't affect their credit.

Generally, industry experts say, the laws allowing retailers to hold and fine suspected shoplifters are applied correctly.

"Retailers do a really good job of identifying where actual theft cases have occurred, and intervening and conducting investigations," said Joseph LaRocca, who runs RetaiLPartners, an industry group aimed at building partnerships between retailers and law enforcement. "There are always exceptions, but by and large, there are few mistakes here."

The racial profiling allegations started in New York this fall with a different retailer, Barneys New York, after two black customers said they were stopped while buying expensive merchandise. The retailer has said it does not profile, and neither customer was asked to sign a confession or pay a fine.

But the allegations grew to include Macy's. Among those complaining was Rob Brown of the HBO show "Treme," who said he was stopped after buying a $1,300 Movado watch for his mother this summer.

Brown, 29, said he too was taken to Room 140. There, he said in a federal suit filed by attorney Doug Wigdor, others being held were all "individuals of color." He was released, he said, when people realized he was a celebrity.

Kazan, of Macy's, said she couldn't comment on pending litigation.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2013, 12:35:45 PM »
Crazy.  Those laws need to be repealed. 

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31068
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2013, 02:03:56 PM »
Are they really "laws"?

Detained by someone other than LE shouldn't be allowed.  It doesn't take LE hours to show up.  They should be called and if you are being arrested take you into their custody. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2013, 02:06:29 PM »
According to the article you posted:  "laws in at least 27 states give retailers to hold and fine shoplifting suspects, even if a person hasn't yet technically stolen anything, is wrongly accused or criminal charges are dropped."

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2013, 02:11:31 PM »
No way a mall employee is gonna 'detain me', fuck that, they aren't law enforcement and have zero authority over you

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2013, 03:25:42 PM »
No way a mall employee is gonna 'detain me', fuck that, they aren't law enforcement and have zero authority over you

Yeah.  They better have about four or five guys if they plan on detaining me.   :)

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2013, 05:41:58 PM »
No way a mall employee is gonna 'detain me', fuck that, they aren't law enforcement and have zero authority over you
yup, Ill listen to what you have to say but the moment im done and get up to leave you either better have the police there to arrest me or get the fuck out of the way.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31068
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2013, 06:06:33 PM »
No way a mall employee is gonna 'detain me', fuck that, they aren't law enforcement and have zero authority over you

Then what?  If you act out, they could charge you with assault next.  Normally their "loss prevention" doors lock automatically when they shut so you just can't leave, if you kick it down that is vandalism/property destruction. 

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31068
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2013, 06:07:58 PM »
According to the article you posted:  "laws in at least 27 states give retailers to hold and fine shoplifting suspects, even if a person hasn't yet technically stolen anything, is wrongly accused or criminal charges are dropped."

That would violate the due process clause(s) and the 4th, 5th (maybe) and 14th Amendment.

Not saying they can't do it, but surely in the case of the person being innocent they have a recourse of action.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2013, 07:11:46 PM »
Yeah...but as you mentioned you can't kick the door off its hinges. I'd just plead rascism...since I'm white it would be the gay card I guess...or the straight white male conservative card, but I'd have more fun with the gay card. I guess angry half irish half italian card..or PTSD. Thats the one, PTSD...screaming about gooks in the wire, low crawl around the store. I'd get off.
L

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2013, 07:21:14 PM »
screaming about gooks in the wire, low crawl around the store. I'd get off.
hahahah

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2013, 07:42:49 PM »
Thats my retirement plan.....go from company to company, scream PTSD, flip a desk and get paid.
L

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2013, 07:46:48 PM »
According to the article you posted:  "laws in at least 27 states give retailers to hold and fine shoplifting suspects, even if a person hasn't yet technically stolen anything, is wrongly accused or criminal charges are dropped."


I would question the accuracy of that.  Here in MD, and many other states, we have every right to resist an unlawful arrest.  So, if you haven't done anything and they are trying to detain you, I have a hard time believing the law allows for it.

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2013, 06:29:23 AM »
Then what?  If you act out, they could charge you with assault next.  Normally their "loss prevention" doors lock automatically when they shut so you just can't leave, if you kick it down that is vandalism/property destruction. 

Maybe take a shit right on the floor and start doing jumping jacks while pissing all in my pants and see who wants to come wrap me up ;D

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #14 on: December 17, 2013, 07:13:59 AM »
That's the way I'd go....
L

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2013, 07:17:28 AM »
This is ridiculous and should not be allowed to happen.
A

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31068
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2013, 07:28:27 AM »
Obviously I can imagine that the room is cemented enough that you can't use your cell phone to call the police and report this yourself.   Any outrageous or volatile behavior would just be used against you later.  Basically, you are stuck.  But I would sue the pants off them when I was released if I were innocent and put through this.  I would hit every news station and news paper that I could.  I would get the media on my side and they would cough up big time instead of little hush money.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63756
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Room 140 (wow)
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2013, 09:00:46 AM »

I would question the accuracy of that.  Here in MD, and many other states, we have every right to resist an unlawful arrest.  So, if you haven't done anything and they are trying to detain you, I have a hard time believing the law allows for it.

Certainly doesn't sound legal.